The emergence of boundary clusters in inter-organizational innovation

Firms that want to innovate often do so by conducting cooperative innovation activities with business partners. In such inter-organizational cooperations, business partners depend on each other's knowledge and bring in different types of expertise. In our research we focus on the knowledge exchanges across knowledge boundaries in inter-organizational activities for innovation. Information systems (IS) play an important role as enablers in this context. The concept of boundary objects has been used to describe interactions between actors with varying information and knowledge needs. While the vital role of boundary objects has been recognized in IS literature, the process of emergence of boundary-spanning has received less attention. Recent literature has hinted that, contrary to initial conceptualizations, boundary objects may not manifest as only single information technology artifacts. In this study, we offer the view of boundary objects as a cluster of several artifacts. By means of a qualitative case study, we describe the process of emergence of such boundary clusters and provide evidence for how they advance inter-organizational innovation activities. We describe how such clusters emerge from differences and dependencies in the knowledge of cooperating actors and explore the clusters' significance to knowledge exchanges in inter-organizational innovation contexts. In doing so, we offer an explanation of cluster emergence which links the interplay of artifacts, uses, practices, and knowledge to the coordination of cooperative inter-organizational innovation activities. We suggest boundary clusters as a new concept in boundary-spanning.Boundary clusters emerge within cooperative episodes in team cooperations.The clusters combine multiple artifacts to act as one boundary object.Boundary clusters advance inter-organizational innovation activities.Boundary clusters help analyze coordinative capabilities in team cooperations.

[1]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  Qualitative Research in Information Systems , 1997, MIS Q..

[2]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences , 1999 .

[3]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  Locating Adaptive Learning: The Situated Nature of Adaptive Learning in Organizations , 1997 .

[4]  Sylwia Męcfal.  Recenzja książki. Robert K. yin, Case Study Research. Design and Methods (fourth Edition), thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2009 , 2012 .

[5]  Jennifer Whyte,et al.  Beyond the computer: Changing medium from digital to physical , 2013, Inf. Organ..

[6]  Claus Bossen,et al.  Infrastructuring and Ordering Devices in Health Care: Medication Plans and Practices on a Hospital Ward , 2010, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[7]  Eric Blanco,et al.  Intermediary Objects as a Means to Foster Co-operation in Engineering Design , 2003, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[8]  A. Bryman,et al.  Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods , 2004 .

[9]  S. Carlsson.  Knowledge managing and knowledge management systems in inter-organizational networks , 2003 .

[10]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations , 1993 .

[11]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Turn to the material: Remote diagnostics systems and new forms of boundary-spanning , 2009, Inf. Organ..

[12]  Ramkrishnan V. Tenkasi,et al.  P ERSPECTIVE M AKING AND P ERSPECTIVE T AKING IN C OMMUNITIES OF K NOWING , 2000 .

[13]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  The qualitative interview in IS research: Examining the craft , 2007, Inf. Organ..

[14]  Ruey‐Lin Hsiao,et al.  Collaborative Knowing: The Adaptive Nature of Cross‐Boundary Spanning , 2012 .

[15]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[16]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  The dynamics of IT boundary objects, information infrastructures, and organisational identities: the introduction of 3D modelling technologies into the architecture, engineering, and construction industry , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Emmanuelle Vaast,et al.  Turning a Community into a Market: A Practice Perspective on Information Technology Use in Boundary Spanning , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Jean-François Boujut.  User-defined annotations: artefacts for co-ordination and shared understanding in design teams , 2003 .

[19]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[20]  T. Pinch,et al.  The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other , 1984 .

[21]  Chris Kimble,et al.  Innovation and knowledge sharing across professional boundaries: Political interplay between boundary objects and brokers , 2010, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[22]  Martin Bichler,et al.  Design science in information systems research , 2006, Wirtschaftsinf..

[23]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[24]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing , 2002, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[25]  Bill Doolin,et al.  Sociomateriality and boundary objects in information systems development , 2012, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[26]  Yoji Akao,et al.  Quality Function Deployment : Integrating Customer Requirements into Product Design , 1990 .

[27]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[28]  Afie M. Badawy.  Strategic Management in the Innovation Economy: Strategy Approaches and Tools for Dynamic Innovation Capabilities, T.H. Davenport, M. Leibold, S.C. Voelpel. Publicis KommunikationsAgentur GmbH, GWA, Erlangen, Germany in conjunction with Wiley in the United States (2007). 441 pp. , 2008 .

[29]  Bill Doolin,et al.  Information systems development as situated socio-technical change: a process approach , 2012, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[30]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[31]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[32]  Emmanuelle Vaast,et al.  Turning a Community into a Market: A Practice Perspective on IT Use in Boundary-Spanning , 2005 .

[33]  Kjeld Schmidt,et al.  Ordering Systems: Coordinative Practices and Artifacts in Architectural Design and Planning , 2004, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[34]  Victor P. Seidel,et al.  Managing the Repertoire: Stories, Metaphors, Prototypes, and Concept Coherence in Product Innovation , 2014, Organ. Sci..

[35]  T. P. Hughes,et al.  The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology , 1989 .

[36]  R. Stake.  Qualitative Case Studies. , 2005 .

[37]  Liisa von Hellens,et al.  Qualitative Research in Information Systems , 2007, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[38]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[39]  Eric Monteiro,et al.  From Artefacts to Infrastructures , 2013, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[40]  Tom Butler,et al.  Understanding the design of information technologies for knowledge management in organizations: a pragmatic perspective , 2007, Inf. Syst. J..

[41]  N. Denzin,et al.  The Sage handbook of qualitative research, 3rd ed. , 2005 .

[42]  Deana D. Pennington,et al.  The Dynamics of Material Artifacts in Collaborative Research Teams , 2010, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[43]  Ole Hanseth,et al.  Reflexive Standardization: Side Effects and Complexity in Standard Making , 2006, MIS Q..

[44]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Technology Adaptation: The Case of a Computer-Supported Inter-Organizational Virtual Team , 2000, MIS Q..

[45]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  Transcending Knowledge Differences in Cross-Functional Teams , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[46]  Ramkrishnan V. Tenkasi,et al.  Designing Information Technology to Support Distributed Cognition Ceo Publication G 93-16 (236) Designing Information Technology to Support Distributed Cognition Designing Information Technology to Support Distributed Cognition , 1994 .

[47]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  Radical Innovation Without Collocation: A Case Study at Boeing-Rocketdyne , 2001, MIS Q..

[48]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Expertise Integration and Creativity in Information Systems Development , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[49]  Valéry Merminod,et al.  How does PLM technology support knowledge transfer and translation in new product development? Transparency and boundary spanners in an international context , 2012, Inf. Organ..

[50]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[51]  Satish Nambisan,et al.  Information Systems as a Reference Discipline for New Product Development , 2003, MIS Q..

[52]  Nilesh Saraf,et al.  IS Application Capabilities and Relational Value in Interfirm Partnerships , 2007, Inf. Syst. Res..

[53]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Boundary Objects in Design: An Ecological View of Design Artifacts , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[54]  N. Levina.  Understanding Boundary-Spanning in Knowledge Work : Implications for IT Use * by , 2004 .

[55]  Eivor Oborn,et al.  Boundary object use in cross-cultural software development teams , 2010 .

[56]  Abbie Griffin,et al.  The Voice of the Customer , 1993 .

[57]  Martha S. Feldman,et al.  Designing routines: On the folly of designing artifacts, while hoping for patterns of action , 2008, Inf. Organ..

[58]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizing Knowledge , 1998 .

[59]  J. Gosby.  MEDIA REVIEWS: Basics of Qualitative Research - Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory 2nd Edition by A. Strauss and J. Corbin. Sage Publications, , 2000 .

[60]  C. Hardy,et al.  Resources, Knowledge and Influence: The Organizational Effects of Interorganizational Collaboration* , 2003 .

[61]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[62]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Product Development Decisions: A Review of the Literature , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[63]  W. Orlikowski.  The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations , 2014 .

[64]  Beth A. Bechky.  Sharing Meaning Across Occupational Communities: The Transformation of Understanding on a Production Floor , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[65]  Suzanne D. Pawlowski,et al.  Bridging User Organizations: Knowledge Brokering and the Work of Information Technology Professionals , 2004, MIS Q..

[66]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[67]  Charlotte P. Lee,et al.  Boundary Negotiating Artifacts: Unbinding the Routine of Boundary Objects and Embracing Chaos in Collaborative Work , 2007, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[68]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Technology adaption: the case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team 1 , 2000 .

[69]  Carla Simone,et al.  Coordination mechanisms: Towards a conceptual foundation of CSCW systems design , 1996, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[70]  Emmanuelle Vaast,et al.  The Emergence of Boundary Spanning Competence in Practice: Implications for Implementation and Use of Information Systems , 2005, MIS Q..

[71]  E. Wenger.  Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems , 2000 .

[72]  Kaj U. Koskinen.  Metaphoric boundary objects as co‐ordinating mechanisms in the knowledge sharing of innovation processes , 2005 .

[73]  Leigh Jin,et al.  Intertwining material and virtual work , 2003, Inf. Organ..

[74]  A. Bryman,et al.  The Sage Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods (three volumes) , 2003 .

[75]  Saturnino Luz,et al.  Collaboration in Translation: The Impact of Increased Reach on Cross-organisational Work , 2012, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[76]  MajchrzakAnn,et al.  Radical innovation without collocation , 2001 .

[77]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[78]  S. L. Star,et al.  This is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept , 2010 .

[79]  Marius Leibold,et al.  Strategic Management in the Innovation Economy: Strategic Approaches and Tools for Dynamic Innovation Capabilities , 2006 .

[80]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  Into the black box: the knowledge transformation cycle , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[81]  Jonathan A. Smith.  Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods , 2006, QMiP Bulletin.

[82]  Natalia Levina,et al.  Collaborating on Multi-Party Information Systems Development Projects: A Collective Reflection-in-Action View , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[83]  Ina Wagner.  Building Urban Narratives: Collaborative Site-Seeing and Envisioning in the MR Tent , 2011, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[84]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  Into the black box: the knowledge transformation cycle , 2003 .