Results from Two Sided Quasi-Static (M216) and Repeatable Dynamic Rollover Test (JRS)Relative to FMVSS 216 Tests

In an attempt to find a test protocol that characterizes the rollover occupant protection capability of a passenger vehicle better than the test used in Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 216, the authors developed equipment and protocols for a modified, quasi-static roof crush test (M216, a test conducted sequentially on both sides of the roof over the A pillars at a pitch angle of 10o and roll angles of 25° and 40° respectively) and for a repeatable, dynamic rollover test called the Jordan Rollover System (JRS). The authors have conducted M216 and JRS tests on 17 production vehicles to determine roof crush and crush velocities at a number of points in the interior. These tests included complete production vehicles, body bucks at reduced weight to increase the effective roof strength-to-weight ratio, and pairs of identical vehicles where one has had the roof reinforced in a manner that is entirely hidden by the vehicle’s sheet metal and upholstery. Data from the JRS tests and the M216 tests are compared with the results of FMVSS 216 tests. Analyses of the data highlight the relative value and validity of each test methodology, its ability to predict roof performance in actual rollovers, its use in vehicle roof structure design, and its potential contribution to regulation or consumer information. Based on the roof crush and crush speed in the vicinity of front seat occupants’ heads, the authors propose a rollover crashworthiness ranking system. While static tests measure the force and deformation of the roof on the outside, the dynamic tests measure the crush on the inside during the sequence of rollover roof impacts, where it is directly related to the occupant’s survival space and injury potential.