Student academic performance stochastic simulator based on the Monte Carlo method

Abstract In this paper, a computer-based tool is developed to analyze student performance along a given curriculum. The proposed software makes use of historical data to compute passing/failing probabilities and simulates future student academic performance based on stochastic programming methods (Monte Carlo) according to the specific university regulations. This allows to compute the academic performance rates for the specific subjects of the curriculum for each semester, as well as the overall rates (the set of subjects in the semester), which are the efficiency rate and the success rate. Additionally, we compute the rates for the Bachelors degree, which are the graduation rate measured as the percentage of students who finish as scheduled or taking an extra year and the efficiency rate (measured as the percentage of credits of the curriculum with respect to the credits really taken). In Spain, these metrics have been defined by the National Quality Evaluation and Accreditation Agency (ANECA). Moreover, the sensitivity of the performance metrics to some of the parameters of the simulator is analyzed using statistical tools (Design of Experiments). The simulator has been adapted to the curriculum characteristics of the Bachelor in Engineering Technologies at the Technical University of Madrid (UPM).

[1]  Bernard Fortin,et al.  Do Peers Affect Student Achievement? Evidence from Canada Using Group Size Variation , 2010 .

[2]  Herminio Rodríguez Príncipe.  FACTORS INFLUENCING STUDENTS' ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN THE FIRST ACCOUNTING COURSE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE UNIVERSITIES IN PUERTO RICO , 2005 .

[3]  R. Kuehl.  Design of Experiments: Statistical Principles of Research Design and Analysis , 1999 .

[4]  M. Shafiq,et al.  FACTORS AFFECTING STUDENTS' QUALITY OF ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE: A CASE OF SECONDARY SCHOOL LEVEL , 2011 .

[5]  Jack P. C. Kleijnen,et al.  An Overview of the Design and Analysis of Simulation Experiments for Sensitivity Analysis , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  J.-M.B. Maris,et al.  Factors contributing to difference in performance between small and large sections , 1995 .

[7]  S. R. Ting,et al.  Predicting academic success of first-year engineering students from standardized test scores and psychosocial variables , 2001 .

[8]  Shaobo Huang,et al.  Predicting student academic performance in an engineering dynamics course: A comparison of four types of predictive mathematical models , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[9]  Reuven Y. Rubinstein,et al.  Simulation and the Monte Carlo Method , 1981 .

[10]  H. Scheffé,et al.  The Analysis of Variance , 1960 .

[11]  N. M. Zuviria,et al.  SAPM: ANFIS based prediction of student academic performance metric , 2012, 2012 Third International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT'12).

[12]  Saeid Motavalli,et al.  Academic Resource Planning via Simulation and Inductive Classification , 2008 .

[13]  N. Metropolis,et al.  Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines , 1953, Resonance.

[14]  F. A. Dorca,et al.  Consistent Evolution of Student Models by Automatic Detection of Learning Styles , 2012, IEEE Latin America Transactions.

[15]  Camino Fernández,et al.  Two Examples of Deterministic versus Stochastic Modeling of Chemical Reactions , 2003 .

[16]  Luciano Vieira Lima,et al.  A Stochastic Approach for Automatic and Dynamic Modeling of Students' Learning Styles in Adaptive Educational Systems , 2012, Informatics Educ..