Association between mobile phone traffic volume and road crash fatalities: A population-based case-crossover study.

Use of mobile phones while driving is known to cause crashes with possible fatalities. Different habits of mobile phone use might be distracting forces and display differential impacts on accident risk; the assessment of the relative importance is relevant to implement prevention, mitigation, and control measures. This study aimed to assess the relationship between the use of mobile phones at population level and road crash fatalities in large urban areas. Data on road crashes with fatalities were collected from seven Italian metropolitan areas and matched in time and space with high resolution mobile phone traffic volume data about calls, texts, Internet connections and upload/download data. A case-crossover study design was applied to estimate the relative risks of road accident for increases in each type of mobile phone traffic volumes in underlying population present in the small areas where accidents occurred. Effect modification was evaluated by weekday/weekend, hour of the day, meteorological conditions, and street densities. Positive associations between road crashes rates and the number of calls, texts, and Internet connections were found, with incremental risks of 17.2% (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 7.7, 27.6), 8.4% (CI 0.7, 16.8), and 54.6% (CI 34.0, 78.5) per increases (at 15 min intervals) of 5 calls/100 people, 3 text/100 people, and 40 connections/100 people, respectively. Small differences across cities were detected. Working days, nighttime and morning hours were associated with greater phone use and more road accidents. The relationship between mobile phone use and road fatalities at population level is strong. Strict controls on cellular phone in the vehicle may results in a large health benefit.

[1]  A. Bolignano,et al.  A dynamic urban air pollution population exposure assessment study using model and population density data derived by mobile phone traffic , 2016 .

[2]  Dot Hs.  The Impact of Driver Inattention On Near-Crash/Crash Risk: , 2006 .

[3]  Teena M. Garrison,et al.  Impact of Relevance and Distraction on Driving Performance and Visual Attention in a Simulated Driving Environment , 2013 .

[4]  M. Maclure.  The case-crossover design: a method for studying transient effects on the risk of acute events. , 1991, American journal of epidemiology.

[5]  Mark Asbridge,et al.  The use of meta-analysis or research synthesis to combine driving simulation or naturalistic study results on driver distraction. , 2014, Journal of safety research.

[6]  M. Woodward,et al.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of strategies for the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  S. Wood.  Thin plate regression splines , 2003 .

[8]  E. Fernández,et al.  Safety belt and mobile phone usage in vehicles in Barcelona (Spain). , 2014, Gaceta sanitaria.

[9]  George Yannis,et al.  Attitudes of Greek Drivers with Focus on Mobile Phone Use While Driving , 2015, Traffic injury prevention.

[10]  David Bishai,et al.  Road Traffic Injury in China: A Review of National Data Sources , 2012, Traffic injury prevention.

[11]  N. Laird,et al.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials. , 1986, Controlled clinical trials.

[12]  Jeremy D Sudweeks,et al.  An Analysis of Driver Inattention Using a Case-Crossover Approach On 100-Car Data: Final Report , 2010 .

[13]  Richard J. Hanowski,et al.  An Assessment of Commercial Motor Vehicle Driver Distraction Using Naturalistic Driving Data , 2012, Traffic injury prevention.

[14]  T. Bateson,et al.  Control for seasonal variation and time trend in case-crossover studies of acute effects of environmental exposures. , 1999, Epidemiology.

[15]  Gerald McGwin,et al.  The Prevalence of Distraction Among Passenger Vehicle Drivers: A Roadside Observational Approach , 2015, Traffic injury prevention.

[16]  Jeff K Caird,et al.  Safety-critical event risk associated with cell phone tasks as measured in naturalistic driving studies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2016, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[17]  T. Dingus,et al.  Distracted driving and risk of road crashes among novice and experienced drivers. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  The Impact of Driver Inattention on Near-Crash/Crash Risk: An Analysis Using the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study Data , 2006 .

[19]  William Navidi,et al.  Risk Set Sampling for Case-Crossover Designs , 2002, Epidemiology.

[20]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Association between cellular-telephone calls and motor vehicle collisions. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  Simon Washington,et al.  Understanding the impacts of mobile phone distraction on driving performance: A systematic review , 2016 .

[22]  Dot Hs,et al.  The Impact of Hand-Held And Hands-Free Cell Phone Use on Driving Performance and Safety-Critical Event Risk , 2013 .

[23]  Annibale Biggeri,et al.  Vulnerability to Heat-Related Mortality: A Multicity, Population-Based, Case-Crossover Analysis , 2006, Epidemiology.

[24]  A. Biggeri,et al.  Susceptibility factors to ozone-related mortality: a population-based case-crossover analysis. , 2010, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[25]  Ola Svenson,et al.  Mobile phones and driving: a review of contemporary research , 2005, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[26]  Rebecca L Olson,et al.  The Impact of Hand-Held and Hands-Free Cell Phone Use on Driving Performance and Safety-Critical Event Risk , 2013 .

[27]  Anne T McCartt,et al.  Cell Phones and Driving: Review of Research , 2006, Traffic injury prevention.

[28]  Erich Muehlegger,et al.  Cell phones and motor vehicle fatalities , 2014 .

[29]  Chiara Lorini,et al.  [Beta-hexachlorocyclohexane contamination in dairy farms of the Sacco River Valley, Latium, Italy, 2005. A retrospective cohort study]. , 2012 .