Grasping intentions: from thought experiments to empirical evidence

Skepticism has been expressed concerning the possibility to understand others' intentions by simply observing their movements: since a number of different intentions may have produced a particular action, motor information—it has been argued—might be sufficient to understand what an agent is doing, but not her remote goal in performing that action. Here we challenge this conclusion by showing that in the absence of contextual information, intentions can be inferred from body movement. Based on recent empirical findings, we shall contend that: (1) intentions translate into differential kinematic patterns; (2) observers are especially attuned to kinematic information and can use early differences in visual kinematics to anticipate the intention of an agent in performing a given action; (3) during interacting activities, predictions about the future course of others' actions tune online action planning; (4) motor activation during action observation subtends a complementary understanding of what the other is doing. These findings demonstrate that intention understanding is deeply rooted in social interaction: by simply observing others' movements, we might know what they have in mind to do and how we should act in response.

[1]  G. Johansson.  Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[2]  J. Cutting,et al.  Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display , 1977 .

[3]  S. Runeson,et al.  Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person and action perception: Expe , 1983 .

[4]  J. Searle.  Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind , 1983 .

[5]  B. Abernethy,et al.  Expert-novice differences in an applied selective attention task. , 1987 .

[6]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Constraints on human arm movement trajectories. , 1987, Canadian journal of psychology.

[7]  J. Montepare,et al.  Impressions of people created by age-related qualities of their gaits. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  J. Montepare,et al.  Impressions of people created by age-related qualities of their gaits. , 1988 .

[9]  W. Dittrich.  Action Categories and the Perception of Biological Motion , 1993, Perception.

[10]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Motor prediction , 2001, Current Biology.

[11]  Andrea H. Mason,et al.  Grip forces when passing an object to a partner , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  A. Young,et al.  Emotion Perception from Dynamic and Static Body Expressions in Point-Light and Full-Light Displays , 2004, Perception.

[13]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  The motor theory of social cognition: a critique , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  Recognizing people from their movement. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  G. Knoblich,et al.  The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  Lucy Johnston,et al.  Person Recognition from Dynamic Events: The Kinematic Specification of Individual Identity in Walking Style , 2005 .

[17]  Sarah-Jayne Blakemore,et al.  The role of motor contagion in the prediction of action , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  Jim W Kay,et al.  Gender recognition from point-light walkers. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  M. Santello,et al.  Effects of end-goal on hand shaping. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  Peter Neri,et al.  Meaningful interactions can enhance visual discrimination of human agents , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  W. Prinz.  What Re-Enactment Earns Us , 2006, Cortex.

[22]  Ruud G. J. Meulenbroek,et al.  Joint-action coordination in transferring objects , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Beyond grasping: Representation of action in human anterior intraparietal sulcus , 2007, NeuroImage.

[24]  Caroline Catmur,et al.  Sensorimotor Learning Configures the Human Mirror System , 2007, Current Biology.

[25]  U. Castiello,et al.  Different action patterns for cooperative and competitive behaviour , 2007, Cognition.

[26]  H. Bekkering,et al.  The mirror neuron system is more active during complementary compared with imitative action , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  Luca Turella,et al.  An object for an action, the same object for other actions: effects on hand shaping , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Predictive coding: an account of the mirror neuron system , 2007, Cognitive Processing.

[29]  C. Frith.  Social cognition , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  S. Gallagher.  Direct perception in the intersubjective context , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[31]  U. Castiello,et al.  Both your intention and mine are reflected in the kinematics of my reach-to-grasp movement , 2008, Cognition.

[32]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Understanding action beyond imitation: reversed compatibility effects of action observation in imitation and joint action. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  U. Castiello,et al.  The case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde: A kinematic study on social intention , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[34]  N. Sebanz,et al.  Evolving intentions for social interaction: from entrainment to joint action , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  P. Jacob.  What Do Mirror Neurons Contribute to Human Social Cognition , 2008 .

[36]  Pierre Jacob,et al.  The tuning-fork model of human social cognition: A critique , 2009, Consciousness and Cognition.

[37]  U. Castiello,et al.  Does the intention to communicate affect action kinematics? , 2009, Consciousness and Cognition.

[38]  Michael J. Richardson,et al.  Social Connection Through Joint Action and Interpersonal Coordination , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[39]  U. Castiello,et al.  Modulation of the action control system by social intention: unexpected social requests override preplanned action. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  G. Vingerhoets,et al.  Multifocal intraparietal activation during discrimination of action intention in observed tool grasping , 2010, Neuroscience.

[41]  Giulio Sandini,et al.  Visual information gleaned by observing grasping movement in allocentric and egocentric perspectives , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[42]  Cristina Becchio,et al.  Inferring intentions from biological motion: A stimulus set of point-light communicative interactions , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[43]  U. Castiello,et al.  Toward You , 2010 .

[44]  C. Frith,et al.  Rapid Response Subject Collections , 2022 .

[45]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: interpretations and misinterpretations , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[46]  M. Gentilucci,et al.  To me or to you? When the self is advantaged , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[47]  Umberto Castiello,et al.  Corticospinal excitability is specifically modulated by the social dimension of observed actions , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[48]  U. Castiello,et al.  Cues to intention: The role of movement information , 2011, Cognition.

[49]  V. Manera,et al.  Cooperation or competition? Discriminating between social intentions by observing prehensile movements , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[50]  K. Verfaillie,et al.  The Second-Agent Effect: Communicative Gestures Increase the Likelihood of Perceiving a Second Agent , 2011, PloS one.

[51]  Cristina Becchio,et al.  Communicative Interactions Improve Visual Detection of Biological Motion , 2011, PloS one.

[52]  M. Gentilucci,et al.  Social Requests and Social Affordances: How They Affect the Kinematics of Motor Sequences during Interactions between Conspecifics , 2011, PloS one.

[53]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Online prediction of others’ actions: the contribution of the target object, action context and movement kinematics , 2012, Psychological research.

[54]  Leonhard Schilbach,et al.  Seeing minds: A neurophilosophical investigation of the role of perception-action coupling in social perception , 2012, Social neuroscience.

[55]  Umberto Castiello,et al.  Social grasping: From mirroring to mentalizing , 2012, NeuroImage.