Control your Facebook: An analysis of online privacy literacy

For an effective and responsible communication on social network sites (SNSs) users must decide between withholding and disclosing personal information. For this so-called privacy regulation, users need to have the respective skills-in other words, they need to have online privacy literacy. In this study, we discuss factors that potentially contribute to and result from online privacy literacy. In an online questionnaire with 630 Facebook users, we found that people who spend more time on Facebook and who have changed their privacy settings more frequently reported to have more online privacy literacy. People with more online privacy literacy, in turn, felt more secure on Facebook and implemented more social privacy settings. A mediation analysis showed that time spend on Facebook and experience with privacy regulation did not per se increase safety and privacy behavior directly, stressing the importance of online privacy literacy as a mediator to a safe and privacy-enhancing online behavior. We conclude that Internet experience leads to more online privacy literacy, which fosters a more cautious privacy behavior on SNSs. The more people use SNSs, the more privacy literacy they have.The more people change their privacy settings on SNSs, the more privacy literacy they have.People with more privacy literacy restrict access to their SNS profile more strongly.People with more privacy literacy feel safer when using SNSs.

[1]  Alessandro Acquisti,et al.  Imagined Communities: Awareness, Information Sharing, and Privacy on the Facebook , 2006, Privacy Enhancing Technologies.

[2]  T Raykov,et al.  Estimation of congeneric scale reliability using covariance structure analysis with nonlinear constraints. , 2001, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[3]  Bernhard Debatin,et al.  Facebook and Online Privacy: Attitudes, Behaviors, and Unintended Consequences , 2009, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[4]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .

[5]  James L. Arbuckle,et al.  Full Information Estimation in the Presence of Incomplete Data , 1996 .

[6]  Yves Rosseel,et al.  lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling , 2012 .

[7]  Joseph Gray Jackson,et al.  Privacy and Freedom , 1968 .

[8]  Judee K. Burgoon,et al.  Privacy and Communication , 1982 .

[9]  A. Maslow,et al.  Principles of Abnormal Psychology , 1951 .

[10]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .

[11]  Stephanie M. Reich,et al.  Online and Offline Social Networks: Use of Social Networking Sites by Emerging Adults , 2008 .

[12]  Xigen Li,et al.  Third-Person Effect, Optimistic Bias, and Sufficiency Resource in Internet Use , 2008 .

[13]  Leslie Haddon,et al.  EU kids online II: final report 2011 , 2011 .

[14]  Yong Jin Park,et al.  Digital Literacy and Privacy Behavior Online , 2013, Commun. Res..

[15]  Lucie Laflamme,et al.  Safety and safety promotion: definitions for operational developments , 2001 .

[16]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[17]  S. Petronio Boundaries of Privacy: Dialectics of Disclosure , 2002 .

[18]  Monika Taddicken Selbstoffenbarung im Social Web , 2011 .

[19]  Bernhard Debatin,et al.  Ethics, Privacy, and Self-Restraint in Social Networking , 2011, Privacy Online.

[20]  Cameron Marlow,et al.  Feed me: motivating newcomer contribution in social network sites , 2009, CHI.

[21]  Eden Litt,et al.  Understanding social network site users' privacy tool use , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[22]  Benjamin K. Johnson,et al.  Just being themselves?: goals and strategies for self-presentation on Facebook , 2010 .

[23]  D. J. Dwyer,et al.  The effects of job demands and control on employee attendance and satisfaction , 1991 .

[24]  Young Min Baek,et al.  Solving the privacy paradox: A counter-argument experimental approach , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[25]  Kan Min Lin Understanding Undergraduates' Information Literacy from their Facebook Usage , 2015, 2015 IEEE 15th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.

[26]  J. Turow,et al.  How Different are Young Adults from Older Adults When it Comes to Information Privacy Attitudes and Policies? , 2010 .

[27]  Sabine Trepte,et al.  Is the privacy paradox a relic of the past? An in‐depth analysis of privacy attitudes and privacy behaviors , 2015 .

[28]  Sonia Livingstone,et al.  Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: teenagers' use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression , 2008, New Media Soc..

[29]  Tamara Dinev,et al.  Internet Privacy Concerns and Social Awareness as Determinants of Intention to Transact , 2005, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[30]  S. Mo Jang,et al.  Understanding privacy knowledge and skill in mobile communication , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[31]  Alfred Kobsa,et al.  Privacy in instant messaging: an impression management model , 2012, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[32]  D. Boyd Taken Out of Context: American Teen Sociality in Networked Publics , 2010 .

[33]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  A bumpy ride on the information superhighway: Exploring turbulence online , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[34]  Monika Taddicken,et al.  The 'Privacy Paradox' in the Social Web: The Impact of Privacy Concerns, Individual Characteristics, and the Perceived Social Relevance on Different Forms of Self-Disclosure1 , 2014, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[35]  John Leubsdorf,et al.  Privacy and Freedom , 1968 .

[36]  Leonard Reinecke,et al.  The Social Web as a Shelter for Privacy and Authentic Living , 2011, Privacy Online.

[37]  Leonard Reinecke,et al.  The reciprocal effects of social network site use and the disposition for self-disclosure: A longitudinal study , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[38]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  Online Self-Presentation: Balancing Privacy Concerns and Impression Construction on Social Networking Sites , 2011, Privacy Online.

[39]  Philipp K. Masur,et al.  Do People Know About Privacy and Data Protection Strategies? Towards the “Online Privacy Literacy Scale” (OPLIS) , 2015 .

[40]  Spss,et al.  Discovering Statistics (4th Edition ed. , 2013 .

[41]  Susan B. Barnes,et al.  A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States , 2006, First Monday.

[42]  James Y. L. Thong,et al.  Internet Privacy Concerns: An Integrated Conceptualization and Four Empirical Studies , 2013, MIS Q..

[43]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[44]  S. Livingstone,et al.  Internet literacy among children and young people: findings from the UK Children Go Online project , 2005 .

[45]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[46]  Anabel Quan-Haase,et al.  PRIVACY PROTECTION STRATEGIES ON FACEBOOK , 2013 .

[47]  Serge Gutwirth,et al.  Reforming European Data Protection Law , 2014 .

[48]  Nicholas Christakis,et al.  The Taste for Privacy: An Analysis of College Student Privacy Settings in an Online Social Network , 2008, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[49]  Steve Love,et al.  Security awareness of computer users: A phishing threat avoidance perspective , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[50]  Rick H. Hoyle,et al.  Three Approaches to Using Lengthy Ordinal Scales in Structural Equation Models , 2010, Applied psychological measurement.

[51]  Monika Taddicken,et al.  The Uses of Privacy Online: Trading a Loss of Privacy for Social Web Gratifications? , 2011, Privacy Online.

[52]  S. Desmarais,et al.  Hey Mom, What’s on Your Facebook? Comparing Facebook Disclosure and Privacy in Adolescents and Adults , 2012 .

[53]  Jeremy Miles,et al.  Discovering statistics using R, 1st Edition , 2012 .

[54]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Facebook privacy settings: Who cares? , 2010, First Monday.