Spatiotemporal microbial single‐cell analysis using a high‐throughput microfluidics cultivation platform

Cell‐to‐cell heterogeneity typically evolves due to a manifold of biological and environmental factors and special phenotypes are often relevant for the fate of the whole population but challenging to detect during conventional analysis. We demonstrate a microfluidic single‐cell cultivation platform that incorporates several hundred growth chambers, in which isogenic bacteria microcolonies growing in cell monolayers are tracked by automated time‐lapse microscopy with spatiotemporal resolution. The device was not explicitly developed for a specific organism, but has a very generic configuration suitable for various different microbial organisms. In the present study, we analyzed Corynebacterium glutamicum microcolonies, thereby generating complete lineage trees and detailed single‐cell data on division behavior and morphology in order to demonstrate the platform's overall capabilities. Furthermore, the occurrence of spontaneously induced stress in individual C. glutamicum cells was investigated by analyzing strains with genetically encoded reporter systems and optically visualizing SOS response. The experiments revealed spontaneous SOS induction in the absence of any external trigger comparable to results obtained by flow cytometry (FC) analyzing cell samples from conventional shake flask cultivation. Our microfluidic setup delivers detailed single‐cell data with spatial and temporal resolution; complementary information to conventional FC results. © 2015 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry

[1]  Clinton C. Dawson,et al.  “Persisters”: Survival at the Cellular Level , 2011, PLoS pathogens.

[2]  Wolfgang Wiechert,et al.  Microfluidic growth chambers with optical tweezers for full spatial single-cell control and analysis of evolving microbes. , 2013, Journal of microbiological methods.

[3]  Julia Frunzke,et al.  Monitoring of population dynamics of Corynebacterium glutamicum by multiparameter flow cytometry , 2012, Microbial biotechnology.

[4]  Wolfgang Wiechert,et al.  Single-cell microfluidics: opportunity for bioprocess development. , 2014, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[5]  Michael Unser,et al.  A chemostat array enables the spatio-temporal analysis of the yeast proteome , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Felix J. H. Hol,et al.  Zooming in to see the bigger picture: Microfluidic and nanofabrication tools to study bacteria , 2014, Science.

[7]  Philippe Nghe,et al.  Single-Cell Dynamics Reveals Sustained Growth during Diauxic Shifts , 2013, PloS one.

[8]  G. Gould,et al.  Quantal microbiology , 2000, Letters in Applied Microbiology.

[9]  A. Schmid,et al.  Single-cell analysis in biotechnology, systems biology, and biocatalysis. , 2012, Annual review of chemical and biomolecular engineering.

[10]  M. Bott,et al.  Population Heterogeneity in Corynebacterium glutamicum ATCC 13032 Caused by Prophage CGP3 , 2008, Journal of bacteriology.

[11]  M. Inui,et al.  DivS, a novel SOS‐inducible cell‐division suppressor in Corynebacterium glutamicum , 2008, Molecular microbiology.

[12]  Johannes E. Schindelin,et al.  Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.

[13]  Eric Mjolsness,et al.  Measuring single-cell gene expression dynamics in bacteria using fluorescence time-lapse microscopy , 2011, Nature Protocols.

[14]  Wolfgang Wiechert,et al.  A disposable picolitre bioreactor for cultivation and investigation of industrially relevant bacteria on the single cell level. , 2012, Lab on a chip.

[15]  K. Jaqaman,et al.  Robust single particle tracking in live cell time-lapse sequences , 2008, Nature Methods.

[16]  J. Aguirre,et al.  Improvement in the lag phase estimation of individual cells that have survived mild heat treatment , 2014 .

[17]  Wolfgang Wiechert,et al.  Live cell imaging of SOS and prophage dynamics in isogenic bacterial populations , 2015, Molecular microbiology.

[18]  S. Sørensen,et al.  A low-cost, multiplexable, automated flow cytometry procedure for the characterization of microbial stress dynamics in bioreactors , 2013, Microbial Cell Factories.

[19]  D. Kohlheyer,et al.  Rapid inoculation of single bacteria into parallel picoliter fermentation chambers , 2015 .

[20]  Tanel Tenson,et al.  Cell division in Escherichia coli cultures monitored at single cell resolution , 2008, BMC Microbiology.

[21]  D. Kohlheyer,et al.  Light-responsive control of bacterial gene expression: precise triggering of the lac promoter activity using photocaged IPTG. , 2014, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[22]  A. Ballagi,et al.  Observing Growth and Division of Large Numbers of Individual Bacteria by Image Analysis , 2004, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[23]  Gordon W. Niven,et al.  Influence of Environmental Stress on Distributions of Times to First Division in Escherichia coli Populations, as Determined by Digital-Image Analysis of Individual Cells , 2008, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[24]  G. Stephanopoulos,et al.  Review of methods to probe single cell metabolism and bioenergetics. , 2014, Metabolic engineering.

[25]  D. Kohlheyer,et al.  Analysis of SOS-Induced Spontaneous Prophage Induction in Corynebacterium glutamicum at the Single-Cell Level , 2013, Journal of bacteriology.

[26]  A. L. Koch,et al.  Growth, cell and nuclear divisions in some bacteria. , 1962, Journal of general microbiology.

[27]  Ivan Razinkov,et al.  High-throughput gene expression analysis at the level of single proteins using a microfluidic turbidostat and automated cell tracking , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  Joachim O. Rädler,et al.  Single Cell Kinetics of Phenotypic Switching in the Arabinose Utilization System of E. coli , 2014, PloS one.

[29]  T. Oh,et al.  Charting microbial phenotypes in multiplex nanoliter batch bioreactors. , 2013, Analytical chemistry.

[30]  Wolfgang Wiechert,et al.  Microfluidic Picoliter Bioreactor for Microbial Single-cell Analysis: Fabrication, System Setup, and Operation , 2013, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[31]  Wolfgang Wiechert,et al.  Technical bias of microcultivation environments on single-cell physiology. , 2015, Lab on a chip.

[32]  Jerome T. Mettetal,et al.  Stochastic switching as a survival strategy in fluctuating environments , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[33]  Wolfgang Wiechert,et al.  Beyond growth rate 0.6: Corynebacterium glutamicum cultivated in highly diluted environments , 2013, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[34]  A. Schmid,et al.  Microfluidic single-cell analysis links boundary environments and individual microbial phenotypes. , 2015, Environmental microbiology.

[35]  Katharina Nöh,et al.  Application of a Genetically Encoded Biosensor for Live Cell Imaging of L-Valine Production in Pyruvate Dehydrogenase Complex-Deficient Corynebacterium glutamicum Strains , 2014, PloS one.

[36]  Matthias Heinemann,et al.  Phenotypic bistability in Escherichia coli's central carbon metabolism , 2014, Molecular systems biology.

[37]  Rajan P Kulkarni,et al.  Advances in high-throughput single-cell microtechnologies. , 2014, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[38]  D. Kohlheyer,et al.  Beyond growth rate 0.6: What drives Corynebacterium glutamicum to higher growth rates in defined medium , 2014, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[39]  Kevin W Eliceiri,et al.  NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.

[40]  Gordon W Niven,et al.  A novel method for measuring lag times in division of individual bacterial cells using image analysis. , 2006, Journal of microbiological methods.

[41]  P. Cluzel,et al.  The single-cell chemostat: an agarose-based, microfluidic device for high-throughput, single-cell studies of bacteria and bacterial communities. , 2012, Lab on a chip.

[42]  G. Besra,et al.  MmpL Genes Are Associated with Mycolic Acid Metabolism in Mycobacteria and Corynebacteria , 2012, Chemistry & biology.