The developmental trajectory of children's auditory and visual statistical learning abilities: modality-based differences in the effect of age.

Infants, children and adults are capable of extracting recurring patterns from their environment through statistical learning (SL), an implicit learning mechanism that is considered to have an important role in language acquisition. Research over the past 20 years has shown that SL is present from very early infancy and found in a variety of tasks and across modalities (e.g., auditory, visual), raising questions on the domain generality of SL. However, while SL is well established for infants and adults, only little is known about its developmental trajectory during childhood, leaving two important questions unanswered: (1) Is SL an early-maturing capacity that is fully developed in infancy, or does it improve with age like other cognitive capacities (e.g., memory)? and (2) Will SL have similar developmental trajectories across modalities? Only few studies have looked at SL across development, with conflicting results: some find age-related improvements while others do not. Importantly, no study to date has examined auditory SL across childhood, nor compared it to visual SL to see if there are modality-based differences in the developmental trajectory of SL abilities. We addressed these issues by conducting a large-scale study of children's performance on matching auditory and visual SL tasks across a wide age range (5-12y). Results show modality-based differences in the development of SL abilities: while children's learning in the visual domain improved with age, learning in the auditory domain did not change in the tested age range. We examine these findings in light of previous studies and discuss their implications for modality-based differences in SL and for the role of auditory SL in language acquisition. A video abstract of this article can be viewed at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3kg35hoF0pw.

[1]  Karl Magnus Petersson,et al.  Artificial Language Learning in Adults and Children , 2010 .

[2]  Richard N Aslin,et al.  Statistical learning of adjacent and nonadjacent dependencies among nonlinguistic sounds , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[3]  Jessica Maye,et al.  Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination , 2002, Cognition.

[4]  Synnöve Carlson,et al.  Audiospatial and visuospatial working memory in 6-13 year old school children. , 2003, Learning & memory.

[5]  Rocío Alcalá Quintana,et al.  Interval bias in 2AFC detection tasks: sorting out the artifacts , 2011 .

[6]  Erik D. Thiessen,et al.  When cues collide: use of stress and statistical cues to word boundaries by 7- to 9-month-old infants. , 2003, Developmental psychology.

[7]  Janne von Koss Torkildsen,et al.  Advancing Our Understanding of the Link between Statistical Learning and Language Acquisition: The Need for Longitudinal Data , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[8]  Joanne Arciuli,et al.  Statistical Learning Is Related to Reading Ability in Children and Adults , 2012, Cogn. Sci..

[9]  D. Houston,et al.  Test–Retest Reliability in Infant Speech Perception Tasks , 2016 .

[10]  R. Gómez,et al.  Artificial grammar learning by 1-year-olds leads to specific and abstract knowledge , 1999, Cognition.

[11]  J. Saffran Statistical Language Learning , 2003 .

[12]  J. Saffran,et al.  Dog is a dog is a dog: Infant rule learning is not specific to language , 2007, Cognition.

[13]  Amy S. Finn,et al.  The curse of knowledge: First language knowledge impairs adult learners’ use of novel statistics for word segmentation , 2008, Cognition.

[14]  B. Scholl,et al.  The Automaticity of Visual Statistical Learning Statistical Learning , 2005 .

[15]  J. Saffran Constraints on Statistical Language Learning , 2002 .

[16]  Vinciane Gaillard,et al.  Visual statistical learning in children and young adults: how implicit? , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[17]  Elisabeth A. Karuza,et al.  On-line Measures of Prediction in a Self-Paced Statistical Learning Task , 2014, CogSci.

[18]  P. Perruchet,et al.  Implicit learning and statistical learning: one phenomenon, two approaches , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[19]  E. Newport,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article INCIDENTAL LANGUAGE LEARNING: Ustening (and Learning) out of the Comer of Your Ear , 2022 .

[20]  J. Fiser,et al.  The best time to acquire new skills: age-related differences in implicit sequence learning across the human lifespan. , 2012, Developmental science.

[21]  M. Van der Linden,et al.  Implicit sequence learning in children. , 1998, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[22]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Modality-constrained statistical learning of tactile, visual, and auditory sequences. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[23]  D. Barr,et al.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[24]  Scott P. Johnson,et al.  Visual statistical learning in infancy: evidence for a domain general learning mechanism , 2002, Cognition.

[25]  Avi Karni,et al.  No Childhood Advantage in the Acquisition of Skill in Using an Artificial Language Rule , 2010, PloS one.

[26]  J. Colombo The development of visual attention in infancy. , 2001, Annual review of psychology.

[27]  Evan Kidd,et al.  Implicit statistical learning is directly associated with the acquisition of syntax. , 2012, Developmental psychology.

[28]  Erik D. Thiessen,et al.  Statistical learning and the critical period: how a continuous learning mechanism can give rise to discontinuous learning. , 2016, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[29]  Erik D. Thiessen,et al.  Beyond Word Segmentation , 2013 .

[30]  Christopher M. Conway,et al.  Implicit statistical learning in language processing: Word predictability is the key , 2010, Cognition.

[31]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Timing is everything: Changes in presentation rate have opposite effects on auditory and visual implicit statistical learning , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[32]  D. Shanks IMPLICIT LEARNING AND TACIT KNOWLEDGE - AN ESSAY ON THE COGNITIVE UNCONSCIOUS - REBER,A , 1995 .

[33]  Judit Gervain,et al.  How Infant Speech Perception Contributes to Language Acquisition , 2008, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[34]  Joanne Arciuli,et al.  Statistical learning in typically developing children: the role of age and speed of stimulus presentation. , 2011, Developmental science.

[35]  B. Ambridge,et al.  The structure of working memory from 4 to 15 years of age. , 2004, Developmental psychology.

[36]  Nicholas B. Turk-Browne,et al.  Hippocampal Structure Predicts Statistical Learning and Associative Inference Abilities during Development , 2017, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[37]  Derek M. Houston,et al.  Visual Sequence Learning in Infancy: Domain-General and Domain-Specific Associations with Language. , 2012, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[38]  Dima Amso,et al.  Across space and time: infants learn from backward and forward visual statistics. , 2017, Developmental science.

[39]  Paavo Alku,et al.  Statistical language learning in neonates revealed by event-related brain potentials , 2009, BMC Neuroscience.

[40]  M. Goldsmith,et al.  Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1996 .

[41]  P. Kuhl Early language acquisition: cracking the speech code , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[42]  M. García-Pérez,et al.  THE DIFFERENCE MODEL WITH GUESSING EXPLAINS INTERVAL BIAS IN TWO‐ALTERNATIVE FORCED‐CHOICE DETECTION PROCEDURES , 2010 .

[43]  Erik D. Thiessen,et al.  Perceptual Development and Statistical Learning , 2015 .

[44]  Jenny R. Saffran,et al.  Domain‐General Learning Capacities , 2008 .

[45]  J. Bruner,et al.  The capacity for joint visual attention in the infant , 1975, Nature.

[46]  L. Maloney,et al.  Bias and sensitivity in two-interval forced choice procedures: Tests of the difference model , 2008, Vision Research.

[47]  Z. Dienes Artificial grammar learning , 2007 .

[48]  R. Frost,et al.  Statistical learning as an individual ability: Theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence. , 2015, Journal of memory and language.

[49]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  Rapid Serial Auditory Presentation: A New Measure of Statistical Learning in Speech Segmentation. , 2015, Experimental psychology.

[50]  Alexa R. Romberg,et al.  Statistical learning and language acquisition. , 2010, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[51]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Domain generality versus modality specificity: the paradox of statistical learning , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[52]  Scott P. Johnson,et al.  Statistical Learning Across Development: Flexible Yet Constrained , 2013, Front. Psychology.

[53]  J. H. Howard,et al.  Developmental differences in implicit learning of spatial context. , 2007, Neuropsychology.

[54]  J. Mehler,et al.  Bootstrapping word order in prelexical infants: A Japanese–Italian cross-linguistic study , 2008, Cognitive Psychology.

[55]  J. Saffran The Use of Predictive Dependencies in Language Learning , 2001 .

[56]  Daniel O. Jackson,et al.  Second Language Acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis , 2000 .

[57]  Ágnes Lukács,et al.  Development of Different Forms of Skill Learning Throughout the Lifespan , 2015, Cogn. Sci..

[58]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Statistical Learning and Language: An Individual Differences Study , 2012 .

[59]  Scott P. Johnson,et al.  Visual statistical learning in the newborn infant , 2011, Cognition.