Ultraviolet light output of compact fluorescent lamps: comparison to conventional incandescent and halogen residential lighting sources

Patients with photosensitive dermatologic and systemic diseases often question the ultraviolet light (UVL) output of household lighting sources. Such individuals have increasing concern about potential UVL exposure from energy-efficient compact fluorescent lamps (CFL), as little data have been presented concerning their UVL output. The objective was to compare, via pilot study, the levels of ultraviolet A (UVA) and ultraviolet B (UVB) leak between residential lighting sources. Equivalent wattage CFL, incandescent and halogen bulbs were purchased from local retailers in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA. The UVA and UVB outputs of these sources were measured under controlled conditions at 10, 25, 50, 100 and 150 cm away from the light source using an IL-1700 research radiometer equipped with UVA and UVB detectors. Negligible UVB and UVA was detected at 100 and 150 cm. Therefore, data were analysed from measurements at 10, 25 and 50 cm only. The results demonstrated UVA leak highest from incandescent and halogen bulbs, and UVB leak highest from CFL. The overall UVA/UVB leak was lowest from CFL shielded during the manufacturing process. In conclusion, patients with photosensitivity have choices depending on their relative risk from different UVL wavelength spectra. UVB exposure risk may be reduced the greatest by utilising CFL with manufacturer-provided shields.

[1]  G. Plewig,et al.  Experimental reproduction of skin lesions in lupus erythematosus by UVA and UVB radiation. , 1990, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[2]  R. Sontheimer Fluorescent light photosensitivity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: comment on the article by Rihner and McGrath. , 1993, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[3]  D. Walshaw,et al.  Provocation testing in polymorphic light eruption using fluorescent ultraviolet (UV) A and UVB lamps , 2004, The British journal of dermatology.

[4]  C. Elmets,et al.  Photoexacerbation of cutaneous lupus erythematosus due to ultraviolet A emissions from a photocopier. , 1995, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[5]  C. Kallenberg,et al.  Ultraviolet light and cutaneous lupus , 2006, Lupus.

[6]  V. Sigurdsson,et al.  Decreased neutrophil skin infiltration after UVB exposure in patients with polymorphous light eruption. , 2004, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[7]  H I Maibach,et al.  Halogen lamp phototoxicity. , 1996, Dermatology.

[8]  G. C. Murthy,et al.  Polymorphous light eruption in ground crew , 2022 .

[9]  J. Epstein,et al.  Photocarcinogenesis, skin cancer, and aging. , 1983, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[10]  H. Mcgrath,et al.  Fluorescent light photosensitivity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. , 1992, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[11]  Robert M. Sayre,et al.  Dermatological Risk of Indoor Ultraviolet Exposure from Contemporary Lighting Sources¶,†,‡,§ , 2004, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[12]  H. Weelden,et al.  Light-induced skin lesions in lupus erythematosus: photobiological studies , 2004, Archives of Dermatological Research.

[13]  James Varani,et al.  Mechanisms of photoaging and chronological skin aging. , 2002, Archives of dermatology.

[14]  F. Urbach,et al.  Effect of Indoor Lighting on Normal Skin , 1985, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.