Uncertainty Analysis of the Standard Delay-and-Sum Beamformer and Array Calibration

Beamforming has become an ubiquitous task in aeroacoustic noise measurements for source localization and power estimation. The standard delay-and-sum (DAS) beamformer is the most commonly used beamforming algorithm due to its simplicity and robustness and also serves as the basis for more sophisticated algorithms, such as the deconvolution approach for the mapping of acoustic sources (DAMAS). The DAS data reduction equation is a function of many parameters including the microphone locations, microphone transfer functions, temperature and the cross spectral matrix (CSM), where each one of these parameters has a unique uncertainty associated with it. This paper provides a systematic uncertainty analysis of the DAS beamformer and Dougherty’s widely used calibration procedure under the assumption that the underlying mathematical model of incoherent, monopole sources is correct. An analytical multivariate method based on a flrst-order Taylor series expansion and a numerical Monte-Carlo method based on assumed uncertainty distributions for the input variables are considered. The uncertainty of calibration is analyzed using the Monte-Carlo method, whereas the uncertainty of the DAS beamformer is analyzed using both the complex multivariate and the Monte-Carlo methods. It is shown that the multivariate uncertainty analysis method fails when the perturbations are relatively large and/or the output distribution is non-Gaussian, and therefore the Monte-Carlo analysis should be used in the general case. The calibration procedure is shown to greatly reduce the uncertainties in the DAS power estimates. In particular, 95% confldence intervals for the DAS power estimates are presented with simulated data for various scenarios. Moreover, the 95% confldence intervals for the integrated DAS levels at difierent frequencies are computed using experimental data. It is shown that with experimental data, the 95% confldence intervals for the integrated power levels are within §1 dB of the mean levels when the component uncertainties are set at low but achievable values.

[1]  D. Blackstock.  Fundamentals of Physical Acoustics , 2000 .

[2]  B D Hall,et al.  On the propagation of uncertainty in complex-valued quantities , 2004 .

[3]  Hugh W. Coleman,et al.  Experimentation and Uncertainty Analysis for Engineers , 1989 .

[4]  Pieter Sijtsma,et al.  CLEAN Based on Spatial Source Coherence , 2007 .

[5]  S. Oerlemans,et al.  Quantification of Airframe Noise Using Microphone Arrays in Open and Closed wind Tunnels , 2007 .

[6]  B D Hall,et al.  Calculating measurement uncertainty for complex-valued quantities , 2003 .

[7]  T. Brooks,et al.  Measurement of Trailing EDGE Noise Using Directional Array and Coherent Output Power Methods , 2002 .

[8]  J. Bendat,et al.  Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures , 1987 .

[9]  James R. Underbrink,et al.  Aeroacoustic Phased Array Testing in Low Speed Wind Tunnels , 2002 .

[10]  Robert P. Dougherty,et al.  Beamforming In Acoustic Testing , 2002 .

[11]  Robert P. Dougherty,et al.  Advanced Time-Domain Beamforming Techniques , 2004 .

[12]  Thomas F. Brooks,et al.  A Deconvolution Approach for the Mapping of Acoustic Sources (DAMAS) Determined from Phased Microphone Arrays , 2004 .

[13]  Louis N. Cattafesta,et al.  Application of multivariate uncertainty analysis to frequency response function estimates , 2007 .

[14]  Louis N. Cattafesta,et al.  Uncertainty analysis of the two-microphone method , 2007 .

[15]  R. Amiet.  Refraction of sound by a shear layer , 1977 .

[16]  William M. Humphreys,et al.  Aeroacoustic Measurements of a Wing-Flap Configuration , 1997 .

[17]  Robert P. Dougherty,et al.  Extensions of DAMAS and Benefits and Limitations of Deconvolution in Beamforming , 2005 .

[18]  Jr William M. Humphreys,et al.  Effect of Directional Array Size on the Measurement of Airframe Noise Components , 1999 .

[19]  W. Rudin.  Principles of mathematical analysis , 1964 .

[20]  J. Bendat,et al.  Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures , 1971 .

[21]  Jr William M. Humphreys,et al.  Design and Use of Microphone Directional Arrays for Aeroacoustic Measurements , 1998 .

[22]  Don H. Johnson,et al.  Array Signal Processing: Concepts and Techniques , 1993 .

[23]  P. Stoica,et al.  Sparsity constrained deconvolution approaches for acoustic source mapping. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  Fei Liu,et al.  An Analysis of Different Measurement Techniques for Airfoil Trailing Edge Noise , 2008 .

[25]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Matrix computations , 1983 .

[26]  Paolo Castellini,et al.  Acoustic beamforming: Analysis of uncertainty and metrological performances , 2008 .