Achieving Participant Acceptance of their Avatars

An experiment was carried out to examine the extent to which an avatar can be perceived by people as similar to themselves, including their face and body. The avatar was judged by the participants themselves rather than by third parties. The experiment was organized in two phases. The initial phase consisted of a forced-choice, paired comparison method used to create a ranking of 10 virtual faces in order of preference. This set of faces included a facial mesh, created by a custom software pipeline to rapidly generate avatars that resembled the experimental participants. Six more faces, derived from the participants' own face, were also shown in order to gain insight into the acceptance of a variety of facial similarities. In the second phase, full-body avatars with the most and least preferred faces were presented along with the direct pipeline output. Participants rated their level of satisfaction with those avatars as virtual self-representations and provided the level of perceived resemblance to themselves. The results show that our avatars are perceived to be similar to the self, rated at 7.5/10. Those avatars with faces derived from the participants' face mixed with an ethnically similar face were also rated with high scores. These results differ significantly from how arbitrary avatars are perceived. Therefore, reasonably physically similar avatars can also be expected to be perceived as similar by participants.

[1]  Joan Llobera,et al.  Virtual reality for assessment of patients suffering chronic pain: a case study , 2012, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  S. Shyam Sundar,et al.  Visualizing ideal self vs. actual self through avatars: Impact on preventive health outcomes , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[3]  Fuqian Shi,et al.  Survey: Parameterized 3D human body modeling and geometric deformation technology , 2009, 2009 IEEE 10th International Conference on Computer-Aided Industrial Design & Conceptual Design.

[4]  M. Slater,et al.  The building blocks of the full body ownership illusion , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[5]  Tien Dat Nguyen,et al.  How does presentation method and measurement protocol affect distance estimation in real and virtual environments? , 2010, TAP.

[6]  Nicholas Epley,et al.  Mirror, Mirror on the Wall: Enhancement in Self-Recognition , 2008, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[7]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  Virtual Doppelgangers: Psychological Effects of Avatars Who Ignore Their Owners , 2010, Online Worlds: Convergence of the Real and the Virtual.

[8]  C. Liu,et al.  The use of 3D information in face recognition , 2006, Vision Research.

[9]  Marco Gillies,et al.  Comparing and Evaluating Real Time Character Engines for Virtual Environments , 2010, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[10]  T. Metzinger,et al.  Full-body illusions and minimal phenomenal selfhood , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[11]  Kori Inkpen Quinn,et al.  Me and my avatar: exploring users' comfort with avatars for workplace communication , 2011, CSCW '11.

[12]  Marco Perugini,et al.  Self-body recognition depends on implicit and explicit self-esteem. , 2012, Body image.

[13]  Ying Zhu,et al.  Self-face recognition in attended and unattended conditions: an event-related brain potential study , 2006, Neuroreport.

[14]  M. Martínez-González,et al.  Relationship between body image disturbance and incidence of depression: the SUN prospective cohort , 2009, BMC public health.

[15]  G. Rhodes The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. , 2006, Annual review of psychology.

[16]  M. Slater,et al.  Multisensory Stimulation Can Induce an Illusion of Larger Belly Size in Immersive Virtual Reality , 2011, PloS one.

[17]  Lucina Q. Uddin,et al.  Brain connectivity and the self: The case of cerebral disconnection , 2011, Consciousness and Cognition.

[18]  B. Laeng,et al.  Three-dimensional information in face recognition: an eye-tracking study. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[19]  Ming-Hui Wen,et al.  Body and mind: a study of avatar personalization in three virtual worlds , 2009, CHI.

[20]  André Gagalowicz,et al.  Towards the Automatic Generation of 3D Photo-Realistic Avatars Using 3D Scanned Data , 2011, MIRAGE.

[21]  Thomas C. Brown,et al.  An Enquiry into the Method of Paired Comparison: Reliability, Scaling, and Thurstone's Law of Comparative Judgment , 2012 .

[22]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  Using Virtual Heads for Person Identification : An Empirical Study Comparing Photographs to Photogrammetrically-Generated Models , 2003 .

[23]  M. Tamburrino,et al.  Body Image: A Handbook of Theory, Research, and Clinical Practice , 2003 .

[24]  T. Brown,et al.  Economic Valuation by the Method of Paired Comparison, with Emphasis on Evaluation of the Transitivity Axiom , 1998 .

[25]  Antonio Susín,et al.  Transferring the Rig and Animations from a Character to Different Face Models , 2008, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[26]  Verónica Orvalho,et al.  A Facial Rigging Survey , 2012, Eurographics.

[27]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  Effects of facial similarity on user responses to embodied agents , 2010, TCHI.

[28]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  First Person Experience of Body Transfer in Virtual Reality , 2010, PloS one.

[29]  Rosa Mikeal Martey,et al.  Performing the Looking-Glass Self: Avatar Appearance and Group Identity in Second Life , 2011 .

[30]  J. Bailenson,et al.  Virtual Self-Modeling: The Effects of Vicarious Reinforcement and Identification on Exercise Behaviors , 2009 .

[31]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  Examining Virtual Busts: Are Photogrammetrically Generated Head Models Effective for Person Identification? , 2004, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[32]  C. Cooley Human nature and the social order , 1902 .

[33]  J. H. Tufts Human Nature and the Social Order. , 1903 .

[34]  John J. Foxe,et al.  My face or yours? Event-related potential correlates of self-face processing , 2010, Brain and Cognition.

[35]  Tabitha C. Peck,et al.  Putting yourself in the skin of a black avatar reduces implicit racial bias , 2013, Consciousness and Cognition.

[36]  M. Slater,et al.  Illusory ownership of a virtual child body causes overestimation of object sizes and implicit attitude changes , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Massimo Bergamasco,et al.  A Flexible Framework for WideSpectrum VR Development , 2010, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.