Intercrystal Scatter Rejection for Pixelated PET Detectors

High-resolution positron emission tomography (PET) scanners often use pixelated scintillator arrays with lightsharing for the detection of gamma rays. The aim of this paper is to enhance the spatial resolution of such a pixelated scintillator detector by filtering out events with multiple interactions of gamma rays in the scintillator based on the measured light distributions. To develop and evaluate such enhancements in spatial resolution, we measure the point spread function (PSF) of our detector directly using a thinly collimated gamma ray beam setup, and then later verify their benefits on a full preclinical PET system with a hotrod phantom. The scintillator detector comprises a $30\times 30\times 12$ mm3 lutetium–yttrium oxyorthosilicate array with a pitch of 1 mm coupled to a digital silicon photomultiplier array via a 2-mm lightguide. We use a center of gravity algorithm for the crystal identification; however, the proposed filters are independent of the crystal identification algorithm. Investigating a single detector with our collimated gamma beam, we reject 15% of the events as multiple interaction while improving the crystal identification efficiency from 60.0% to 68.3% and the 90th-percentile diameter of the PSF from 7.88 to 3.98 mm. On system level, we analyze a line profile through two different rod sizes in a hotrod phantom. The filters reject 32% of the coincidences and increase the peak-to-valley ratio by 8% (0.9-mm rods) and by 18% (1.2-mm rods).

[1]  S. Cherry,et al.  A study of inter-crystal scatter in small scintillator arrays designed for high resolution PET imaging , 1995, 1995 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record.

[2]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Calculation of positron range and its effect on the fundamental limit of positron emission tomography system spatial resolution. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  M. Rafecas,et al.  Characterization and processing of inter-crystal scatter in a dual layer, high resolution LSO-APD-PET , 2001, 2001 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (Cat. No.01CH37310).

[4]  N. Clinthorne,et al.  Effect of intercrystal Compton scatter on efficiency and image noise in small animal PET module , 2003, 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515).

[5]  Joel S. Karp,et al.  Imaging performance of a-PET: a small animal PET camera , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  S. Cherry,et al.  Observations regarding scatter fraction and NEC measurements for small animal PET , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[7]  S. Cherry,et al.  Fabrication and characterization of a 0.5-mm lutetium oxyorthosilicate detector array for high-resolution PET applications. , 2007, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  R. Fontaine,et al.  Performance evaluation of the LabPET™ APD-based digital PET scanner , 2009, 2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[9]  Eiji Yoshida,et al.  Annihilation photon acollinearity in PET: volunteer and phantom FDG studies , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  Peter Bruyndonckx,et al.  Monolithic scintillator PET detectors with intrinsic depth-of-interaction correction , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Jogeshwar Mukherjee,et al.  Performance evaluation of an Inveon PET preclinical scanner , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  T. Frach,et al.  The digital silicon photomultiplier — Principle of operation and intrinsic detector performance , 2009, 2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[13]  T. Frach,et al.  The digital Silicon Photomultiplier — A novel sensor for the detection of scintillation light , 2009, 2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[14]  A. Rahmim,et al.  Quantitative investigation of inter-crystal scatter and penetration in the GE Discovery RX PET/CT scanner using Monte Carlo simulations , 2010, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposuim & Medical Imaging Conference.

[15]  René M. Botnar,et al.  A Self-Normalization Reconstruction Technique for PET Scans Using the Positron Emission Data , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  S. Vandenberghe,et al.  DigiPET: sub-millimeter spatial resolution small-animal PET imaging using thin monolithic scintillators , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  W. Chewpraditkul,et al.  Comparison of Photofraction for LuYAP:Ce, LYSO:Ce and BGO Crystals in Gamma Ray Detection , 2014 .

[18]  P Gebhardt,et al.  MR-compatibility assessment of the first preclinical PET-MRI insert equipped with digital silicon photomultipliers , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  René M. Botnar,et al.  A Digital Preclinical PET/MRI Insert and Initial Results , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[20]  V. Schulz,et al.  Data Processing for a High Resolution Preclinical PET Detector Based on Philips DPC Digital SiPMs , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[21]  Volkmar Schulz,et al.  PET performance and MRI compatibility evaluation of a digital, ToF-capable PET/MRI insert equipped with clinical scintillators , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  G. Borghi,et al.  A 32 mm  ×  32 mm  ×  22 mm monolithic LYSO:Ce detector with dual-sided digital photon counter readout for ultrahigh-performance TOF-PET and TOF-PET/MRI , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  Volkmar Schulz,et al.  Maximum likelihood positioning algorithm for high-resolution PET scanners. , 2016, Medical physics.

[24]  Volkmar Schulz,et al.  Software-Based Real-Time Acquisition and Processing of PET Detector Raw Data , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[25]  G. Borghi,et al.  Towards monolithic scintillator based TOF-PET systems: practical methods for detector calibration and operation , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[26]  Volkmar Schulz,et al.  Initial PET performance evaluation of a preclinical insert for PET/MRI with digital SiPM technology , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.