With long intervals, inter-stimulus interval is the critical determinant of the human P300 amplitude
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] T W Picton,et al. Temporal and sequential probability in evoked potential studies. , 1981, Canadian journal of psychology.
[2] J. Polich,et al. P300 from a single auditory stimulus. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.
[3] John Polich,et al. P300 Sequence Effects, Probability, and Interstimulus Interval , 1997, Physiology & Behavior.
[4] C. Gonsalvez,et al. Target-to-target interval versus probability effects on P300 in one- and two-tone tasks. , 2003, Psychophysiology.
[5] J. Polich,et al. P300, probability, and the three-tone paradigm. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.
[6] R. Quian Quiroga,et al. Single-trial event-related potentials with wavelet denoising , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.
[7] P300 sequence effects differ between children and adults for auditory stimuli. , 1999, Psychophysiology.
[8] J. Polich,et al. P300, probability, and interstimulus interval. , 1990, Psychophysiology.
[9] N. Squires,et al. The effect of stimulus sequence on the waveform of the cortical event-related potential. , 1976, Science.
[10] J. Polich,et al. P300 and probability: comparison of oddball and single-stimulus paradigms. , 1997, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.
[11] E Gordon,et al. Is the target-to-target interval a critical determinant of P3 amplitude? , 1999, Psychophysiology.
[12] J. Polich,et al. P300 amplitude is determined by target-to-target interval. , 2002, Psychophysiology.
[13] Barry Fowler,et al. Effects of a dual task on the N100-P200 complex and the early and late Nd attention waveforms. , 2002, Psychophysiology.