Sea‐level change, glacial rebound and mantle viscosity fornorthern Europe

Northwestern Europe remains a key region for testing models of glacial isostasy because of the good geological record of crustal response to the glacial unloading since the time of the Last Glacial Maximum. Models for this rebound and associated sea-level change require a detailed knowledge of the ice-sheet geometry, including the ice thickness through time. Existing ice-sheet reconstructions are strongly model-dependent, and inversions of sea-level data for the mantle response may be a function of the model assumptions. Thus inverse solutions for the sea-level data are sought that include both ice- and earth-model parameters as unknowns. Sea-level data from Fennoscandia, the North Sea, the British Isles and the Atlantic and English Channel coasts have been evaluated and incorporated into the solutions. The starting ice sheet for Fennoscandia is based on a reconstruction of a model by Denton & Hughes (1981) that is characterized by quasi-parabolic cross-sections and symmetry about the load centre. Both global (northwestern Europe as a whole) and regional (subsets of the data) solutions have been made for earth-model parameters and ice-height scaling parameters. The key results are as follows. (1) The response of the upper mantle to the changing ice and water loads is spatially relatively homogenous across Scandinavia, the North Sea and the British Isles. (2) This response can be adequately modelled by an effective elastic lithosphere of thickness 65–85 km and by an effective upper-mantle viscosity (from the base of the lithosphere to the 670 km depth seismic discontinuity) of about 3–4×1020 Pa s. The effective lower-mantle viscosity is at least an order of magnitude greater. (3) The ice thickness over Scandinavia at the time of maximum glaciation was only about 2000 m, much less than the 3400 m assumed in the Denton & Hughes model. (4) The ice profiles are asymmetric about the centre of the ice sheet with those over the western part being consistent with quasi-parabolic functions whereas the ice heights over the eastern and southern regions increase much more slowly with distance inwards from the ice margin.

[1]  R. Armstrong,et al.  The Physics of Glaciers , 1981 .

[2]  I. Cayo.  Shore displacement data based on lake isolations confirm the postglacial part of the Swedish Geochronological Time Scale , 1992 .

[3]  K. Lambeck,et al.  Late Pleistocene and Holocene sea-level change along the Australian coast , 1990 .

[4]  K. Svedhage.  Shore displacement during late Weichselian and early Holocene in the Risveden area, sw Sweden , 1985 .

[5]  K. Lambeck.  Shoreline displacement in southern-central Sweden and the evolution of the Baltic Sea , 1999 .

[6]  S. Wastegård.  Late Weichselian - early Holocene marine stratigraphy in southwestern Värmland and northwestern Dalsland, SW Sweden , 1995 .

[7]  D. L. Anderson,et al.  Preliminary reference earth model , 1981 .

[8]  J. J. Møller.  Holocene shore displacement at Nappstraumen, Lofoten, North Norway , 1984 .

[9]  K. Lambeck,et al.  Glacial rebound of the British Isles—III. Constraints on mantle viscosity , 1996 .

[10]  H. Thomsen.  Late Weichselian shore-level displacement on Nord-Jæren, south-west Norway , 1982 .

[11]  W. Peltier,et al.  On postglacial geoid subsidence over the equatorial oceans , 1991 .

[12]  H. Hyvärinen.  Relative sea-level changes near Helsinki, southern Finland during early Litorina times , 1980 .

[13]  D. Moe,et al.  The early Holocene climate and sea-level changes in Lofoten and Vesterålen, North Norway , 1986 .

[14]  N. Shackleton.  Oxygen isotopes, ice volume and sea level , 1987 .

[15]  Kurt Lambeck,et al.  Glacial rebound of the British Isles—II. A high-resolution, high-precision model , 1993 .

[16]  K. Lambeck,et al.  The melting history of the late Pleistocene Antarctic ice sheet , 1988, Nature.

[17]  G. Boulton,et al.  Glacial geology and glaciology of the last mid-latitude ice sheets , 1985, Journal of the Geological Society.

[18]  K. Okamoto,et al.  A New Thiamine Derivative, S-Benzoylthiamine O-Monophosphate , 1961, Science.

[19]  S. Björck,et al.  Late Weichselian shore displacement at Hunneberg, southern Sweden, indicating complex uplift , 1982 .

[20]  B. Berglund.  Littorina Transgressions in Blekinge, South Sweden a Preliminary Survey , 1971 .

[21]  M. Eronen.  The history of the Litorina Sea and associated Holocene events , 1974 .

[22]  H. Sejrup,et al.  Weichselian land-sea interactions: Western Norway-Norwegian sea , 1990 .

[23]  K. Anundsen.  Marine transgression in Younger Dryas in Norway , 1978 .

[24]  L. Lliboutry.  Rheological properties of the asthenosphere from Fennoscandian data , 1971 .

[25]  H. Ramfjord.  On the Late Weichselian and Flandrian shoreline displacement in Nærøy, Nord-Trøndelag, Norway , 1982 .

[26]  Kurt Lambeck,et al.  Tests of glacial rebound models for Fennoscandinavia based on instrumented sea‐ and lake‐level records , 1998 .

[27]  K. Lambeck,et al.  Glacial rebound and relative sea-level variations: a new appraisal , 1987 .

[28]  Ragnar. Lidén.  Den senkvartära strandförskjutningens förlopp och kronologi i Ångermanland , 1938 .

[29]  K. Lambeck.  On the choice of timescale in glacial rebound modelling: mantle viscosity estimates and the radiocarbon timescale , 1998 .

[30]  K. Lambeck,et al.  Holocene glacial rebound and sea-level change in NW Europe , 1990 .

[31]  J. Møller.  Holocene transgression maximum about 6000 years BP at Ramså, Vesterålen, North Norway , 1986 .

[32]  J. Mitrovica,et al.  Haskell [1935] revisited , 1996 .

[33]  G. Miller,et al.  The Last great ice sheets , 1981 .

[34]  T. Vorren,et al.  A shore displacement curve from the Tromso district, North Norway , 1983 .

[35]  E. Bird,et al.  Shore displacement and the origin of the lagoon at Brusand, southwestern Norway , 1986 .

[36]  T. Påsse.  Shore displacement during the Late Weichselian and Holocene in the Sandsjöbacka area, SW Sweden , 1987 .

[37]  T. L. Rasmussen,et al.  Synchronized TerrestrialAtmospheric Deglacial Records Around the North Atlantic , 1996, Science.

[38]  W. Fjeldskaar.  Viscosity and thickness of the asthenosphere detected from the Fennoscandian uplift , 1994 .

[39]  J. Mangerud,et al.  Late Weichselian and holocene sea-level history for a cross-section of western Norway , 1987 .

[40]  P. Johnston.  The effect of spatially non‐uniform water loads on prediction of sea‐level change , 1993 .

[41]  K. Lambeck.  Late Pleistocene and Holocene sea-level change in Greece and south-western Turkey: a separation of eustatic, isostatic and tectonic contributions , 1995 .

[42]  N. A. Haskell.  The Motion of a Viscous Fluid Under a Surface Load , 1935 .

[43]  K. Lambeck.  CONSTRAINTS ON THE LATE WEICHSELIAN ICE SHEET OVER THE BARENTS SEA FROM OBSERVATIONS OF RAISED SHORELINES , 1995 .

[44]  J. Mitrovica.  Reply to comment by L. Cathles and W. Fjeldskaar on 'The inference of mantle viscosity from an inversion of the Fennoscandian relaxation spectrum' , 1993 .

[45]  K. Lambeck.  Sea-level change along the French Atlantic and Channel coasts since the time of the Last Glacial Maximum , 1997 .

[46]  N. A. Haskell.  The Viscosity of the Asthenosphere , 1937 .

[47]  C. Grabowski.  Lactic Acid Accumulation as a Cause of Hypoxia-Induced Malformations in the Chick Embryo , 1961, Science.

[48]  K. Anundsen.  Changes in shore-level and ice-front position in Late Weichsel and Holocene, southern Norway , 1985 .

[49]  W. Peltier.  Mantle Viscosity and Ice-Age Ice Sheet Topography , 1996, Science.

[50]  K. Lambeck.  Shoreline displacements in southern-central Sweden and the evolution of the Baltic Sea since the last maximum glaciation , 1999, Journal of the Geological Society.

[51]  S. Björck.  A review of the history of the Baltic Sea, 13.0-8.0 ka BP , 1995 .

[52]  M. Houmark‐Nielsen.  The last interglacial-glacial cycle in Denmark , 1989 .

[53]  J. Steers,et al.  Holocene Sea Level Changes in the Netherlands , 1962 .

[54]  G. Nolet,et al.  Deep Seismic Expression of an Ancient Plate Boundary in Europe , 1994, Science.

[55]  K. Lambeck.  Late Devensian and Holocene shorelines of the British Isles and North Sea from models of glacio-hydro-isostatic rebound , 1995, Journal of the Geological Society.

[56]  C. Baeteman,et al.  Holocene evolution of relative sea-level and local mean high water spring tides in Belgium - a first assessment , 1995 .

[57]  K. Lambeck,et al.  Material versus isobaric internal boundaries in the Earth and their influence on postglacial rebound , 1997 .

[58]  W. Peltier,et al.  ICE-3G: A new global model of late Pleistocene deglaciation based upon geophysical predictions of po , 1991 .

[59]  N. Svensson.  Late weichselian and early holocene shore displacement in the central Baltic sea , 1991 .

[60]  W. Peltier,et al.  Ice Age Paleotopography , 1994, Science.

[61]  K. Lambeck.  Limits on the areal extent of the Barents Sea ice sheet in Late Weichselian time , 1996 .

[62]  B. Gutenberg.  Changes in sea level, postglacial uplift, and mobility of the earth's interior , 1941 .

[63]  H. Jeffreys,et al.  Isostatic Movement in Finland: Review@@@On the Upheaval of Land in Fennoscandia , 1940 .

[64]  K. Lambeck,et al.  A Lateglacial age for the Main Rock Platform, western Scotland , 1996 .

[65]  J. Donner,et al.  The dating of the Holocene relative sea-level changes in Finnmark, North Norway , 1977 .

[66]  J. Kleman,et al.  Effects of glacier retreat on the outbursts of Goësvatnet, southwest Spitsbergen, SvalbardW. Schöner and M. Schöner 283-299Fennoscandian palaeoglaciology reconstructed using a glacial geological inversion model , 1997 .