Flow distribution in parallel microfluidic networks and its effect on concentration gradient.

The architecture of microfluidic networks can significantly impact the flow distribution within its different branches and thereby influence tracer transport within the network. In this paper, we study the flow rate distribution within a network of parallel microfluidic channels with a single input and single output, using a combination of theoretical modeling and microfluidic experiments. Within the ladder network, the flow rate distribution follows a U-shaped profile, with the highest flow rate occurring in the initial and final branches. The contrast with the central branches is controlled by a single dimensionless parameter, namely, the ratio of hydrodynamic resistance between the distribution channel and the side branches. This contrast in flow rates decreases when the resistance of the side branches increases relative to the resistance of the distribution channel. When the inlet flow is composed of two parallel streams, one of which transporting a diffusing species, a concentration variation is produced within the side branches of the network. The shape of this concentration gradient is fully determined by two dimensionless parameters: the ratio of resistances, which determines the flow rate distribution, and the Péclet number, which characterizes the relative speed of diffusion and advection. Depending on the values of these two control parameters, different distribution profiles can be obtained ranging from a flat profile to a step distribution of solute, with well-distributed gradients between these two limits. Our experimental results are in agreement with our numerical model predictions, based on a simplified 2D advection-diffusion problem. Finally, two possible applications of this work are presented: the first one combines the present design with self-digitization principle to encapsulate the controlled concentration in nanoliter chambers, while the second one extends the present design to create a continuous concentration gradient within an open flow chamber.

[1]  Charles N. Baroud,et al.  Combining rails and anchors with laser forcing for selective manipulation within 2D droplet arrays. , 2011, Lab on a chip.

[2]  Philippe Laval,et al.  A microfluidic device based on droplet storage for screening solubility diagrams. , 2007, Lab on a chip.

[3]  Charles N. Baroud,et al.  Droplet microfluidics driven by gradients of confinement , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  P. Cremer,et al.  Generating fixed concentration arrays in a microfluidic device , 2003 .

[5]  A. Griffiths,et al.  High-resolution dose–response screening using droplet-based microfluidics , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Armand Ajdari,et al.  Droplet traffic at a simple junction at low capillary numbers. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[7]  Albert Folch,et al.  A modular cell culture device for generating arrays of gradients using stacked microfluidic flows. , 2011, Biomicrofluidics.

[8]  Cheuk-Wing Li,et al.  Generation of linear and non-linear concentration gradients along microfluidic channel by microtunnel controlled stepwise addition of sample solution. , 2007, Lab on a chip.

[9]  Piotr Garstecki,et al.  Microfluidic traps for hard-wired operations on droplets. , 2013, Lab on a chip.

[10]  Wenchuan Wang,et al.  Simulation of the Generation of Solution Gradients in Microfluidic Systems Using the Lattice Boltzmann Method , 2011 .

[11]  Charles N. Baroud,et al.  Rails and anchors: guiding and trapping droplet microreactors in two dimensions. , 2011, Lab on a chip.

[12]  Luke P. Lee,et al.  Dynamic single cell culture array. , 2006, Lab on a chip.

[13]  Won Gu Lee,et al.  Generating nonlinear concentration gradients in microfluidic devices for cell studies. , 2011, Analytical chemistry.

[14]  Daniel T Chiu,et al.  Self-digitization of sample volumes. , 2010, Analytical chemistry.

[15]  Megan N. McClean,et al.  Signal processing by the HOG MAP kinase pathway , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  A. deMello,et al.  A microdroplet dilutor for high-throughput screening. , 2011, Nature chemistry.

[17]  P. Abbyad,et al.  Parallel measurements of reaction kinetics using ultralow-volumes. , 2013, Lab on a chip.

[18]  George M. Whitesides,et al.  Coding/Decoding and Reversibility of Droplet Trains in Microfluidic Networks , 2007, Science.

[19]  N. Mortensen,et al.  Reexamination of Hagen-Poiseuille flow: shape dependence of the hydraulic resistance in microchannels. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[20]  M. Heil,et al.  The propagation of low-viscosity fingers into fluid-filled branching networks , 2005, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[21]  Alex Groisman,et al.  A microfluidic chemostat for experiments with bacterial and yeast cells , 2005, Nature Methods.

[22]  Mehmet Toner,et al.  Microfluidic system for measuring neutrophil migratory responses to fast switches of chemical gradients. , 2006, Lab on a chip.

[23]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Generation of Solution and Surface Gradients Using Microfluidic Systems , 2000 .

[24]  Q. Fang,et al.  Droplet-based microfluidic flow injection system with large-scale concentration gradient by a single nanoliter-scale injection for enzyme inhibition assay. , 2012, Analytical chemistry.

[25]  Meng Sun,et al.  Generation of chemical concentration gradients in mobile droplet arrays via fragmentation of long immiscible diluting plugs. , 2013, Analytical chemistry.