Passengers’ Intentions to Use Public Transport during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study of Bangkok and Jakarta

Several problems have arisen due to the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly in the public transportation sector. Data from 2021 show that the number of bus passengers in Bangkok has decreased by 40–60% below normal conditions, and the number of bus passengers in Jakarta has decreased by around 76% compared to June 2019. In the new normal period, public transport is required to implement strict health protocols in its operations. This paper aims to evaluate potential indicators underlying the intention to use public transport during a pandemic. The target groups are public and paratransit buses in Bangkok and Jakarta, two metropolitan areas in ASEAN that have been greatly affected by this pandemic. A total of 400 questionnaires were distributed in each city. The outcome from the structural equation model reveals a relatively similar finding in both cities. Tangibility is one of the five dimensions of service quality that is influential in both cities; this indicator affects the intention to use public transportation in Jakarta (Coeff. = 14.670, p-value < 0.001) and Bangkok (Coeff. = 1.164, p-value < 0.001). In this study, confidence (CO) is significant for the intention to use public transportation in both cities with a coefficient of 0.105 for Bangkok and 0.969 for Jakarta. Furthermore, the health measure indicator (HM) has a significant value on passenger confidence (CO) in using public transportation for both cities (Coeff. = 0.808, p-value = <0.001 in Bangkok and Coeff. = −1.413, p-value = 0.008 in Jakarta). Health measures such as wearing a mask, always washing hands and not traveling if unwell are considered to be the right policies to prevent the spread of the virus during the COVID-19 pandemic. This practical implication can become a core strategy for improving the quality of public transport services in similar cities.

[1]  J. Cano,et al.  A methodology for evaluating digital contact tracing apps based on the COVID-19 experience , 2022, Scientific Reports.

[2]  Kasem Choocharukul,et al.  Factors Influencing Battery Electric Vehicle Adoption in Thailand—Expanding the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology’s Variables , 2022, Sustainability.

[3]  T. Toharudin,et al.  Jakarta Pandemic to Endemic Transition: Forecasting COVID-19 Using NNAR and LSTM , 2022, Applied Sciences.

[4]  A. Kodaka,et al.  Impact of COVID-19 Measures on Mobility in Bangkok, Thailand , 2022, Journal of Disaster Research.

[5]  Reny Nadlifatin,et al.  Public utility vehicle service quality and customer satisfaction in the Philippines during the COVID-19 pandemic , 2022, Utilities Policy.

[6]  Chao Chen,et al.  Investigating the effectiveness of COVID-19 pandemic countermeasures on the use of public transport: A case study of The Netherlands , 2022, Transport Policy.

[7]  Alev Taskin,et al.  Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy AHP-WASPAS based public transportation service quality evaluation by a new extension of SERVQUAL Model: P-SERVQUAL 4.0 , 2021, Expert Syst. Appl..

[8]  J. Taylor,et al.  Investigating the association between mass transit adoption and COVID-19 infections in US metropolitan areas , 2021, Science of The Total Environment.

[9]  Eugene Sogbe The evolving impact of coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on public transportation in Ghana , 2021, Case Studies on Transport Policy.

[10]  Y. Hayashi,et al.  COVID-19 Countermeasures and Passengers’ Confidence of Urban Rail Travel in Bangkok , 2021, Sustainability.

[11]  Mohamed Amine Bouzaghrane,et al.  Public transit use in the United States in the era of COVID-19: Transit riders’ travel behavior in the COVID-19 impact and recovery period , 2021, Transport Policy.

[12]  Dong‐Kyu Kim,et al.  A comparative analysis of the users of private cars and public transportation for intermodal options under Mobility-as-a-Service in Seoul , 2021, Travel Behaviour and Society.

[13]  R. Rossi,et al.  Travel Demand Prediction during COVID-19 Pandemic: Educational and Working Trips at the University of Padova , 2021, Sustainability.

[14]  D. Rezende,et al.  Challenges for public transportation: Consequences and possible alternatives for the Covid-19 pandemic through strategic digital city application , 2021 .

[15]  V. Yilmaz,et al.  Measuring service quality of the light rail public transportation: A case study on Eskisehir in Turkey , 2021 .

[16]  T. Rahul,et al.  Psychological impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on the mode choice behaviour: A hybrid choice modelling approach , 2021, Transport Policy.

[17]  D. Graham,et al.  Social distancing in public transport: mobilising new technologies for demand management under the Covid-19 crisis , 2021, Transportation.

[18]  Bobby Ardiansyah Miraja,et al.  The Effect of Service Quality on Customer Satisfaction in an Automotive After-Sales Service , 2021, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity.

[19]  M. A. Javid,et al.  Exploring the Traveler’s Intentions to Use Public Transport during the COVID-19 Pandemic While Complying with Precautionary Measures , 2021, Applied Sciences.

[20]  L. Fuentes-Moraleda,et al.  Understanding the new post-COVID-19 risk scenario: Outlooks and challenges for a new era of tourism , 2021, Tourism management.

[21]  S. Majumdar,et al.  A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker) , 2021, Nature Human Behaviour.

[22]  M. Parida,et al.  Demystifying service quality of Multimodal Transportation Hub (MMTH) through measuring users’ satisfaction of public transport , 2021 .

[23]  P. Wetchayont Investigation on the Impacts of COVID-19 Lockdown and Influencing Factors on Air Quality in Greater Bangkok, Thailand , 2021, Advances in Meteorology.

[24]  W. Pan-ngum,et al.  Evaluating the Impact of Intervention Strategies on the First Wave and Predicting the Second Wave of COVID-19 in Thailand: A Mathematical Modeling Study , 2021, Biology.

[25]  M. Suchanek,et al.  Mobility Behaviour in View of the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic—Public Transport Users in Gdansk Case Study , 2021 .

[26]  Ning Jia,et al.  Understanding public transport satisfaction in post COVID-19 pandemic , 2021 .

[27]  Zsófia Kenesei,et al.  Attitudes to forced adoption of new technologies in public transportation services , 2020 .

[28]  O. Cats,et al.  Public transport planning adaption under the COVID-19 pandemic crisis: literature review of research needs and directions , 2020, Transport Reviews.

[29]  H. Miller,et al.  The impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on public transit demand in the United States , 2020, PloS one.

[30]  K. Song,et al.  A Study on the Behavioral Change of Passengers on Sustainable Air Transport after COVID-19 , 2020, Sustainability.

[31]  J. Luo,et al.  Travel Anxiety, Risk Attitude and Travel Intentions towards “Travel Bubble” Destinations in Hong Kong: Effect of the Fear of COVID-19 , 2020, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[32]  N. C. Tiglao,et al.  The perception of service quality among paratransit users in Metro Manila using structural equations modelling (SEM) approach , 2020, Research in Transportation Economics.

[33]  T. Tjørnhøj‐Thomsen,et al.  Implementing social distancing policy measures in the battle against the coronavirus: protocol of a comparative study of Denmark and Sweden , 2020, Implementation Science Communications.

[34]  J. Ji,et al.  Prevention and control of COVID-19 in public transportation: Experience from China , 2020, Environmental Pollution.

[35]  Ziaul Haque Munim,et al.  Young people's perceived service quality and environmental performance of hybrid electric bus service , 2020 .

[36]  Armando Cartenì,et al.  How mobility habits influenced the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic: Results from the Italian case study , 2020, Science of The Total Environment.

[37]  K. Tantrakarnapa,et al.  Influencing factors of COVID-19 spreading: a case study of Thailand , 2020, Journal of Public Health.

[38]  Imam Baihaqi,et al.  Evaluasi Kualitas Pelayanan Pada Industri Angkutan Umum: Studi Kasus Mikrotrans Jak Lingko , 2020, Jurnal Sains dan Seni ITS.

[39]  Emmanuel Mogaji,et al.  Impact of COVID-19 on transportation in Lagos, Nigeria☆ , 2020, Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives.

[40]  Nicholas P. Jewell,et al.  Caution Warranted: Using the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Model for Predicting the Course of the COVID-19 Pandemic , 2020, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[41]  H. Rothan,et al.  The epidemiology and pathogenesis of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak , 2020, Journal of Autoimmunity.

[42]  Mengyuan Zhu,et al.  The Impact of Service Quality and Customer Satisfaction on Reuse Intention in Urban Rail Transit in Tianjin, China , 2020 .

[43]  Jessica Berg,et al.  The Importance of Public Transport for Mobility and Everyday Activities among Rural Residents , 2019, Social Sciences.

[44]  M. Farooq,et al.  Impact of service quality on customer satisfaction in Malaysia airlines: A PLS-SEM approach , 2018 .

[45]  Enoch F. Sam,et al.  SERVQUAL analysis of public bus transport services in Kumasi metropolis, Ghana: Core user perspectives , 2017 .

[46]  Jirasek Trimetsoontorn,et al.  Examining the relationships between service quality, perceived value, customer satisfaction and purchase intentions: a marketing study of Bangkok's metropolitan rapid transit system, Thailand , 2017 .

[47]  V. Yilmaz,et al.  The effects of service quality, image, and customer satisfaction on customer complaints and loyalty in high-speed rail service in Turkey: a proposal of the structural equation model , 2017 .

[48]  Juan de Oña,et al.  Transit service quality analysis using cluster analysis and decision trees: a step forward to personalized marketing in public transportation , 2016 .

[49]  M. López-Lambas,et al.  The importance of service quality attributes in public transportation: Narrowing the gap between scientific research and practitioners' needs , 2016 .

[50]  Laura Eboli,et al.  Relationships between rail passengers’ satisfaction and service quality: a framework for identifying key service factors , 2015, Public Transp..

[51]  Jadranka J. Jovic,et al.  Customer perception of service quality in public transport , 2014 .

[52]  Chao-Che Hsu,et al.  Improving transportation service quality based on information fusion , 2014 .

[53]  Dickson Okoree Mireku,et al.  Service Quality and Customer Satisfaction of Public Transport on Cape Coast-Accra Route, Ghana , 2014 .

[54]  Juan de Oña,et al.  Perceived service quality in bus transit service: A structural equation approach , 2013 .

[55]  Hung-Che Wu,et al.  A hierarchical model of service quality in the airline industry , 2013 .

[56]  Benedetto Barabino,et al.  Measuring service quality in urban bus transport: a modified SERVQUAL approach , 2012 .

[57]  E. D. de Run,et al.  Private healthcare quality: applying a SERVQUAL model. , 2010, International journal of health care quality assurance.

[58]  Kai-Chieh Hu,et al.  Application of perceived value model to identify factors affecting passengers' repurchase intentions on city bus: A case of the Taipei metropolitan area , 2003 .

[59]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research , 1985 .