How artificial life relates to theoretical biology

There is a long tradition of software simulations in theoretical biology to complement pure analytical mathematics which are often limited to reproduce and understand the self-organisation phenomena resulting from the non-linear and spatially grounded interactions of the huge number of diverse biological objects. Since John Von Neumann and Alan Turing pioneering works on self-replication and morphogenesis, proponents of artificial life have chosen to resolutely neglecting a lot of materialistic and quantitative information deemed not indispensable and have focused on the rule-based mechanisms making life possible, supposedly neutral with respect to their underlying material embodiment. Minimal life begins at the intersection of a series of processes which need to be isolated, differentiated and duplicated as such in computers. Only software developments and running make possible to understand the way these processes are intimately interconnected in order for life to appear at the crossroad. In this paper, I will attempt to set out the history of life as the disciples of artificial life understand it, by placing these different lessons on a temporal and causal axis, showing which one is indispensable to the appearance of the next and how does it connect to the next. These successive stages are the: 1) the appearance of chemical reaction cycles and autocatalytic networks 2) the production by this network of a membrane promoting individuation and catalyzing constitutive reactions 3) the self-replication of this elementary cell 4) the genetic coding and open-evolution by mutation, recombination and selection. I will discuss the task of artificial life as setting up experimental software platforms where these different lessons, whether taken in isolation or together, are tested, simulated, and, more systematically, analysed. I will sketch some of these existing software platforms: chemical reaction networks, Varela's autopoietic cellular automata, Ganti's chemoton model, genetic algorithms, whose running delivers interesting take home messages to open-minded biologists.

[1]  Christian de Duve,et al.  Life Evolving: Molecules, Mind, and Meaning , 2002 .

[2]  H. Maturana,et al.  Autopoiesis: the organization of living systems, its characterization and a model. , 1974, Currents in modern biology.

[3]  Hans Meinhardt,et al.  The Algorithmic Beauty of Sea Shells , 1998, The Virtual Laboratory.

[4]  John Maynard Smith,et al.  The Origins of Life: From the Birth of Life to the Origin of Language , 1999 .

[5]  Martin H. Levinson Linked: The New Science of Networks , 2004 .

[6]  C. Langton Self-reproduction in cellular automata , 1984 .

[7]  F. Dyson Origins of Life , 1985 .

[8]  T. Nagel Mortal Questions: What is it like to be a bat? , 2012 .

[9]  Hugues Bersini,et al.  Emergence of homochirality in far-from-equilibrium systems: mechanisms and role in prebiotic chemistry. , 2007, Chirality.

[10]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  The origins of order , 1993 .

[11]  R. Dawkins The Blind Watchmaker , 1986 .

[12]  A. M. Turing,et al.  The chemical basis of morphogenesis , 1952, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences.

[13]  Barry McMullin,et al.  Rediscovering Computational Autopoiesis , 1997 .

[14]  H. Heller,et al.  Principles of Life , 2010 .

[15]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[16]  S. Kauffman At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity , 1995 .

[17]  Rodney A. Brooks,et al.  Elephants don't play chess , 1990, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[18]  Tom Lenaerts,et al.  A Synthon Approach to Artificial Chemistry , 2009, Artificial Life.

[19]  Robert Shapiro,et al.  A simpler origin for life. , 2007, Scientific American.

[20]  Phil Husbands,et al.  Whatever Emerges should be Intrinsically Useful , 2004 .