Intercomparison of Planetary Boundary-Layer Parametrizations in the WRF Model for a Single Day from CASES-99

This study compares five planetary boundary-layer (PBL) parametrizations in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) numerical model for a single day from the Cooperative Atmosphere-Surface Exchange Study (CASES-99) field program. The five schemes include two first-order closure schemes—the Yonsei University (YSU) PBL and Asymmetric Convective Model version 2 (ACM2), and three turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) closure schemes—the Mellor–Yamada–Janjić (MYJ), quasi-normal scale elimination (QNSE), and Bougeault–Lacarrére (BouLac) PBL. The comparison results reveal that discrepancies among thermodynamic surface variables from different schemes are large at daytime, while the variables converge at nighttime with large deviations from those observed. On the other hand, wind components are more divergent at nighttime with significant biases. Regarding PBL structures, a non-local scheme with the entrainment flux proportional to the surface flux is favourable in unstable conditions. In stable conditions, the local TKE closure schemes show better performance. The sensitivity of simulated variables to surface-layer parametrizations is also investigated to assess relative contributions of the surface-layer parametrizations to typical features of each PBL scheme. In the surface layer, temperature and moisture are more strongly influenced by surface-layer formulations than by PBL mixing algorithms in both convective and stable regimes, while wind speed depends on vertical diffusion formulations in the convective regime. Regarding PBL structures, surface-layer formulations only contribute to near-surface variability and then PBL mean properties, whereas shapes of the profiles are determined by PBL mixing algorithms.

[1]  B. Galperin,et al.  ‘Application of a New Spectral Theory of Stably Stratified Turbulence to the Atmospheric Boundary Layer over Sea Ice’ , 2005 .

[2]  R. Stull.  An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology , 1988 .

[3]  Song‐You Hong,et al.  Improvement of the K-profile Model for the Planetary Boundary Layer based on Large Eddy Simulation Data , 2003 .

[4]  Song‐You Hong,et al.  Interaction between the orography‐induced gravity wave drag and boundary layer processes in a global atmospheric model , 2009 .

[5]  J. Pleim.  A Simple, Efficient Solution of Flux–Profile Relationships in the Atmospheric Surface Layer , 2006 .

[6]  A. Holtslag,et al.  Single-Column Model Intercomparison for a Stably Stratified Atmospheric Boundary Layer , 2004 .

[7]  P. Lacarrére,et al.  Parameterization of Orography-Induced Turbulence in a Mesobeta--Scale Model , 1989 .

[8]  G. Powers,et al.  A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 3 , 2008 .

[9]  Da‐Lin Zhang,et al.  A High-Resolution Model of the Planetary Boundary Layer—Sensitivity Tests and Comparisons with SESAME-79 Data , 1982 .

[10]  Zavisa Janjic,et al.  The Step-Mountain Coordinate: Physical Package , 1990 .

[11]  Song-You Hong,et al.  A new stable boundary‐layer mixing scheme and its impact on the simulated East Asian summer monsoon , 2010 .

[12]  Max J. Suarez,et al.  A Solar Radiation Parameterization for Atmospheric Studies , 2013 .

[13]  J. Lundquist,et al.  Nocturnal Low-Level Jet Characteristics Over Kansas During Cases-99 , 2002 .

[14]  Albert A. M. Holtslag,et al.  Local Versus Nonlocal Boundary-Layer Diffusion in a Global Climate Model , 1993 .

[15]  J. Pleim.  A Combined Local and Nonlocal Closure Model for the Atmospheric Boundary Layer. Part II: Application and Evaluation in a Mesoscale Meteorological Model , 2007 .

[16]  J. Dudhia,et al.  Coupling an Advanced Land Surface–Hydrology Model with the Penn State–NCAR MM5 Modeling System. Part II: Preliminary Model Validation , 2001 .

[17]  A. Holtslag,et al.  Evaluation of Limited-Area Models for the Representation of the Diurnal Cycle and Contrasting Nights in CASES-99 , 2008 .

[18]  Joan Cuxart,et al.  CASES-99: a comprehensive investigation of the stable nocturnal boundary layer , 2002 .

[19]  H. Pan,et al.  Nonlocal Boundary Layer Vertical Diffusion in a Medium-Range Forecast Model , 1996 .

[20]  J. Dudhia,et al.  Coupling an Advanced Land Surface–Hydrology Model with the Penn State–NCAR MM5 Modeling System. Part I: Model Implementation and Sensitivity , 2001 .

[21]  Z. Pu,et al.  Sensitivity of Numerical Simulation of Early Rapid Intensification of Hurricane Emily (2005) to Cloud Microphysical and Planetary Boundary Layer Parameterizations , 2008 .

[22]  E. Mlawer,et al.  Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave , 1997 .

[23]  Jun A. Zhang,et al.  Evaluation of Planetary Boundary Layer Parameterizations in Tropical Cyclones by Comparison of In Situ Observations and High-Resolution Simulations of Hurricane Isabel (2003). Part I: Initialization, Maximum Winds, and the Outer-Core Boundary Layer , 2009 .

[24]  J. Pleim.  A Combined Local and Nonlocal Closure Model for the Atmospheric Boundary Layer. Part I: Model Description and Testing , 2007 .

[25]  J. Dudhia,et al.  Evaluation of the Weather Research and Forecasting model on forecasting low‐level jets: implications for wind energy , 2009 .

[26]  Sethu Raman,et al.  A review and comparative evaluation of multilevel boundary layer parameterizations for first‐order and turbulent kinetic energy closure schemes , 1988 .

[27]  J. D. Tarpley,et al.  Implementation of Noah land surface model advances in the National Centers for Environmental Prediction operational mesoscale Eta model , 2003 .

[28]  J. Dudhia,et al.  A New Vertical Diffusion Package with an Explicit Treatment of Entrainment Processes , 2006 .

[29]  Albert A. M. Holtslag,et al.  Single column modeling of the diurnal cycle based on CASES99 data - GABLS second intercomparison project , 2006 .

[30]  Scott A. Braun,et al.  Sensitivity of High-Resolution Simulations of Hurricane Bob (1991) to Planetary Boundary Layer Parameterizations , 2000 .

[31]  Albert A. M. Holtslag,et al.  Intermittent Turbulence in the Stable Boundary Layer over Land. Part III: A Classification for Observations during CASES-99 , 2003 .