Tradeoffs between battery energy capacity and stochastic optimal power management in plug-in hybrid electric vehicles

Recent results in plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) power management research suggest that battery energy capacity requirements may be reduced through proper power management algorithm design. Specifically, algorithms which blend fuel and electricity during the charge depletion phase using smaller batteries may perform equally to algorithms that apply electric-only operation during charge depletion using larger batteries. The implication of this result is that “blended” power management algorithms may reduce battery energy capacity requirements, thereby lowering the acquisition costs of PHEVs. This article seeks to quantify the tradeoffs between power management algorithm design and battery energy capacity, in a systematic and rigorous manner. Namely, we (1) construct dynamic PHEV models with scalable battery energy capacities, (2) optimize power management using stochastic control theory, and (3) develop simulation methods to statistically quantify the performance tradeoffs. The degree to which blending enables smaller battery energy capacities is evaluated as a function of both daily driving distance and energy (fuel and electricity) pricing.

[1]  Valerie H. Johnson,et al.  Battery performance models in ADVISOR , 2002 .

[3]  Bo Egardt,et al.  Assessing the potential of predictive control for hybrid vehicle powertrains using stochastic dynamic programming , 2005 .

[4]  T. W. Anderson,et al.  Statistical Inference about Markov Chains , 1957 .

[5]  Tony Markel,et al.  Dynamic Programming Applied to Investigate Energy Management Strategies for a Plug-in HEV , 2006 .

[6]  David Wenzhong Gao,et al.  Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle Control Strategy Parameter Optimization , 2008 .

[7]  Makoto Yamazaki,et al.  Development of New-Generation Hybrid System THS II - Drastic Improvement of Power Performance and Fuel Economy , 2004 .

[8]  T. Markel,et al.  Energy storage systems considerations for grid-charged hybrid electric vehicles , 2005, 2005 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference.

[9]  Zoran Filipi,et al.  Impact of Naturalistic Driving Patterns on PHEV Performance and System Design , 2009 .

[10]  Richard A. Davis,et al.  Time Series: Theory and Methods , 2013 .

[11]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  Impact of Battery Weight and Charging Patterns on the Economic and Environmental Benefits of Plug-in Hybrid Vehicles , 2009 .

[12]  Andrew F. Burke,et al.  Batteries and Ultracapacitors for Electric, Hybrid, and Fuel Cell Vehicles , 2007, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[13]  M. Verbrugge,et al.  Adaptive state of charge algorithm for nickel metal hydride batteries including hysteresis phenomena , 2004 .

[14]  John A. Gubner Probability and Random Processes for Electrical and Computer Engineers , 2006 .

[15]  Gregory L. Plett,et al.  Extended Kalman filtering for battery management systems of LiPB-based HEV battery packs Part 1. Background , 2004 .

[16]  Chan-Chiao Lin,et al.  Modeling and control strategy development for hybrid vehicles. , 2004 .

[17]  Daniel M. Kammen,et al.  An innovation and policy agenda for commercially competitive plug-in hybrid electric vehicles , 2008 .

[18]  Hosam K. Fathy,et al.  A Stochastic Optimal Control Approach for Power Management in Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles , 2008 .

[19]  Paul A. Nelson,et al.  Midsize and SUV Vehicle Simulation Results for Plug-In HEV Component Requirements , 2007 .

[20]  Ilya Kolmanovsky,et al.  Optimization of powertrain operating policy for feasibility assessment and calibration: stochastic dynamic programming approach , 2002, Proceedings of the 2002 American Control Conference (IEEE Cat. No.CH37301).

[21]  Aymeric Rousseau,et al.  Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle Control Strategy: Comparison between EV and Charge-Depleting Options , 2008 .

[22]  Huei Peng,et al.  Modeling and Control of a Power-Split Hybrid Vehicle , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[23]  Anna G. Stefanopoulou,et al.  Current Management in a Hybrid Fuel Cell Power System: A Model-Predictive Control Approach , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[24]  K. B. Wipke,et al.  ADVISOR 2.1: a user-friendly advanced powertrain simulation using a combined backward/forward approach , 1999 .