An integrated assessment modeling framework for uncertainty studies in global and regional climate change: the MIT IGSM-CAM (version 1.0)

Abstract. This paper describes a computationally efficient framework for uncertainty studies in global and regional climate change. In this framework, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Integrated Global System Model (IGSM), an integrated assessment model that couples an Earth system model of intermediate complexity to a human activity model, is linked to the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) Community Atmosphere Model (CAM). Since the MIT IGSM-CAM framework (version 1.0) incorporates a human activity model, it is possible to analyze uncertainties in emissions resulting from both uncertainties in the underlying socio-economic characteristics of the economic model and in the choice of climate-related policies. Another major feature is the flexibility to vary key climate parameters controlling the climate system response to changes in greenhouse gases and aerosols concentrations, e.g., climate sensitivity, ocean heat uptake rate, and strength of the aerosol forcing. The IGSM-CAM is not only able to realistically simulate the present-day mean climate and the observed trends at the global and continental scale, but it also simulates ENSO variability with realistic time scales, seasonality and patterns of SST anomalies, albeit with stronger magnitudes than observed. The IGSM-CAM shares the same general strengths and limitations as the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 3 (CMIP3) models in simulating present-day annual mean surface temperature and precipitation. Over land, the IGSM-CAM shows similar biases to the NCAR Community Climate System Model (CCSM) version 3, which shares the same atmospheric model. This study also presents 21st century simulations based on two emissions scenarios (unconstrained scenario and stabilization scenario at 660 ppm CO2-equivalent) similar to, respectively, the Representative Concentration Pathways RCP8.5 and RCP4.5 scenarios, and three sets of climate parameters. Results of the simulations with the chosen climate parameters provide a good approximation for the median, and the 5th and 95th percentiles of the probability distribution of 21st century changes in global mean surface air temperature from previous work with the IGSM. Because the IGSM-CAM framework only considers one particular climate model, it cannot be used to assess the structural modeling uncertainty arising from differences in the parameterization suites of climate models. However, comparison of the IGSM-CAM projections with simulations of 31 CMIP5 models under the RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios show that the range of warming at the continental scale shows very good agreement between the two ensemble simulations, except over Antarctica, where the IGSM-CAM overestimates the warming. This demonstrates that by sampling the climate system response, the IGSM-CAM, even though it relies on one single climate model, can essentially reproduce the range of future continental warming simulated by more than 30 different models. Precipitation changes projected in the IGSM-CAM simulations and the CMIP5 multi-model ensemble both display a large uncertainty at the continental scale. The two ensemble simulations show good agreement over Asia and Europe. However, the ranges of precipitation changes do not overlap – but display similar size – over Africa and South America, two continents where models generally show little agreement in the sign of precipitation changes and where CCSM3 tends to be an outlier. Overall, the IGSM-CAM provides an efficient and consistent framework to explore the large uncertainty in future projections of global and regional climate change associated with uncertainty in the climate response and projected emissions.

[1]  G. Meehl,et al.  Externally forced and internally generated decadal climate variability associated with the Interdecadal Pacific Oscillation , 2013 .

[2]  Julia C. Hargreaves,et al.  Long-term climate commitments projected with climate-carbon cycle models , 2008 .

[3]  Andrei P. Sokolov,et al.  Changing the Climate Sensitivity of an Atmospheric General Circulation Model through Cloud Radiative Adjustment , 2012 .

[4]  Sergey Paltsev,et al.  Uncertainty in Greenhouse Emissions and Costs of Atmospheric Stabilization , 2008 .

[5]  Ed Hawkins,et al.  Our evolving climate: communicating the effects of climate variability , 2011 .

[6]  John F. B. Mitchell,et al.  Carbon Dioxide and Climate. The Impact of Cloud Parameterization , 1993 .

[7]  Yuexin Liu,et al.  Modeling the emissions of nitrous oxide (N₂O) and methane (CH₄) from the terrestrial biosphere to the atmosphere , 1996 .

[8]  Karl E. Taylor,et al.  An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design , 2012 .

[9]  Ronald G. Prinn,et al.  Linking local air pollution to global chemistry and climate , 2000 .

[10]  James D. Annan,et al.  Understanding the CMIP3 Multimodel Ensemble , 2011 .

[11]  J. Whitaker,et al.  The Twentieth Century Reanalysis Project 3 , 2011 .

[12]  L. Perelman,et al.  Hydrostatic, quasi‐hydrostatic, and nonhydrostatic ocean modeling , 1997 .

[13]  Andrei P. Sokolov,et al.  A Methodology for Quantifying Uncertainty in Climate Projections , 2000 .

[14]  E. Fischer,et al.  A Review of the European Summer Heat Wave of 2003 , 2010 .

[15]  Andrei P. Sokolov,et al.  A Global Land System Framework for Integrated Climate-Change Assessments , 2007 .

[16]  J. Janowiak,et al.  The Version 2 Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) Monthly Precipitation Analysis (1979-Present) , 2003 .

[17]  J. Lamarque,et al.  A global simulation of tropospheric ozone and related tracers: Description and evaluation of MOZART, version 2 , 2001 .

[18]  F. A. Hayek The American Economic Review , 2007 .

[19]  David W. J. Thompson,et al.  Interpretation of Recent Southern Hemisphere Climate Change , 2002, Science.

[20]  M. Webb,et al.  Structural similarities and differences in climate responses to CO2 increase between two perturbed physics ensembles. , 2010 .

[21]  Alexei G. Sankovski,et al.  Special report on emissions scenarios : a special report of Working group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2000 .

[22]  K. Taylor,et al.  Forcing, feedbacks and climate sensitivity in CMIP5 coupled atmosphere‐ocean climate models , 2012 .

[23]  Chris E. Forest,et al.  Quantifying the Likelihood of Regional Climate Change: A Hybridized Approach , 2013 .

[24]  W. Collins,et al.  Description of the NCAR Community Atmosphere Model (CAM 3.0) , 2004 .

[25]  Sergey Paltsev,et al.  Probabilistic forecast for twenty-first-century climate based on uncertainties in emissions (without policy) and climate parameters. , 2009 .

[26]  John F. B. Mitchell,et al.  THE WCRP CMIP3 Multimodel Dataset: A New Era in Climate Change Research , 2007 .

[27]  C. Deser,et al.  Communication of the role of natural variability in future North American climate , 2012 .

[28]  Andrei P. Sokolov,et al.  Constraining climate model parameters from observed 20th century changes , 2008 .

[29]  P. Jones,et al.  Hemispheric and large-scale land-surface air temperature variations: An extensive revision and an update to 2010: LAND-SURFACE TEMPERATURE VARIATIONS , 2012 .

[30]  Charles Doutriaux,et al.  Performance metrics for climate models , 2008 .

[31]  Andrei P. Sokolov,et al.  A global interactive chemistry and climate model: Formulation and testing , 1998 .

[32]  Sergey Paltsev,et al.  Analysis of climate policy targets under uncertainty , 2012, Climatic Change.

[33]  M. Claussen,et al.  EMIC Intercomparison Project (EMIP–CO2): comparative analysis of EMIC simulations of climate, and of equilibrium and transient responses to atmospheric CO2 doubling , 2005 .

[34]  Jonathan M. Gregory,et al.  The Role of Climate Sensitivity and Ocean Heat Uptake on AOGCM Transient Temperature Response , 2002 .

[35]  Elizabeth C. Kent,et al.  Global analyses of sea surface temperature, sea ice, and night marine air temperature since the late nineteenth century , 2003 .

[36]  Mark New,et al.  Surface air temperature and its changes over the past 150 years , 1999 .

[37]  Andrei P. Sokolov,et al.  Comparing Oceanic Heat Uptake in AOGCM Transient Climate Change Experiments , 2003 .

[38]  Andrei P. Sokolov,et al.  A model intercomparison of changes in the Atlantic thermohaline circulation in response to increasing atmospheric CO2 concentration , 2005 .

[39]  Thomas M. Smith,et al.  Estimating Monthly Precipitation Reconstruction Uncertainty Beginning in 1900 , 2013 .

[40]  Thomas M. Smith,et al.  Improved Reconstruction of Global Precipitation since 1900 , 2012 .

[41]  F. Joos,et al.  Probabilistic climate change projections using neural networks , 2003 .

[42]  Andrei P. Sokolov,et al.  Probabilistic projections of 21st century climate change over Northern Eurasia , 2013 .

[43]  Andrei P. Sokolov,et al.  A flexible climate model for use in integrated assessments , 1998 .

[44]  P. Xie,et al.  Global Precipitation: A 17-Year Monthly Analysis Based on Gauge Observations, Satellite Estimates, and Numerical Model Outputs , 1997 .

[45]  F. Chapin,et al.  Methane bubbling from Siberian thaw lakes as a positive feedback to climate warming , 2006, Nature.

[46]  Erwan Monier,et al.  Climate change impacts on extreme events in the United States: an uncertainty analysis , 2014, Climatic Change.

[47]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  Technical Description of the Community Land Model (CLM) , 2004 .

[48]  Sergey Paltsev,et al.  MIT Integrated Global System Model (IGSM) Version 2: Model Description and Baseline Evaluation , 2005 .

[49]  Andrei P. Sokolov,et al.  Relative roles of climate sensitivity and forcing in defining the ocean circulation response to climate change , 2008 .

[50]  W. Collins,et al.  The Community Climate System Model Version 3 (CCSM3) , 2006 .

[51]  A. McGuire,et al.  Global climate change and terrestrial net primary production , 1993, Nature.

[52]  Andrei P. Sokolov,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Ocean-Seaice-Carbon Cycle Model and its Coupling to a Two-Dimensional Atmospheric Model: Uses in Climate Change Studies , 2005 .

[53]  James J. Hack,et al.  The Dynamical Simulation of the Community Atmosphere Model Version 3 (CAM3) , 2006 .

[54]  Seon Tae Kim,et al.  Identification of Central‐Pacific and Eastern‐Pacific types of ENSO in CMIP3 models , 2010 .

[55]  Kevin E. Trenberth,et al.  Distinctive climate signals in reanalysis of global ocean heat content , 2013 .

[56]  J. Robine,et al.  Death toll exceeded 70,000 in Europe during the summer of 2003. , 2008, Comptes rendus biologies.

[57]  James J. Hack,et al.  A New Sea Surface Temperature and Sea Ice Boundary Dataset for the Community Atmosphere Model , 2008 .

[58]  Sebastian Rausch,et al.  A Numerical Investigation of the Potential for Negative Emissions Leakage , 2013 .

[59]  Jeffery R. Scott,et al.  Valuing climate impacts in integrated assessment models: the MIT IGSM , 2013, Climatic Change.

[60]  Andrei P. Sokolov,et al.  Investigating the Causes of the Response of the Thermohaline Circulation to Past and Future Climate Changes , 2006 .

[61]  Andrei P. Sokolov,et al.  Climate Dynamics (2006) DOI 10.1007/s00382-005-0092-6 , 2005 .

[62]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[63]  Andrei P. Sokolov,et al.  Long-Term climate change commitment and reversibility: An EMIC intercomparison , 2013 .

[64]  P. Jones,et al.  Quantifying uncertainties in global and regional temperature change using an ensemble of observational estimates: The HadCRUT4 data set , 2012 .

[65]  Matthew D. Collins,et al.  Towards quantifying uncertainty in transient climate change , 2006 .

[66]  Stephanie Dutkiewicz,et al.  Modeling the coupling of ocean ecology and biogeochemistry , 2009 .

[67]  D. Randall,et al.  Climate models and their evaluation , 2007 .

[68]  John F. B. Mitchell,et al.  The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment , 2010, Nature.

[69]  Leonard A. Smith,et al.  Uncertainty in predictions of the climate response to rising levels of greenhouse gases , 2005, Nature.

[70]  J. Thepaut,et al.  The ERA‐Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system , 2011 .

[71]  M. Webb,et al.  Quantification of modelling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations , 2004, Nature.

[72]  A. Sokolov,et al.  Sensitivity of the Ocean’s Climate to Diapycnal Diffusivity in an EMIC. Part II: Global Warming Scenario , 2005 .

[73]  Andrei P. Sokolov,et al.  Does Model Sensitivity to Changes in CO2 Provide a Measure of Sensitivity to Other Forcings , 2006 .

[74]  Andrei P. Sokolov,et al.  Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change Constraining Climate Model Properties Using Optimal Fingerprint Detection Methods , 2000 .

[75]  Sergey Paltsev,et al.  The MIT Emissions Prediction and Policy Analysis (EPPA) Model: Version 4 , 2005 .

[76]  Andrei P. Sokolov,et al.  Historical and idealized climate model experiments: an intercomparison of Earth system models of intermediate complexity , 2013 .

[77]  Andrei P. Sokolov,et al.  A framework for modeling uncertainty in regional climate change , 2014, Climatic Change.

[78]  R. Dickinson,et al.  The Community Land Model and Its Climate Statistics as a Component of the Community Climate System Model , 2006 .

[79]  P. Jones,et al.  The Twentieth Century Reanalysis Project , 2009 .

[80]  Peter H. Stone,et al.  Efficient Three-Dimensional Global Models for Climate Studies: Models I and II , 1983 .

[81]  R. Prinn,et al.  Uncertainty and Climate Change Assessments , 2001, Science.

[82]  C. Deser,et al.  Uncertainty in climate change projections: the role of internal variability , 2012, Climate Dynamics.

[83]  J. Edmonds,et al.  Scenarios of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Atmospheric Concentrations , 2007 .

[84]  David M. Lawrence,et al.  A projection of severe near‐surface permafrost degradation during the 21st century , 2005 .

[85]  R. Reynolds,et al.  The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project , 1996, Renewable Energy.

[86]  Ina Ruck,et al.  USA , 1969, The Lancet.