Superresolution of ultrasound images using the first and second harmonic signal

This paper presents a new method of blind two-dimensional (2-D) homomorphic deconvolution and speckle reduction applied to medical ultrasound images. The deconvolution technique is based on an improved 2-D phase unwrapping scheme for pulse estimation. The input images are decomposed into minimum-phase and allpass components. The 2-D phase unwrapping is applied only to the allpass component. The 2-D phase of the minimum-phase component is derived by a Hilbert transform. The accuracy of 2-D phase unwrapping is also improved by processing small (16/spl times/16 pixels) overlapping subimages separately. This takes the spatial variance of the ultrasound pulse into account. The deconvolution algorithm is applied separately to the first and second harmonic images, producing much sharper images of approximately the same resolution and different speckle patterns. Speckle reduction is made by adding the envelope images of the deconvolved first and second harmonic images. Neither the spatial resolution nor the frame rate decreases, as the common compounding speckle reduction techniques do. The method is tested on sequences of clinical ultrasound images, resulting in high-resolution ultrasound images with reduced speckle noise.

[1]  C. W. Chen,et al.  Network approaches to two-dimensional phase unwrapping: intractability and two new algorithms. , 2000, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[2]  T. Taxt Comparison of cepstrum-based methods for radial blind deconvolution of ultrasound images , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[3]  Gabriella Cincotti,et al.  Frequency decomposition and compounding of ultrasound medical images with wavelet packets , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  F Forsberg,et al.  Ultrasonic characterization of the nonlinear properties of contrast microbubbles. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[5]  R. Stephenson A and V , 1962, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[6]  J A Jensen,et al.  A model for the propagation and scattering of ultrasound in tissue. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  T. Taxt,et al.  Two-dimensional noise-robust blind deconvolution of ultrasound images , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[8]  A. J. Allnutt Topics in Applied Physics , 1975 .

[9]  Louis A. Romero,et al.  Robust two-dimensional weighted and unweighted phase unwrapping that uses fast transforms and iterative methods , 1994 .

[10]  Alan V. Oppenheim,et al.  Discrete-time Signal Processing. Vol.2 , 2001 .

[11]  A. Petropulu,et al.  Higher order spectra based deconvolution of ultrasound images , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[12]  T. Taxt,et al.  Three-dimensional blind deconvolution of ultrasound images , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[13]  F. Forsberg,et al.  Higher order versus second order statistics in ultrasound image deconvolution , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[14]  C. Burckhardt Speckle in ultrasound B-mode scans , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.

[15]  R.L. Galloway,et al.  A frequency diversity process for speckle reduction in real-time ultrasonic images , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[16]  L Pourcelot,et al.  Clinical use of ultrasound tissue harmonic imaging. , 1999, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[17]  Olov Marklund An anisotropic evolution formulation applied in 2-D unwrapping of discontinuous phase surfaces , 2001, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[18]  José M. N. Leitão,et al.  The ZπM algorithm: a method for interferometric image reconstruction in SAR/SAS , 2002, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[19]  Torfinn Taxt,et al.  Homomorphic deconvolution of medical ultrasound images using a Bayesian model for phase unwrapping , 1996, 1996 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings.

[20]  Rolf Unbehauen,et al.  New algorithms of two-dimensional blind deconvolution , 1995 .

[21]  Dennis C. Ghiglia,et al.  Two-Dimensional Phase Unwrapping: Theory, Algorithms, and Software , 1998 .

[22]  José Dias,et al.  The Z π M Algorithm for Interferometric Image Reconstruction in SAR / SAS , 2001 .

[23]  J. Goodman Some fundamental properties of speckle , 1976 .

[24]  C. W. Chen,et al.  Two-dimensional phase unwrapping with use of statistical models for cost functions in nonlinear optimization. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[25]  N. Bilgutay,et al.  Analysis and Comparison of Some Frequency Compounding Algorithms for the Reduction of Ultrasonic Clutter , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[26]  T. Taxt,et al.  Restoration of medical ultrasound images using two-dimensional homomorphic deconvolution , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[27]  Paul W. Fieguth,et al.  Probabilistic cost functions for network flow phase unwrapping , 2000, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[28]  J C Bamber,et al.  Adaptive filtering for reduction of speckle in ultrasonic pulse-echo images. , 1986, Ultrasonics.

[29]  Igor Lyuboshenko,et al.  Phase unwrapping for interferometric synthetic aperture radar by use of Helmholtz equation eigenfunctions and the first Green’s identity , 1999 .

[30]  F. G. Sommer,et al.  Frequency diversity speckle processing. , 1987, Ultrasonic imaging.

[31]  T. Loupas,et al.  A comparison of three different filters for speckle reduction of Doppler spectra. , 1990, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[32]  Pai-Chi Li,et al.  Harmonic leakage and image quality degradation in tissue harmonic imaging. , 2001, IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control.