Leadership for Organisational Learning and Improved Student Outcomes—What Do We Know?

The Leadership for Organisational Learning and Student Outcomes (LOLSO) Research Project addresses the need to extend present understandings of school reform initiatives that aim to change school practices with the intention of supporting enhanced student learning. In this article results from LOLSO's teacher surveys ('teacher voice') and student surveys ('pupil voice') are organised around six of the project's major research questions: how is the concept of organisational learning (OL) defined in Australian secondary schools (teacher voice)? What leadership practices promote OL in schools (teacher voice)? What are some outcomes of schooling other than academic achievement (pupil voice)? What are the relationships between the non-academic and academic outcomes of schooling? Do school leadership and/or organisational learning contribute to student outcomes? What other factors contribute to student outcomes? The answers to these questions lead to four clear implications relating to distributive leadership, development, context, and a broader understanding of student outcomes. The answers also raise concerns about the current emphasis on transactional leadership, that is school leadership that overemphasises the managerial or strategic.

[1]  K. Osterman.  Students' Need for Belonging in the School Community , 2000 .

[2]  M. Maden.  Success against the odds, five years on : revisiting effective schools in disadvantaged areas , 2001 .

[3]  A. Harris,et al.  Subject leadership and school improvement , 2000 .

[4]  M. Fielding.  Target Setting, Policy Pathology and Student Perspectives: learning to labour in new times , 1999 .

[5]  P. Sammons,et al.  Views of Pupils, Parents and Teachers: Key Indicators of Effectiveness and for Improvement , 2001 .

[6]  A. W. Hoy,et al.  Collective Teacher Efficacy: Its Meaning, Measure, and Impact on Student Achievement , 2000 .

[7]  H. Silins,et al.  Leadership and school results , 2002 .

[8]  Mark Berends,et al.  Teacher-Reported Effects of New American School Designs: Exploring Relationships to Teacher Background and School Context , 2000 .

[9]  P. Hersey,et al.  Management of Organizational Behavior: Utilizing Human Resources , 1971 .

[10]  M. Crawford,et al.  Effective Educational Leadership , 2003 .

[11]  K. Riley,et al.  Leadership for Change and School Reform: International Perspectives , 2000 .

[12]  L. Feinstein.  The relative economic importance of academic, psychological and behavioural attributes developed on childhood , 2000 .

[13]  Delbert S. Elliott,et al.  Delinquency and dropout , 1974 .

[14]  B. Mcgaw.  Making Schools More Effective: Report of the Australian Effective Schools Project. , 1992 .

[15]  S. Legg,et al.  Education for All , 2007, Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals.

[16]  H. Silins,et al.  Leadership for Organisational Learning and Student Outcomes. The Lolso Project: The First Report of an Australian Three Year Study of International Significance. , 1999 .

[17]  Susanna Loeb,et al.  School Size in Chicago Elementary Schools: Effects on Teachers' Attitudes and Students' Achievement , 2000 .

[18]  Jean Rudduck,et al.  Pupil Participation and Pupil Perspective: 'carving a new order of experience' , 2000 .

[19]  B. Mulford,et al.  When will they ever Learn?: Another failure of centrally-imposed change , 1999 .

[20]  B. Mulford.  The Global Challenge , 2002 .

[21]  H. Silins,et al.  Leadership for Organisational Learning in Australian Secondary Schools , 2000 .

[22]  M. Galton.  BIG CHANGE QUESTIONS – "Should Pedagogical Change Be Mandated?" `Dumbing Down' on Classroom Standards: the perils of a technician's approach to Pedagogy , 2000 .

[23]  R. Heck.  Examining the Impact of School Quality on School Outcomes and Improvement: A Value-Added Approach , 2000 .

[24]  Making Schools More Effective. , 1986 .

[25]  Halia Silins,et al.  Students as a central concern: School, students and outcome measures , 2000 .