Evaluation and Real-Time Monitoring of Data Quality in Electrical Impedance Tomography

Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is a noninvasive method to image conductivity distributions within a body. One promising application of EIT is to monitor ventilation in patients as a real-time bedside tool. Thus, it is essential that an EIT system reliably provide meaningful information, or alert clinicians when this is impossible. Because the reconstructed images are very sensitive to system instabilities (primarily from electrode connection variability and movement), EIT systems should continuously monitor and, if possible, correct for such errors. Motivated by this requirement, we describe a novel approach to quantitatively measure EIT data quality. Our goals are to define the requirements of a data quality metric, develop a metric q which meets these requirements, and an efficient way to calculate it. The developed metric q was validated using data from saline tank experiments and a retrospective clinical study. Additionally, we show that q may be used to compare the performance of EIT systems using phantom measurements. Results suggest that the calculated metric reflects well the quality of reconstructed EIT images for both phantom and clinical data. The proposed measure can thus be used for real-time assessment of EIT data quality and, hence, to indicate the reliability of any derived physiological information.

[1]  Andy Adler,et al.  Impact of Model Shape Mismatch on Reconstruction Quality in Electrical Impedance Tomography , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  Andy Adler,et al.  Automatic detection of detached and erroneous electrodes in electrical impedance tomography , 2005, Physiological measurement.

[3]  Y. Asfaw,et al.  Detection of unreliable measurements in multi-sensor devices , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Workshop on Medical Measurements and Applications.

[4]  Andy Adler,et al.  Direct EIT Jacobian calculations for conductivity change and electrode movement , 2008, Physiological measurement.

[5]  B H Blott,et al.  EIT data noise evaluation in the clinical environment. , 1996, Physiological measurement.

[6]  Richard Youmaran,et al.  Towards a measure of biometric feature information , 2009, Pattern Analysis and Applications.

[7]  William R B Lionheart,et al.  Uses and abuses of EIDORS: an extensible software base for EIT , 2006, Physiological measurement.

[8]  Andy Adler,et al.  Adjacent stimulation and measurement patterns considered harmful , 2011, Physiological measurement.

[9]  B. Efron The jackknife, the bootstrap, and other resampling plans , 1987 .

[10]  Andy Adler,et al.  Evaluation of EIT system performance , 2011, Physiological measurement.

[11]  William R B Lionheart,et al.  GREIT: a unified approach to 2D linear EIT reconstruction of lung images , 2009, Physiological measurement.

[12]  Andy Adler,et al.  Whither lung EIT: Where are we, where do we want to go and what do we need to get there? , 2012, Physiological measurement.

[13]  Camille Gomez-Laberge,et al.  A Unified Approach for EIT Imaging of Regional Overdistension and Atelectasis in Acute Lung Injury , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[14]  S. Leonhardt,et al.  Lung volume calculated from electrical impedance tomography in ICU patients at different PEEP levels , 2009, Intensive Care Medicine.

[15]  F al-Hatib,et al.  Patient-instrument connection errors in bioelectrical impedance measurement , 1998, Physiological measurement.

[16]  Eugene Demidenko,et al.  An analytic solution to the homogeneous EIT problem on the 2D disk and its application to estimation of electrode contact impedances , 2011, Physiological measurement.

[17]  Andy Adler,et al.  Real-Time Management of Faulty Electrodes in Electrical Impedance Tomography , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  A Adler,et al.  Objective selection of hyperparameter for EIT , 2006, Physiological measurement.

[19]  Andy Adler,et al.  Accounting for erroneous electrode data in electrical impedance tomography. , 2004, Physiological measurement.

[20]  Yuqing Wan,et al.  Statistical Estimation of EIT Electrode Contact Impedance Using a Magic Toeplitz Matrix , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  Gregory Boverman,et al.  Methods for Compensating for Variable Electrode Contact in EIT , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  Andy Adler,et al.  Electrical impedance tomography: regularized imaging and contrast detection , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[23]  Andrzej Cichocki,et al.  Improving the Quality of EEG Data in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease Using ICA , 2009, ICONIP.

[24]  D Anton,et al.  Performance assessment of EIT measurement systems , 2010 .

[25]  D. Tucker,et al.  Scalp electrode impedance, infection risk, and EEG data quality , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.