Modeled responses of terrestrial ecosystems to elevated atmospheric CO2: a comparison of simulations by the biogeochemistry models of the Vegetation/Ecosystem Modeling and Analysis Project (VEMAP)

Abstract Although there is a great deal of information concerning responses to increases in atmospheric CO2 at the tissue and plant levels, there are substantially fewer studies that have investigated ecosystem-level responses in the context of integrated carbon, water, and nutrient cycles. Because our understanding of ecosystem responses to elevated CO2 is incomplete, modeling is a tool that can be used to investigate the role of plant and soil interactions in the response of terrestrial ecosystems to elevated CO2. In this study, we analyze the responses of net primary production (NPP) to doubled CO2 from 355 to 710 ppmv among three biogeochemistry models in the Vegetation/Ecosystem Modeling and Analysis Project (VEMAP): BIOME-BGC (BioGeochemical Cycles), Century, and the Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (TEM). For the conterminous United States, doubled atmospheric CO2 causes NPP to increase by 5% in Century, 8% in TEM, and 11% in BIOME-BGC. Multiple regression analyses between the NPP response to doubled CO2 and the mean annual temperature and annual precipitation of biomes or grid cells indicate that there are negative relationships between precipitation and the response of NPP to doubled CO2 for all three models. In contrast, there are different relationships between temperature and the response of NPP to doubled CO2 for the three models: there is a negative relationship in the responses of BIOME-BGC, no relationship in the responses of Century, and a positive relationship in the responses of TEM. In BIOME-BGC, the NPP response to doubled CO2 is controlled by the change in transpiration associated with reduced leaf conductance to water vapor. This change affects soil water, then leaf area development and, finally, NPP. In Century, the response of NPP to doubled CO2 is controlled by changes in decomposition rates associated with increased soil moisture that results from reduced evapotranspiration. This change affects nitrogen availability for plants, which influences NPP. In TEM, the NPP response to doubled CO2 is controlled by increased carboxylation which is modified by canopy conductance and the degree to which nitrogen constraints cause down-regulation of photosynthesis. The implementation of these different mechanisms has consequences for the spatial pattern of NPP responses, and represents, in part, conceptual uncertainty about controls over NPP responses. Progress in reducing these uncertainties requires research focused at the ecosystem level to understand how interactions between the carbon, nitrogen, and water cycles influence the response of NPP to elevated atmospheric CO2.

[1]  C. Körner,et al.  Carbon and water fluxes in a calcareous grassland under elevated CO2 , 1997 .

[2]  David W. Kicklighter,et al.  Equilibrium Responses of Soil Carbon to Climate Change: Empirical and Process-Based Estimates , 1995 .

[3]  S. Running,et al.  Generalization of a forest ecosystem process model for other biomes, Biome-BGC, and an application for global-scale models. Scaling processes between leaf and landscape levels , 1993 .

[4]  A. McGuire,et al.  Interactions between carbon and nitrogen dynamics in estimating net primary productivity for potential vegetation in North America , 1992 .

[5]  H. Mooney,et al.  1 – Tree Responses to Elevated CO2 and Implications for Forests , 1996 .

[6]  S. Running,et al.  A general model of forest ecosystem processes for regional applications I. Hydrologic balance, canopy gas exchange and primary production processes , 1988 .

[7]  C. Field,et al.  Stimulation of grassland nitrogen cycling under carbon dioxide enrichment , 1997, Oecologia.

[8]  Steven W. Running,et al.  Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group 5-1994 Testing Forest-BGC Ecosystem Process Simulations Across a Climatic Gradient in Oregon , 2018 .

[9]  F. Day,et al.  Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 on fine root length and distribution in an oak‐palmetto scrub ecosystem in central Florida , 1996 .

[10]  E. Rastetter,et al.  Potential Net Primary Productivity in South America: Application of a Global Model. , 1991, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[11]  Thomas H. Painter,et al.  Climatic, edaphic, and biotic controls over storage and turnover of carbon in soils , 1994 .

[12]  A. Knapp,et al.  Water vapour fluxes and their impact under elevated CO2 in a C4‐tallgrass prairie , 1997 .

[13]  Harold A. Mooney,et al.  Carbon dioxide and terrestrial ecosystems , 1997 .

[14]  S. Running,et al.  FOREST-BGC, A general model of forest ecosystem processes for regional applications. II. Dynamic carbon allocation and nitrogen budgets. , 1991, Tree physiology.

[15]  F. Chapin,et al.  8 – The Jasper Ridge CO2 Experiment: Design and Motivation , 1996 .

[16]  Christopher B. Field,et al.  Predicting responses of photosynthesis and root fraction to elevated [CO2]a: interactions among carbon, nitrogen, and growth* , 1994 .

[17]  B. Kimball.  Carbon Dioxide and Agricultural Yield: An Assemblage and Analysis of 430 Prior Observations1 , 1983 .

[18]  S. Idso,et al.  Plant responses to atmospheric CO2 enrichment in the face of environmental constraints: a review of the past 10 years' research , 1994 .

[19]  A. McGuire,et al.  Productivity response of climax temperate forests to elevated temperature and carbon dioxide: a north american comparison between two global models , 1993 .

[20]  B. Drake.  The impact of rising CO2 on ecosystem production , 1992 .

[21]  Peter S. Curtis,et al.  A meta‐analysis of leaf gas exchange and nitrogen in trees grown under elevated carbon dioxide , 1996 .

[22]  C. Körner,et al.  Responses to elevated carbon dioxide in artificial tropical ecosystems. , 1992, Science.

[23]  W. Parton,et al.  Dynamics of C, N, P and S in grassland soils: a model , 1988 .

[24]  Xiangming Xiao,et al.  Equilibrium responses of global net primary production and carbon storage to doubled atmospheric carbon dioxide: Sensitivity to changes in vegetation nitrogen concentration , 1997 .

[25]  Edward B. Rastetter,et al.  Validating models of ecosystem response to global change , 1996 .

[26]  Robert J. Scholes,et al.  Observations and modeling of biomass and soil organic matter dynamics for the grassland biome worldwide , 1993 .

[27]  P. Curtis,et al.  Soil Microbial Communities Beneath Populus Grandidentata Grown Under Elevated Atmospheric CO2 , 1996 .

[28]  B. Drake,et al.  12 – Long-Term Elevated CO2 Exposure in a Chesapeake Bay Wetland: Ecosystem Gas Exchange, Primary Production, and Tissue Nitrogen , 1996 .

[29]  Walter C. Oechel,et al.  Recent change of Arctic tundra ecosystems from a net carbon dioxide sink to a source , 1993, Nature.

[30]  F. Chapin,et al.  Decomposition of litter produced under elevated CO2: Dependence on plant species and nutrient supply , 1997 .

[31]  C. Field,et al.  CO2 effects on the water budget of grassland microcosm communities , 1997 .

[32]  James S. Clark,et al.  Terrestrial biotic responses to environmental change and feedbacks to climate , 1996 .

[33]  S. Running,et al.  8 – Generalization of a Forest Ecosystem Process Model for Other Biomes, BIOME-BGC, and an Application for Global-Scale Models , 1993 .

[34]  D. Schimel,et al.  CONTINENTAL SCALE VARIABILITY IN ECOSYSTEM PROCESSES: MODELS, DATA, AND THE ROLE OF DISTURBANCE , 1997 .

[35]  P. Jarvis,et al.  The Direct Effects of Increase in the Global Atmospheric CO2 Concentration on Natural and Commercial Temperate Trees and Forests , 1989 .

[36]  R. McMurtrie,et al.  Modifying existing forest growth models to take account of effects of elevated CO2 , 1992 .

[37]  Yude Pan,et al.  The importance of climate and soils for estimates of net primary production: a sensitivity analysis with the terrestrial ecosystem model , 1996 .

[38]  A. Knapp,et al.  9 – Ecosystem-Level Responses of Tallgrass Prairie to Elevated CO2 , 1996 .

[39]  W. Parton,et al.  A general model for soil organic matter dynamics: sensitivity to litter chemistry, texture and management. , 1994 .

[40]  H. Mooney,et al.  PREDICTING ECOSYSTEM RESPONSES TO ELEVATED CO2 CONCENTRATIONS , 1991 .

[41]  Ramakrishna R. Nemani,et al.  The VEMAP integrated database for modelling United States ecosystem/vegetation sensitivity to climate change , 1995 .

[42]  S. Running,et al.  Simulated dry matter yields for aspen and spruce stands in the North American boreal forest , 1992 .

[43]  S. B. Idso,et al.  Increasing atmospheric CO2: effects on crop yield, water use and climate , 1983 .

[44]  Stan D. Wullschleger,et al.  Productivity and compensatory responses of yellow-poplar trees in elevated C02 , 1992, Nature.

[45]  W. Parton,et al.  Analysis of factors controlling soil organic matter levels in Great Plains grasslands , 1987 .

[46]  Vemap Participants.  Vegetation/ecosystem modeling and analysis project: Comparing biogeography and biogeochemistry models in a continental-scale study of terrestrial ecosystem responses to climate change and CO2 doubling , 1995 .

[47]  D. O. Hall,et al.  Impact of climate change on grassland production and soil carbon worldwide , 1995 .

[48]  Terrestrial biogeochemical cycles: global interactions with the atmosphere and hydrology , 1991 .

[49]  G. Berntson,et al.  Nitrogen cycling in microcosms of yellow birch exposed to elevated CO2: simultaneous positive and negative below‐ground feedbacks , 1997 .

[50]  W. Oechel,et al.  10 – Direct Effects of Elevated CO2 on Arctic Plant and Ecosystem Function , 1996 .

[51]  G. Hendrey,et al.  Microbial community changes in the rhizospheres of white clover and perennial ryegrass exposed to free air carbon dioxide enrichment (FACE) , 1996 .

[52]  Jerry M. Melillo,et al.  The Role of Nitrogen in the Response of Forest Net Primary Production to Elevated Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide , 1995 .

[53]  Dale W. Johnson,et al.  Effects of CO2 and N on growth and N dynamics in ponderosa pine: results from the first two growing seasons. , 1996 .

[54]  Alan K. Knapp,et al.  Biomass Production in a Tallgrass Prairie Ecosystem Exposed to Ambient and Elevated CO"2. , 1993, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[55]  A. McGuire,et al.  Global climate change and terrestrial net primary production , 1993, Nature.

[56]  Reinhart Ceulemans,et al.  Tansley Review No. 71 Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2on woody plants , 1994 .

[57]  Ray Leuning,et al.  Modelling Stomatal Behaviour and and Photosynthesis of Eucalyptus grandis , 1990 .

[58]  Peter S. Curtis,et al.  Elevated Atmospheric CO2 Effects on Belowground Processes in C3 and C4 Estuarine Marsh Communities , 1990 .

[59]  Christian Körner,et al.  Carbon Dioxide, Populations, and Communities , 1996 .