Festina lente: Late-night thoughts on high-throughput screening of mouse behavior

A recent perspective discussed high-throughput behavioral analysis using mice, giving the overall impression that this area is lagging behind in neuroscience and biomedical research. Not only are we more optimistic about the current state of the art in behavioral neuroscience and its promise, but we also have reservations about whether high-throughput analysis is always an appropriate goal for most behavioral studies. We argue that behavioral studies should be carried out with clear goals and more regard to the intellectual context in which they have developed. In addition, behavioral studies can be performed quite easily, but this does not ensure the required validity or reliability of the particular tests used. Finally, high throughput may not always be an appropriate goal. We discuss the role of automated data collection and unique data-mining algorithms, and the question of the ethological relevance of behavioral tests.

[1]  Ilan Golani,et al.  SEE: a tool for the visualization and analysis of rodent exploratory behavior , 2001, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[2]  J. Hardy,et al.  Aβ peptide vaccination prevents memory loss in an animal model of Alzheimer's disease , 2000, Nature.

[3]  E. Nestler,et al.  Neurobehavioral assessment in the information age , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  M. Bucan,et al.  The mouse: genetics meets behaviour , 2002, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[5]  H. Lipp,et al.  Dissecting the Behaviour of Transgenic Mice: Is it the Mutation, the Genetic Background, or the Environment? , 2000, Experimental physiology.

[6]  S. J. Martin,et al.  Synaptic plasticity and memory: an evaluation of the hypothesis. , 2000, Annual review of neuroscience.

[7]  Yoav Benjamini,et al.  SEE locomotor behavior test discriminates C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mouse inbred strains across laboratories and protocol conditions. , 2003, Behavioral neuroscience.

[8]  J. Krebs,et al.  Memory in food-storing birds: from behaviour to brain , 1995, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[9]  R. Morris Spatial Localization Does Not Require the Presence of Local Cues , 1981 .

[10]  The Pierian Spring , 1992, Current Biology.

[11]  Neri Kafkafi,et al.  Darting behavior: a quantitative movement pattern designed for discrimination and replicability in mouse locomotor behavior , 2003, Behavioural Brain Research.

[12]  M. Kavaliers,et al.  Sexually dimorphic spatial learning in meadow voles Microtus pennsylvanicus and deer mice Peromyscus maniculatus. , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[13]  Douglas Wahlsten,et al.  In search of a better mouse test , 2003, Trends in Neurosciences.

[14]  Guiquan Chen,et al.  A learning deficit related to age and β-amyloid plaques in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease , 2000, Nature.

[15]  Douglas Wahlsten,et al.  Genotypic differences in ethanol sensitivity in two tests of motor incoordination. , 2003, Journal of applied physiology.

[16]  J. Crabbe,et al.  Assessment of genetic susceptibility to ethanol intoxication in mice , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  Lisa M. D'Souza,et al.  Genome sequence of the Brown Norway rat yields insights into mammalian evolution , 2004, Nature.

[18]  M. Quirk,et al.  Requirement for Hippocampal CA3 NMDA Receptors in Associative Memory Recall , 2002, Science.

[19]  J. Crabbe,et al.  Strain differences in three measures of ethanol intoxication in mice: the screen, dowel and grip strength tests , 2003, Genes, brain, and behavior.

[20]  J. Crabbe,et al.  A rating scale for wildness and ease of handling laboratory mice: results for 21 inbred strains tested in two laboratories , 2003, Genes, brain, and behavior.

[21]  R. Gerlai Gene targeting in neuroscience : the systemic approach , 1996 .

[22]  R. Rodgers Animal models of 'anxiety': where next? , 1997, Behavioural pharmacology.

[23]  J. Crabbe,et al.  Ethanol's effects on gait dynamics in mice investigated by ventral plane videography. , 2004, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[24]  R. Morris,et al.  Delay‐dependent impairment of a matching‐to‐place task with chronic and intrahippocampal infusion of the NMDA‐antagonist D‐AP5 , 1999, Hippocampus.

[25]  J. Crabbe,et al.  An analysis of the genetics of alcohol intoxication in inbred mice , 2005, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.