Design Parameter Estimation using a Modified QFD Method to Improve Customer Perception

This article presents an integrated approach to optimize cost while respecting the customer perception of a product using a modified Quality Function Deployment (QFD) method. This QFD method helps a design team to determine the effect of various design strategies for customer satisfaction. The new QFD method uses a two-phased approach for finding an optimum design strategy. During the first phase, the design team sets goals for customer perception for each customer attribute and relates them to those of its competitors (benchmarking); then, in the second phase, a goal-based model with a separated, mixed integer structure is used to minimize cost while respecting customer desires. The model defines fixed cost as a major improvement in design solutions such as changing parts, materials, or operational mechanisms. It also defines variable cost as a minor improvement in the current design solution. An illustrative example is given to demonstrate the use of the method, and a sensitivity analysis for budget limitation is shown. The method is applicable to a wide spectrum of design problems where, setting preferences over competitors’ products and respecting budget limitations are the major criteria in the design strategy.

[1]  John J. Cristiano,et al.  Application of multiattribute decision analysis to quality function deployment for target setting , 2001, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C.

[2]  Kwang-Jae Kim,et al.  Determination of an Optimal Set of Design Requirements Using House of Quality , 1998 .

[3]  Nam P. Suh,et al.  Axiomatic Design: Advances and Applications , 2001 .

[4]  Richard Y. K. Fung,et al.  Design targets determination for inter‐dependent product attributes in QFD using fuzzy inference , 1999 .

[5]  Michael A. Mullens,et al.  AN AHP FRAMEWORK FOR PRIORITIZING CUSTOMER REQUIREMENTS IN QFD: AN INDUSTRIALIZED HOUSING APPLICATION , 1994 .

[6]  George L. Vairaktarakis,et al.  Optimization tools for design and marketing of new/improved products using the house of quality , 1999 .

[7]  V. Bouchereau,et al.  Analytical approaches to QFD , 1999 .

[8]  Biren Prasad,et al.  Review of QFD and related deployment techniques , 1998 .

[9]  House of quality: A fuzzy logic-based requirements analysis , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  Juite Wang,et al.  Fuzzy outranking approach to prioritize design requirements in quality function deployment , 1999 .

[11]  A. Griffin Evaluating QFD's Use in US Firms as a Process for Developing Products , 1992 .

[12]  Kwang-Jae Kim,et al.  EFFECT AND CHOICE OF THE WEIGHTING SCALE IN QFD , 2000 .

[13]  L. Vanegas,et al.  Application of new fuzzy-weighted average (NFWA) method to engineering design evaluation , 2001 .

[14]  J. Hauser,et al.  The House of Quality , 1988 .

[15]  Christopher C. Yang,et al.  Optimum tolerance design for complex assemblies using hierarchical interval constraint networks , 2003, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[16]  Kwang-Jae Kim,et al.  Complexity reduction of a design problem in QFD using decomposition , 2000, J. Intell. Manuf..

[17]  Ming-Lu Wu,et al.  Quality function deployment: A literature review , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  Hamdi A. Bashir,et al.  Project Estimation from Feasibility Study until Completion: A Quantitative Methodology , 2001, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[19]  Herbert Moskowitz,et al.  QFD optimizer: a novice friendly quality function deployment decision support system for optimizing product designs , 1997 .

[20]  Sevin Sozer,et al.  Product planning in quality function deployment using a combined analytic network process and goal programming approach , 2003 .

[21]  Kwang-Jae Kim,et al.  Consistency check of a house of quality chart , 2002 .

[22]  Altshuller Creativity As an Exact Science , 1984 .

[23]  Gerald W. Evans,et al.  Fuzzy multicriteria models for quality function deployment , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[24]  Yasuhisa Tsuda QFD Models for Concurrent Engineering Development Processes of Automobiles , 1995 .

[25]  Kwang-Jae Kim DETERMINING OPTIMAL DESIGN CHARACTERISTIC LEVELS IN QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT , 1997 .

[26]  Seyed Hossein Iranmanesh,et al.  AN INVESTIGATION OF RANK RESERVAL WHEN USING FUZZY IMPORTANCE LEVELS IN QFD ANALYSIS , 2003 .

[27]  Madhan Shridhar Phadke,et al.  Quality Engineering Using Robust Design , 1989 .

[28]  Biren Prasad,et al.  A concurrent function deployment technique for a workgroup-based engineering design process , 2000 .