Interreader reliability for a new classification of lumbar disk disease.

[1]  M. Jensen,et al.  Imaging Corner: Spinal Nomenclature , 1995 .

[2]  D B Kopans,et al.  The accuracy of mammographic interpretation. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  J. Elmore,et al.  Variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  N. Obuchowski,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in people without back pain. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  R. Nasca,et al.  Terms Used For Diagnosis by English Speaking Spine Surgeons , 1993, Spine.

[6]  L. Cyr,et al.  Measures of clinical agreement for nominal and categorical data: the kappa coefficient. , 1992, Computers in biology and medicine.

[7]  R. Deyo,et al.  Descriptive Epidemiology of Low‐back Pain and Its Related Medical Care in the United States , 1987, Spine.

[8]  Annette J. Dobson,et al.  General observer-agreement measures on individual subjects and groups of subjects , 1984 .

[9]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[10]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  The Equivalence of Weighted Kappa and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient as Measures of Reliability , 1973 .

[11]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. , 1968 .

[12]  D. H. Howard.  Variability of radiologists' mammographic interpretations and recommendations for management , 1994 .

[13]  J. Robertson,et al.  The rape of the spine. , 1993, Surgical neurology.