Reduced-order aerodynamic models for aeroelastic control of turbomachines

A reduced order aerodynamic model is developed for aeroelastic analysis of turbomachines. The proper orthogonal decompostion technique is used to obtain the modal basis vectors of this model. Twodimensional frequency domain solutions are used to obtain the basis vectors efficiently, however the model itself is developed in the time domain and is cast in state-space form. The number of states of the model is less than ten per blade passage, making it appropriate for control applications. The aerodynamic model is coupled with a simple structural model that haa two degrees of freedom for each blade. Results are presented for unsteady inviscid flow through a single stage rotor that moves in both pitch and plunge. The technique is applicable to viscous and three-dimensional problems as well as multi-stage problems with inlet and exit disturbance flows. Introduction With the current trend towards increased operating speeds and more flexible blading, aeroelasticity has become a critical consideration in the design of compressors. Understanding and predicting aeroelastic phenomena are crucial to ensuring that a compressor will operate within stability boundaries, and thus has a large impact on the design process. Appropriate blade design, together with strategies for controlling the onset of instabilities, can significantly impact the stable operating range, potentially leading to better compressor performance. In addition, understanding high cycle fatigue is important to prolong engine lifetimes. ‘Research Assistant, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics tPrincipal Research Engineer, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics tAssociate Professor, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics SAssociate Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science. Associate Fellow AIAA Copyright @I999 by Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. with permission. Various possible flow control methods for extending the stable operating range of compressors are currently under investigation. For active control, a variety of actuation mechanisms could be employed, including air injection and piezo-electrics. Implementation of these actuators with the appropriate control law would be used to ensure that blade vibrations remain damped. It is also possible to extend the stability boundaries of the compressor by altering the aerodynamic or structural properties of the blades. Mistuning is an example of this approach : rotor symmetry is broken by making the blades different from one another, either structurally or aerodynamically, and thus introducing a distribution of blade frequencies in the cascade.’ Experimental and numerical results show that intentional mistuning of rotor blades can delay the onset of instabilities.2 Mistuning is a form of passive control for flutter or high cycle fatigue. Aeroelastic phenomena involve a complicated interaction between the aerodynamics and the structural dynamics of the blades. Typically, very simple aerodynamic models have been used for aeroelastic analyses. The flow is usually assumed to be two-dimensional, inviscid and incompressible.3 These methods are useful near design conditions but do not predict the flow well off-design where blade loading effects are important.4 They are also not applicable to transonic flows where shock dynamics play a significant role in determining the aerodynamic response. The non-linear problem can be solved using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methods to perform simulations of the unsteady Euler or Navier-Stokes equations, however such techniques are computationally very expensive and have a large number of degrees of freedom, which means that they are not suitable for control design purposes. More efficient methods for time-varying flow can be obtained by considering the unsteady solution to be a small perturbation about a steady-state 3ow.s A set of linearised equations is then obtained which can be time-marched to obtain a flow solution at each instant. This approach is still computationally very expensive and is not really practicable for

[1]  Kenneth C. Hall,et al.  EIGENANALYSIS OF UNSTEADY FLOW ABOUT AIRFOILS, CASCADES, AND WINGS , 1994 .

[2]  Earl H. Dowell,et al.  Reduced order models in unsteady aerodynamics , 1999 .

[3]  J. Dugundji,et al.  Flutter and forced response of mistuned rotors using standing wave analysis , 1983 .

[4]  D. C. Wisler,et al.  Unsteady Aerodynamics and Gust Response in Compressors and Turbines , 1992 .

[5]  Martin Goland,et al.  Principles of aeroelasticity , 1975 .

[6]  Edward F. Crawley,et al.  Calculation of unsteady flows in turbomachinery using the linearized Euler equations , 1989 .

[7]  J. Peraire,et al.  AIAA 99 – 1467 LOW ORDER AERODYNAMIC MODELS FOR AEROELASTIC CONTROL OF TURBOMACHINES , 1999 .

[8]  Benjamin Shapiro Passive control of flutter and forced response in bladed disks via mistuning , 1999 .

[9]  Bernd R. Noack,et al.  A global stability analysis of the steady and periodic cylinder wake , 1994, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[10]  K. Hall Eigenanalysis of unsteady flows about airfoils, cascades, and wings , 1994 .

[11]  Eric James Grimme,et al.  Krylov Projection Methods for Model Reduction , 1997 .

[12]  K. Hall,et al.  Optimization and mechanisms of mistuning in cascades , 1985 .

[13]  D. P. Young,et al.  GMRES acceleration of computational fluid dynamics codes , 1985 .

[14]  Christophe Pierre,et al.  A reduced-order modeling technique for mistuned bladed disks , 1994 .

[15]  Edward F. Crawley,et al.  A linearized Euler analysis of unsteady flows in turbomachinery , 1987 .

[16]  L. Sirovich Turbulence and the dynamics of coherent structures. I. Coherent structures , 1987 .

[17]  Earl H. Dowell,et al.  Eigenvalue calculation procedure for an Euler/Navier-Stokes solver with application to flows over airfoils , 1991 .

[18]  J. H. Wagner,et al.  Supercritical Airfoil Technology Program Wake Experiments and Modeling for Fore- and Aft-Loaded Compressor Cascades. , 1980 .

[19]  Michael C. Romanowski Reduced order unsteady aerodynamic and aeroelastic models using Karhunen-Loeve eigenmodes , 1996 .

[20]  Youcef Saad,et al.  A Basic Tool Kit for Sparse Matrix Computations , 1990 .

[21]  Christophe Pierre,et al.  Localization Phenomena in Mistuned Assemblies with Cyclic Symmetry Part I: Free Vibrations , 1988 .

[22]  Christophe Pierre,et al.  Forced response of mistuned bladed disks using reduced-order modeling , 1996 .

[23]  F. Moore,et al.  A Theory of Post-Stall Transients in Axial Compression Systems: Part I—Development of Equations , 1986 .

[24]  J. J. Adamczyk,et al.  Unsteady flow in a supersonic cascade with subsonic leading-edge locus , 1978 .

[25]  Jack L. Kerrebrock,et al.  Aircraft Engines and Gas Turbines , 1977 .

[26]  D. S. Whitehead Vibration of Cascade Blades Treated by Actuator Disc Methods , 1959 .

[27]  Benjamin Shapiro,et al.  Symmetry Approach to Extension of Flutter Boundaries via Mistuning , 1998 .

[28]  T. Fransson,et al.  Aeroelasticity in Turbomachines : Comparison of Theoretical and Experimental Cascade Results + Appendix A5 : All Experimental and Theoretical Results for the 9 Standard Configurations. , 1986 .

[29]  R. C. F. Dye,et al.  Vibration Amplitudes of Compressor Blades Resulting From Scatter in Blade Natural Frequencies , 1969 .

[30]  Chao Yang,et al.  ARPACK users' guide - solution of large-scale eigenvalue problems with implicitly restarted Arnoldi methods , 1998, Software, environments, tools.

[31]  J. Peraire,et al.  OPTIMAL CONTROL OF VORTEX SHEDDING USING LOW-ORDER MODELS. PART II-MODEL-BASED CONTROL , 1999 .

[32]  P. Holmes,et al.  The Proper Orthogonal Decomposition in the Analysis of Turbulent Flows , 1993 .

[33]  Christophe Pierre,et al.  Dynamic response of an industrial turbomachinery rotor , 1996 .

[34]  Robert Haimes,et al.  Validation of a Numerical Method for Unsteady Flow Calculations , 1991 .

[35]  Michael B. Giles,et al.  Stator/rotor interaction in a transonic turbine , 1988 .

[36]  O. Bendiksen Flutter of Mistuned Turbomachinery Rotors , 1984 .

[37]  Joseph M. Verdon,et al.  Review of unsteady aerodynamic methods for turbomachinery aeroelastic and aeroacoustic applications , 1993 .

[38]  Kenneth C. Hall,et al.  The Influence of Neighboring Blade Rows on the Unsteady Aerodynamic Response of Cascades , 1995 .

[39]  Kenneth C. Hall,et al.  A Reduced Order Model of Unsteady Flows in Turbomachinery , 1995 .

[40]  Man Mohan Rai,et al.  Navier-Stokes Simulations of Rotor/Stator Interaction Using Patched and Overlaid Grids , 1987 .

[41]  C. Pierre,et al.  On the effects of interblade coupling on the statistics of maximum forced response amplitudes in mistuned bladed disks , 1995 .

[42]  Mattan Kamon,et al.  A coordinate-transformed Arnoldi algorithm for generating guaranteed stable reduced-order models of RLC circuits , 1996, Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Aided Design.

[43]  T. Theodorsen General Theory of Aerodynamic Instability and the Mechanism of Flutter , 1934 .

[44]  Earl H. Dowell,et al.  Reduced-order modelling of unsteady small-disturbance flows using a frequency-domain proper orthogonal decomposition technique , 1999 .

[45]  Robert E. Kielb,et al.  Flutter and Response of a Mistuned Cascade in Incompressible Flow , 1982 .

[46]  D. J. Ewins,et al.  The effects of detuning upon the forced vibrations of bladed disks , 1969 .

[47]  Karen Willcox,et al.  Aeroelastic computations in the time domain using unstructured meshes , 1997 .

[48]  Paul G. A. Cizmas,et al.  Reduced-Order Modeling of Unsteady Viscous Flow in a Compressor Cascade , 1998 .

[49]  Daniel H. Buffum,et al.  Blade Row Interaction Effects on Flutter and Forced Response , 1995 .

[50]  Taehyoun Kim,et al.  Frequency-Domain Karhunen -Loeve Method and Its Application to Linear Dynamic Systems , 1998 .