Information Technology and Administrative Reform: Will E-Government Be Different?

This article examines the theoretical ideal of information technology as an instrument of administrative reform and examines the extent to which that ideal has been achieved in the United States. It takes a look at the findings from research about the use and impacts of information technology from the time of the mainframe computer through the PC revolution to the current era of the Internet and e-government. It then concludes that information technology has never been an instrument of administrative reform; rather, it has been used to reinforce existing administrative and political arrangements. It assesses why this is the case and draws conclusions about what should be expected with future applications of information technologies — in the time after e-government. It concludes with a discussion of the early evidence about newer applications for automated service delivery, 24/7 e-government, and e-democracy.

[1]  Ari-Veikko Anttiroiko,et al.  Encyclopedia of Digital Government , 2006 .

[2]  Donald F. Norris,et al.  Electronic Democracy at the American Grassroots , 2005, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[3]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  The Impacts of IT on Firm and Industry Structure: The Personal Computer Industry , 2005 .

[4]  Bonnie A. Nardi,et al.  Why we blog , 2004, CACM.

[5]  William H. Dutton,et al.  Transforming Enterprise : The Economic and Social Implications of Information Technology , 2004 .

[6]  Bonnie A. Nardi,et al.  Blogging as social activity, or, would you let 900 million people read your diary? , 2004, CSCW.

[7]  D. West E‐Government and the Transformation of Service Delivery and Citizen Attitudes , 2004 .

[8]  G. Garson,et al.  Digital Government: Principles and Best Practices , 2003 .

[9]  D. Norris,et al.  Electronic Government at the Local Level , 2003 .

[10]  Brian Kahin,et al.  First International Conference on the Economic and Social Implications of Information Technology , 2003 .

[11]  M. Gascó New Technologies and Institutional Change in Public Administration , 2003 .

[12]  Å. Grönlund Emerging Electronic Infrastructures , 2003 .

[13]  D. Jorgenson,et al.  Projecting Productivity Growth: Lessons from the U.S. Growth Resurgence , 2002 .

[14]  Charles Kaylor,et al.  Gauging e-government: A report on implementing services among American cities , 2001, Gov. Inf. Q..

[15]  William Creager,et al.  Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) , 2001 .

[16]  Jungwoo Lee,et al.  Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model , 2001, Gov. Inf. Q..

[17]  Geunjoo Lee,et al.  Are Computers Boosting Productivity?: A Test of the Paradox in State Governments , 1999 .

[18]  Stephen H. Holden,et al.  The evolution of information technology management at the federal level: implications for public administration , 1999 .

[19]  C. Urquhart,et al.  The impact of information. , 1997, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[20]  A. Pinsonneault,et al.  Middle management downsizing: an empirical investigation of the impact of information technology , 1997 .

[21]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Information Technology and Middle Management Downsizing: A Tale of Two Cities , 1997 .

[22]  F. Lichtenberg,et al.  Computer Use and Productivity Growth in Federal Government Agencies, 1987 to 1992 , 1996 .

[23]  George R. S. Weir,et al.  People and Computers IX: Crafting Interaction: Styles, Metaphors, Modalities and Agents , 1994 .

[24]  Joey F. George,et al.  Examining the computing and centralization debate , 1991, CACM.

[25]  Stuart Bretschneider,et al.  Management Information Systems in Public and Private Organizations: An Empirical Test. , 1990 .

[26]  S. Caudle Managing Information Resources in State Government , 1990 .

[27]  Donald A. Marchand,et al.  Managing Information Resources: New Directions in State Government. , 1989 .

[28]  K. Kraemer,et al.  Datawars: The Politics of Modeling in Federal Policymaking , 1987 .

[29]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Wired Cities: Shaping the Future of Communications , 1987 .

[30]  Jason L. Dedrick,et al.  Computing and Public Organizations , 1986 .

[31]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  The Dynamics of Computing , 1985 .

[32]  Paul Attewell,et al.  Computing and organizations: what we know and what we don't know , 1984, CACM.

[33]  John Leslie King,et al.  Centralized versus decentralized computing: organizational considerations and management options , 1983, CSUR.

[34]  Rob Kling,et al.  The Political Character of Computerization in Service Organizations: Citizen Interests or Bureaucratic Control , 1983 .

[35]  Daniel Robey,et al.  Computer information systems and organization structure , 1981, CACM.

[36]  Maria Pomffyova,et al.  Management information systems , 1981, ACM '70.

[37]  Rob Kling,et al.  Social Analyses of Computing: Theoretical Perspectives in Recent Empirical Research , 1980, CSUR.

[38]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  The Federal Push to Bring Computer Applications to Local Governments , 1979 .

[39]  Rob Kling,et al.  Automated welfare client-tracking and service integration: the political economy of computing , 1978, CACM.

[40]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Management utilization of computers in American local governments , 1978, CACM.

[41]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Technology and Urban Management , 1977 .

[42]  William H. Dutton,et al.  Automotive Informatics: Information Technology and Enterprise Transformation in the Automobile Industry , 2004 .

[43]  G. Garson,et al.  The promise of digital government , 2004 .

[44]  M. J. Moon The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality? , 2002 .

[45]  Jacques Berleur,et al.  Human Choice and Computers , 2002, IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing.

[46]  J. Fountain Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change , 2001 .

[47]  Alain Pinsonneault,et al.  The impact of information technology on the middle management workforce : an empirical investigation , 1990 .

[48]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  COMPUTERS AND THE CONSTITUTION - A HELPFUL, HARMFUL OR HARMLESS RELATIONSHIP , 1987 .

[49]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  The dynamics of change in computing use: A theoretical framework , 1986 .

[50]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Modeling as Negotiating: The Political Dynamics of Computer Models in the Policy Process , 1985 .

[51]  S. Klatzky,et al.  Automation, Size, and the Locus of Decision Making: The Cascade Effect , 1970 .