Touchy and Bushy: Phenotypic Plasticity and Integration in Response to Wind Stimulation in Arabidopsis thaliana

Thigmomorphogenesis, or touch response, is a widespread and ecologically significant, yet understudied, form of phenotypic plasticity in plants. I investigated uni‐ and multivariate differentiation for plasticity in response to mechanical stimulation induced by wind in several populations of Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae). I set out to test specific hypotheses based on three different scenarios predicting patterns of character correlations among morphological and life history traits in this annual opportunistic weed. A complex model of phenotypic integration, including developmental correlations and trade‐offs, fit the data remarkably well, with little variation from the environment. Wind was found to influence only the degree of branching of the plant, which had a direct effect on a component of fecundity. When exposed to no or little wind, the overall phenotypic similarities among populations seemed random; sustained winds clearly elicited distinct phenotypic syndromes, with eight populations developing a highly “bushy” (branched) phenotype, one population failing to do so, and two more showing intermediate phenotypes. Arabidopsis thaliana seems to be characterized by few and distinct plasticity syndromes, which may help our understanding of the ecology and evolution of phenotypic plasticity better than what can be achieved with more widely plastic species where distinctive patterns are difficult to recognize or to relate to specific ecological conditions.

[1]  Wei Xu,et al.  Plant responses to environmental stress: regulation and functions of the ArabidopsisTCH genes , 1997, Planta.

[2]  D. Roff.  Phenotypic Evolution — A Reaction Norm Perspective , 1999, Heredity.

[3]  Merilä,et al.  Population divergence and morphometric integration in the greenfinch (Carduelis chloris) – evolution against the trajectory of least resistance? , 1999 .

[4]  Günter P. Wagner,et al.  Adaptation and the Modular Design of Organisms , 1995, ECAL.

[5]  W. Armbruster,et al.  Causes of covariation of phenotypic traits among populations , 1996 .

[6]  W. Rice.  ANALYZING TABLES OF STATISTICAL TESTS , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[7]  M. Pigliucci,et al.  Comparative studies of reaction norms in Arabidopsis. I. Evolution of response to daylength , 2001 .

[8]  G. Wagner.  The character concept in evolutionary biology , 2001 .

[9]  S. Scheiner.  Genetics and Evolution of Phenotypic Plasticity , 1993 .

[10]  K. Loridon,et al.  Length polymorphism and allele structure of trinucleotide microsatellites in natural accessions of Arabidopsis thaliana , 1998, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[11]  F. Turano,et al.  Gamma Aminobutyric Acid (GABA) and Plant Responses to Stress , 2000 .

[12]  Genetic similarity among ecotypes of Arabidopsis thaliana estimated by analysis of restriction fragment length polymorphisms , 1993, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[13]  J. Clausen,et al.  THE BALANCE BETWEEN COHERENCE AND VARIATION IN EVOLUTION. , 1960, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  J. Cheverud.  Quantitative genetic analysis of cranial morphology in the cotton‐top (Saguinus oedipus) and saddle‐back (S. fuscicollis) tamarins , 1996 .

[15]  R. A. Cordero.  Ecophysiology of Cecropia schreberiana saplings in two wind regimes in an elfin cloud forest: growth, gas exchange, architecture and stem biomechanics. , 1999, Tree physiology.

[16]  G. Coupland,et al.  Analysis of natural allelic variation at flowering time loci in the Landsberg erecta and Cape Verde Islands ecotypes of Arabidopsis thaliana. , 1998, Genetics.

[17]  G. P. Wagner,et al.  Is the genotype-phenotype map modular? A statistical approach using mouse quantitative trait loci data. , 2000, Genetics.

[18]  L. Aarssen,et al.  Genotypic variation in fecundity allocation in Arabidopsis thaliana , 1992 .

[19]  D. Cipollini.  Costs to Flowering of the Production of a Mechanically Hardened Phenotype in Brassica napus L. , 1999, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[20]  M. Pigliucci,et al.  MUTATIONAL CONTRIBUTIONS TO GENETIC VARIANCE‐COVARIANCE MATRICES: AN EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH USING INDUCED MUTATIONS IN ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[21]  Andersson,et al.  Comparison of genetic (co)variance matrices within and between Scabiosa canescens and S. columbaria , 2000 .

[22]  J. Cheverud.  Morphological Integration in the Saddle-Back Tamarin (Saguinus fuscicollis) Cranium , 1995, The American Naturalist.

[23]  R. Terauchi,et al.  Microsatellite polymorphism in natural populations of the wild plant Arabidopsis thaliana. , 1997, Genetics.

[24]  R. Lewontin,et al.  The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change , 2022 .

[25]  F. Telewski,et al.  Thigmomorphogenesis: changes in the morphology and mechanical properties of two Populus hybrids in response to mechanical perturbation. , 2000, Tree physiology.

[26]  R. Abbott,et al.  Population genetic structure and outcrossing rate of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. , 1989, Heredity.

[27]  M. Nordborg,et al.  The effect of seed and rosette cold treatment on germination and flowering time in some Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae) ecotypes. , 1999, American journal of botany.

[28]  R. Shaw.  THE COMPARISON OF QUANTITATIVE GENETIC PARAMETERS BETWEEN POPULATIONS , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[29]  S. Fry,et al.  Arabidopsis TCH4, regulated by hormones and the environment, encodes a xyloglucan endotransglycosylase. , 1995, The Plant cell.

[30]  J. P. Grime,et al.  The ecological significance of plasticity. , 1986, Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology.

[31]  M. Pigliucci,et al.  Induced mutations: A novel tool to study phenotypic integration and evolutionary constraints in Arabidopsis thaliana , 2000 .

[32]  D. Waddle.  Matrix correlation tests support a single origin for modern humans , 1994, Nature.

[33]  T. Mackay,et al.  Quantitative trait loci for floral morphology in Arabidopsis thaliana. , 2000, Genetics.

[34]  J. M. Westerman.  Genotype-environment interaction and developmental regulation in Arabidopsis thaliana IV. Wild material; analysis , 1971, Heredity.

[35]  P. Phillips.  DESIGNING EXPERIMENTS TO MAXIMIZE THE POWER OF DETECTING CORRELATIONS , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[36]  F. Telewski,et al.  Thigmomorphogenesis: a dose response to flexing in Ulmus americana seedlings. , 1998, Tree physiology.

[37]  N. L. Biddington,et al.  The Effect of Mechanically Induced Stress on the Growth of Cauliflower, Lettuce and Celery Seedlings , 1985 .

[38]  K. Johnson,et al.  Arabidopsis thaliana responses to mechanical stimulation do not require ETR1 or EIN2. , 1998, Plant physiology.

[39]  D. Stratton.  Reaction norm functions and QTL–environment interactions for flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana , 1998, Heredity.

[40]  C. Schlichting,et al.  Reaction norms of Arabidopsis. I. Plasticity of characters and correlations across water, nutrient and light gradients , 1995 .

[41]  E. M. Meyerowitz,et al.  Arabidopsis thaliana , 2022, CABI Compendium.

[42]  S. Stearns,et al.  The effects of phenotypic plasticity on genetic correlations. , 1991, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[43]  M. Schöniger,et al.  Estimating genetic diversity of Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes with amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLP) , 2000, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[44]  M. Van Montagu,et al.  AFLP analysis of genetic diversity within and between Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes , 1999, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[45]  W. Armbruster,et al.  Covariance and decoupling of floral and vegetative traits in nine Neotropical plants: a re-evaluation of Berg's correlation-pleiades concept. , 1999, American journal of botany.

[46]  L. Aarssen,et al.  Phenotypic Plasticity of Size--Fecundity Relationships in Arabidopsis Thaliana , 1994 .

[47]  D. Morré,et al.  Touch‐Sensitive NADH Oxidase Activity of Pea and Cucumber Tendrils and Soybean Hypocotyl Sections , 2000, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[48]  C. Schlichting.  Phenotypic plasticity in Phlox , 1989, Oecologia.

[49]  D. Cipollini.  Wind-induced mechanical stimulation increases pest resistance in common bean , 1997, Oecologia.

[50]  M. Pigliucci.  Characters and Environments , 2001 .

[51]  C. Schlichting.  Phenotypic Integration and Environmental ChangeWhat are the consequences of differential phenotypic plasticity of traits , 1989 .

[52]  H. Emden,et al.  Stroking plants to reduce aphid populations. , 1990 .

[53]  G. Wagner,et al.  Evolutionarily Stable Configurations: Functional Integration and the Evolution of Phenotypic Stability , 2000 .

[54]  J. Braam,et al.  Arabidopsis TCH3 encodes a novel Ca2+ binding protein and shows environmentally induced and tissue-specific regulation. , 1994, The Plant cell.

[55]  E. Weiler,et al.  A novel stress-inducible 12-oxophytodienoate reductase from Arabidopsis thaliana provides a potential link between Brassinosteroid-action and Jasmonic-acid synthesis , 2000 .

[56]  C. Schlichting,et al.  Developmental Reaction Norms: the interactions among allometry, ontogeny and plasticity , 1996 .

[57]  S. Sultan.  Evolutionary Implications of Phenotypic Plasticity in Plants , 1987 .

[58]  Genetics and evolution of phenotypic plasticity to nutrient stress in Arabidopsis: drift, constraints or selection? , 1998 .

[59]  R. L. Berg,et al.  THE ECOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF CORRELATION PLEIADES , 1960 .

[60]  P. Campbell,et al.  The Arabidopsis XET-related gene family: environmental and hormonal regulation of expression. , 1996, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[61]  C. Schlichting,et al.  Phenotypic plasticity of annual Phlox: tests of some hypotheses. , 1984 .

[62]  C. Hardtke,et al.  Genetic similarity among Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes estimated by DNA sequence comparison , 1996, Plant Molecular Biology.

[63]  V. Grant.  Character Coherence in Natural Hybrid Populations in Plants , 1979, Botanical Gazette.

[64]  J. Cheverud,et al.  Quantitative genetics and developmental constraints on evolution by selection. , 1984, Journal of theoretical biology.

[65]  S. Steppan,et al.  PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF PHENOTYPIC COVARIANCE STRUCTURE. I. CONTRASTING RESULTS FROM MATRIX CORRELATION AND COMMON PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSES , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[66]  Reaction norms of , 1998 .

[67]  M. J. Jaffe,et al.  Thigmomorphogenesis: the effect of mechanical perturbation on plants , 1993, Plant Growth Regulation.

[68]  A. D. Bradshaw,et al.  Evolutionary Significance of Phenotypic Plasticity in Plants , 1965 .

[69]  N. L. Biddington,et al.  The effects of mechanically-induced stress in plants — a review , 1986, Plant Growth Regulation.

[70]  Günter P. Wagner,et al.  Methods for the Comparative Analysis of Variation Patterns , 1989 .

[71]  M. Jasienski,et al.  Phenotypic plasticity and similarity of DNA among genotypes of an annual plant , 1997, Heredity.

[72]  S. J. Arnold,et al.  HIERARCHICAL COMPARISON OF GENETIC VARIANCE‐COVARIANCE MATRICES. I. USING THE FLURY HIERARCHY , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[73]  D. Roff.  The evolution of the G matrix: selection or drift? , 2000, Heredity.

[74]  M. Zelditch,et al.  ONTOGENETIC VARIATION IN PATTERNS OF DEVELOPMENTAL AND FUNCTIONAL INTEGRATION IN SKULLS OF SIGMODON FULVIVENTER , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[75]  R. Sokal,et al.  Multiple regression and correlation extensions of the mantel test of matrix correspondence , 1986 .

[76]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Rain-, wind-, and touch-induced expression of calmodulin and calmodulin-related genes in Arabidopsis , 1990, Cell.