Incentive-based experiments to characterize pedestrians’ evacuation behaviors under limited visibility

Abstract Pedestrian evacuation dynamics under near zero or limited visibility conditions are usually different from normal evacuation conditions. In previous studies, the competitiveness of evacuees under limited visibility condition is mainly controlled by stimulating their physical and psychological states during evacuation, and the monetary incentive effect has not been investigated. This study aims to investigate the use of monetary incentive to mimic different emergency levels and the resulting effects in evacuation process under limited visibility condition. Two connected areas (7 m × 5 m) enclosed by an iron fence are set up for the single-exit evacuation experiment. A total of 18 evacuation experiments with 30 participants with limited vision were conducted. By controlling different amounts of monetary incentives as different emergency levels, the position of the connecting door in the middle or the edge of two fences and the opening of the exit of one room in two rooms were randomly selected as control variables to reduce the experimental behavior. The results show that the emergency level controlled by monetary incentive has a significant influence on evacuation efficiency. With the increase in incentive level, evacuation time of the participants generally decreased. The emergency level not only improved pedestrian’s walking speed by improving pedestrian’s urgency for evacuation, but also had a significant influence on pedestrian’s route choice. These results suggest that improving the incentive level can reduce the randomness and hysteresis of participants’ path and route selection decision. Findings of this study are valuable resources for proactive pedestrian crowd management under adverse conditions.

[1]  Shing Chung Josh Wong,et al.  Route choice in pedestrian evacuation under conditions of good and zero visibility: Experimental and simulation results , 2012 .

[2]  Jing Zhang,et al.  How are risks generated, developed and amplified? Case study of the crowd collapse at Shanghai Bund on 31 December 2014 , 2017 .

[3]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Dynamics of crowd disasters: an empirical study. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[4]  Rui Jiang,et al.  Wall-following behaviour during evacuation under limited visibility: experiment and modelling , 2020 .

[5]  Giacomo Albi,et al.  Invisible Control of Self-Organizing Agents Leaving Unknown Environments , 2015, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[6]  Eric Wai Ming Lee,et al.  Evacuation performance of individuals and social groups under different visibility conditions: Experiments and surveys , 2020 .

[7]  Bin Jia,et al.  Uni- and bi-directional pedestrian flow in the view-limited condition: Experiments and modeling , 2016 .

[8]  Nirajan Shiwakoti,et al.  Examining effect of architectural adjustment on pedestrian crowd flow at bottleneck , 2018, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.

[9]  Rodrigo Escobar,et al.  Architectural Design for the Survival Optimization of Panicking Fleeing Victims , 2003, ECAL.

[10]  Majid Sarvi,et al.  When ‘push’ does not come to ‘shove’: Revisiting ‘faster is slower’ in collective egress of human crowds , 2019, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

[11]  Qingsheng Wang,et al.  An experimental study of visibility effect on evacuation speed on stairs , 2018 .

[12]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Crowd disasters as systemic failures: analysis of the Love Parade disaster , 2012, EPJ Data Science.

[13]  Nirajan Shiwakoti,et al.  Examining influence of merging architectural features on pedestrian crowd movement , 2015 .

[14]  Edwin R. Galea,et al.  Adaptive Decision-making In Building Exodus In Response To Exit Congestion , 2000 .

[15]  Junmin Chen,et al.  Modeling the effect of visibility on upstairs crowd evacuation by a stochastic FFCA model with finer discretization , 2019, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.

[16]  C. W. Johnson,et al.  Lessons from the evacuation of the world trade centre, 9/11 2001 for the development of computer-based simulations , 2005, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[17]  Daniele Peri,et al.  Robust design optimization for egressing pedestrians in unknown environments , 2019, Applied Mathematical Modelling.

[18]  Nirajan Shiwakoti,et al.  A review on the performance of an obstacle near an exit on pedestrian crowd evacuation , 2019, Safety Science.

[19]  Won-Hwa Hong,et al.  Evacuation performance of individuals in different visibility conditions , 2011 .

[20]  Wenliang Su,et al.  Quantitative measurement of social repulsive force in pedestrian movements based on physiological responses , 2019 .

[21]  Rui Jiang,et al.  Evacuation dynamics considering pedestrians’ movement behavior change with fire and smoke spreading , 2017 .

[22]  Russell R. Dynes,et al.  Mass Panic and Social Attachment: The Dynamics of Human Behavior , 2008 .

[23]  Wei Lv,et al.  A multi-grid model for pedestrian evacuation in a room without visibility , 2015 .

[24]  H. Kelley,et al.  Collective behavior in a simulated panic situation , 1965 .

[25]  Wei Wang,et al.  Empirical investigation on safety constraints of merging pedestrian crowd through macroscopic and microscopic analysis. , 2016, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[26]  Nirajan Shiwakoti,et al.  Controlled Experiments to Examine Different Exit Designs on Crowd Evacuation Dynamics , 2016 .

[27]  Ruggiero Lovreglio,et al.  The Role of Herding Behaviour in Exit Choice During Evacuation , 2014 .

[28]  Majid Sarvi,et al.  ‘Herding’ in direction choice-making during collective escape of crowds: How likely is it and what moderates it? , 2019, Safety Science.

[29]  Peng Wang,et al.  Experimental and modeling study on evacuation under good and limited visibility in a supermarket , 2018, Fire Safety Journal.

[30]  Lubos Buzna,et al.  Self-Organized Pedestrian Crowd Dynamics: Experiments, Simulations, and Design Solutions , 2005, Transp. Sci..

[31]  Harri Ehtamo,et al.  Pedestrian behavior and exit selection in evacuation of a corridor – An experimental study , 2012 .

[32]  Majid Sarvi,et al.  Evacuation behaviour of crowds under high and low levels of urgency: Experiments of reaction time, exit choice and exit-choice adaptation , 2020 .

[33]  Xing-Li Li,et al.  Effect of uncertain information on pedestrian dynamics under adverse sight conditions , 2019, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.

[34]  A. Mintz,et al.  Non-adaptive group behavior. , 1951, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[35]  Nirajan Shiwakoti,et al.  A State-of-the-Art Review on Empirical Data Collection for External Governed Pedestrians Complex Movement , 2018, Journal of Advanced Transportation.

[36]  Serge P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Emergency Door Capacity: Influence of Door Width, Population Composition and Stress Level , 2012 .

[37]  Rui Jiang,et al.  Pedestrian evacuation in view and hearing limited condition: The impact of communication and memory , 2016 .

[38]  Ashish Verma,et al.  A review of studies on understanding crowd dynamics in the context of crowd safety in mass religious gatherings , 2017 .

[39]  Angel Garcimartín,et al.  Flow of pedestrians through narrow doors with different competitiveness , 2016 .

[40]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Experiment, theory, and simulation of the evacuation of a room without visibility. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.