US Wingspan Registry: 12-Month Follow-Up Results

Background and Purpose— The purpose of this study is to present 12-month follow-up results for a series of patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting with the Gateway-Wingspan stenting system (Boston Scientific) for the treatment of symptomatic intracranial atherostenosis. Methods— Clinical and angiographic follow-up results were recorded for patients from 5 participating institutions. Primary end points were stroke or death within 30 days of the stenting procedure or ipsilateral stroke after 30 days. Results— During a 21-month study period, 158 patients with 168 intracranial atherostenotic lesions (50% to 99%) were treated with the Gateway-Wingspan system. The average follow-up duration was 14.2 months with 143 patients having at least 3 months of clinical follow-up and 110 having at least 12 months. The cumulative rate of the primary end point was 15.7% for all patients and 13.9% for patients with high-grade (70% to 99%) stenosis. Of 13 ipsilateral strokes occurring after 30 days, 3 resulted in death. Of these strokes, 76.9% (10 of 13) occurred within the first 6 months of the stenting procedure and no events were recorded after 12 months. An additional 9 patients experienced ipsilateral transient ischemic attack after 30 days. Most postprocedural events (86%) could be attributed to interruption of antiplatelet medications (n=6), in-stent restenosis (n=12), or both (n=1). In 3 patients, the events were of uncertain etiology. Conclusions— After successful Wingspan percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting, some patients continued to experience ipsilateral ischemic events. Most of these ischemic events occurred within 6 months of the procedure and were associated with the interruption of antiplatelet therapy or in-stent restenosis.

[1]  G. Sangiorgi,et al.  Optimization of drug‐eluting balloon use for safety and efficacy: Evaluation of the 2nd generation paclitaxel‐eluting DIOR‐balloon in porcine coronary arteries , 2010, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[2]  T. Turan,et al.  Treatment of atherosclerotic intracranial arterial stenosis. , 2009, Stroke.

[3]  Cleveland Clinic Foundation,et al.  Target Lesion Revascularization After Wingspan: Assessment of Safety and Durability , 2009, Stroke.

[4]  L. Wong,et al.  THE NIH REGISTRY ON USE OF THE WINGSPAN STENT FOR SYMPTOMATIC 70–99% INTRACRANIAL ARTERIAL STENOSIS , 2008, Neurology.

[5]  H. Woo,et al.  Angiographic patterns of Wingspan in-stent restenosis. , 2008, Neurosurgery.

[6]  M. Gyöngyösi,et al.  Attainment of local drug delivery with paclitaxel-eluting balloon in porcine coronary arteries , 2008, Coronary artery disease.

[7]  H. Woo,et al.  WINGSPAN IN‐STENT RESTENOSIS AND THROMBOSIS: INCIDENCE, CLINICAL PRESENTATION, AND MANAGEMENT , 2007, Neurosurgery.

[8]  H. Woo,et al.  Emerging Endovascular Therapies for Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease , 2007, Stroke.

[9]  M. Hartmann,et al.  A Novel, Self-Expanding, Nitinol Stent in Medically Refractory Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenoses: The Wingspan Study , 2007, Stroke.

[10]  H. Woo,et al.  US Multicenter Experience With the Wingspan Stent System for the Treatment of Intracranial Atheromatous Disease: Periprocedural Results , 2007, Stroke.

[11]  S. Kasner,et al.  Warfarin vs aspirin for symptomatic intracranial stenosis: Subgroup analyses from WASID , 2006, Neurology.

[12]  H. Woo,et al.  Neuroform in-stent stenosis: incidence, natural history, and treatment strategies. , 2006, Neurosurgery.

[13]  S. Kasner,et al.  Predictors of Ischemic Stroke in the Territory of a Symptomatic Intracranial Arterial Stenosis , 2006, Circulation.

[14]  S. Kasner,et al.  Comparison of warfarin and aspirin for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  H Yokoi,et al.  Three-year follow-up after implantation of metallic coronary-artery stents. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.