The Targeting of Somatic Hypermutation Closely Resembles That of Meiotic Mutation1

We have compared the microsequence specificity of mutations introduced during somatic hypermutation (SH) and those introduced meiotically during neutral evolution. We have minimized the effects of selection by studying nonproductive (hence unselected) Ig V region genes for somatic mutations and processed pseudogenes for meiotic mutations. We find that the two sets of patterns are very similar: the mutabilities of nucleotide triplets are positively correlated between the somatic and meiotic sets. The major differences that do exist fall into three distinct categories: 1) The mutability is sharply higher at CG dinucleotides under meiotic but not somatic mutation. 2) The complementary triplets AGC and GCT are much more mutable under somatic than under meiotic mutation. 3) Triplets of the form WAN (W = T or A) are uniformly more mutable under somatic than under meiotic mutation. Nevertheless, the relative mutabilities both within this set and within the SAN (S = G or C) triplets are highly correlated with those under meiotic mutation. We also find that the somatic triplet specificity is strongly symmetric under strand exchange for A/T triplets as well as for G/C triplets in spite of the strong predominance of A over T mutations. Thus, we suggest that somatic mutation has at least two distinct components: one that specifically targets AGC/GCT triplets and another that acts as true catalysis of meiotic mutation.

[1]  A. Bird.  DNA methylation and the frequency of CpG in animal DNA. , 1980, Nucleic acids research.

[2]  D. Bogenhagen,et al.  Clusters of point mutations are found exclusively around rearranged antibody variable genes. , 1983, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  L. Staudt,et al.  Generation of antibody diversity in the immune response of BALB/c mice to influenza virus hemagglutinin. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  G. B. Golding,et al.  Patterns of somatic mutations in immunoglobulin variable genes. , 1987, Genetics.

[5]  J. Pollard,et al.  Hypothesis: somatic hypermutation by gene conversion via the error prone DNA----RNA----DNA information loop. , 1987, Molecular immunology.

[6]  N. Maizels.  Might gene conversion be the mechanism of somatic hypermutation of mammalian immunoglobulin genes? , 1989, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[7]  P. Gearhart,et al.  Boundaries of somatic mutation in rearranged immunoglobulin genes: 5' boundary is near the promoter, and 3' boundary is approximately 1 kb from V(D)J gene , 1990, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[8]  T. Manser,et al.  The efficiency of antibody affinity maturation: can the rate of B-cell division be limiting? , 1990, Immunology today.

[9]  U. Storb,et al.  Mutation pattern of immunoglobulin transgenes is compatible with a model of somatic hypermutation in which targeting of the mutator is linked to the direction of DNA replication. , 1991, The EMBO journal.

[10]  D. Labie,et al.  Molecular Evolution , 1991, Nature.

[11]  T. Manser,et al.  Position of the rearranged V kappa and its 5' flanking sequences determines the location of somatic mutations in the J kappa locus. , 1991, Journal of immunology.

[12]  Somatic hypermutation of the JC intron is markedly reduced in unrearranged kappa and H alleles and is unevenly distributed in rearranged alleles. , 1991, Journal of immunology.

[13]  N A Kolchanov,et al.  Somatic hypermutagenesis in immunoglobulin genes. II. Influence of neighbouring base sequences on mutagenesis. , 1992, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[14]  W Bains,et al.  Local sequence dependence of rate of base replacement in mammals. , 1992, Mutation research.

[15]  C. Steinberg,et al.  What limits affinity maturation of antibodies in Xenopus‐‐the rate of somatic mutation or the ability to select mutants? , 1992, The EMBO journal.

[16]  R. Rickert,et al.  Low frequencies of somatic mutation in two expressed V kappa genes: unequal distribution of mutation in 5' and 3' flanking regions. , 1993, International immunology.

[17]  G. Litman,et al.  Somatic variation precedes extensive diversification of germline sequences and combinatorial joining in the evolution of immunoglobulin heavy chain diversity , 1993, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[18]  T. Manser,et al.  Mutations in Ig V(D)J genes are distributed asymmetrically and independently of the position of V(D)J. , 1994, Journal of immunology.

[19]  S T Hess,et al.  Wide variations in neighbor-dependent substitution rates. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  R. Brezinschek,et al.  Analysis of the heavy chain repertoire of human peripheral B cells using single-cell polymerase chain reaction. , 1995, Journal of immunology.

[21]  M. Wabl,et al.  An immunoglobulin mutator that targets G.C base pairs. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  L. Wysocki,et al.  Di- and trinucleotide target preferences of somatic mutagenesis in normal and autoreactive B cells. , 1996, Journal of immunology.

[23]  M. Neuberger,et al.  Somatic hypermutation of immunoglobulin genes. , 1996, Annual review of immunology.

[24]  U. Storb,et al.  Somatic hypermutation of immunoglobulin genes is linked to transcription initiation. , 1996, Immunity.

[25]  D. Cheo,et al.  The inactivation of the XP-C gene does not affect somatic hypermutation or class switch recombination of immunoglobulin genes. , 1997, Molecular immunology.

[26]  M. Lefranc,et al.  B Lymphocytes of Xeroderma Pigmentosum or Cockayne Syndrome Patients with Inherited Defects in Nucleotide Excision Repair Are Fully Capable of Somatic Hypermutation of Immunoglobulin Genes , 1997, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[27]  M. Wabl,et al.  Mismatch repair co-opted by hypermutation. , 1998, Science.

[28]  P. Wu,et al.  Promoter-associated displacement of hypermutations. , 1998, International immunology.

[29]  R. Tarone,et al.  Increased Hypermutation at G and C Nucleotides in Immunoglobulin Variable Genes from Mice Deficient in the MSH2 Mismatch Repair Protein , 1998, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[30]  Green,et al.  Somatic hypermutation of immunoglobulin genes is independent of the Bloom's syndrome DNA helicase , 1998, Clinical and experimental immunology.

[31]  M. Neuberger,et al.  TdT-accessible breaks are scattered over the immunoglobulin V domain in a constitutively hypermutating B cell line. , 1998, Immunity.

[32]  C. Milstein,et al.  Hot spot focusing of somatic hypermutation in MSH2-deficient mice suggests two stages of mutational targeting. , 1998, Immunity.

[33]  N. de Wind,et al.  Hypermutation of Immunoglobulin Genes in Memory B Cells of DNA Repair–deficient Mice , 1998, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[34]  P. Lipsky,et al.  Somatic hypermutation of human immunoglobulin heavy chain genes: targeting of RGYW motifs on both DNA strands , 1998, European journal of immunology.

[35]  F. Delbos,et al.  Mismatch repair deficiency interferes with the accumulation of mutations in chronically stimulated B cells and not with the hypermutation process. , 1998, Immunity.

[36]  E. Spanopoulou,et al.  Immunoglobulin gene hypermutation in germinal centers is independent of the RAG‐1 V(D)J recombinase , 1998, Immunological reviews.

[37]  R. Staden,et al.  Both DNA strands of antibody genes are hypermutation targets. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  T. Kunkel,et al.  Altered spectra of hypermutation in antibodies from mice deficient for the DNA mismatch repair protein PMS2. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  R. S. Harris,et al.  Somatic hypermutation and the three R's: repair, replication and recombination. , 1999, Mutation research.

[40]  T. Gojobori,et al.  A simple method for estimating the intensity of purifying selection in protein-coding genes. , 1999, Molecular biology and evolution.

[41]  Thomas B. Kepler,et al.  Enhanced Evolvability in Immunoglobulin V Genes Under Somatic Hypermutation , 1999, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[42]  J. Spencer,et al.  Characteristics of sequences around individual nucleotide substitutions in IgVH genes suggest different GC and AT mutators. , 1999, Journal of immunology.

[43]  M. Flajnik,et al.  Mutational pattern of the nurse shark antigen receptor gene (NAR) is similar to that of mammalian Ig genes and to spontaneous mutations in evolution: the translesion synthesis model of somatic hypermutation. , 1999, International immunology.

[44]  Thomas B. Kepler,et al.  The Nucleotide-Replacement Spectrum Under Somatic Hypermutation Exhibits Microsequence Dependence That Is Strand-Symmetric and Distinct from That Under Germline Mutation1 , 2000, The Journal of Immunology.