Comparison of the 2-, 6-, and 12-minute walk tests in patients with stroke.

This study assessed inter- and intrarater reliability and sensitivity to change of the 2-, 6-, and 12-minute walk tests following stroke. A convenience sample of patients enrolled in an inpatient stroke rehabilitation program participated in the standardization protocol. The 2-, 6-, and 12-minute walk tests were performed and inter- and intrarater reliability and responsiveness to change assessed. The interrater intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for the 2-, 6-, and 12-minute walk tests were, respectively, 0.85, 0.78, and 0.68 (p < 0.0007 for each). The intrarater ICCs were 0.85, 0.74, and 0.71 (p < 0.0003 for each). Responsiveness to change as measured by standardized response mean (SRM) scores was, respectively, 1.34, 1.52, and 1.90 (F = 24.24, p < 0.001). Pearson correlations for the 2-, 6-, and 12-minute walk tests by the same rater on the same day were 2 versus 6 minutes, r = 0.997; 2 versus 12 minutes, r = 0.993; and 6 versus 12 minutes, r = 0.994 (p < 0.0001 for each). The 2-, 6-, and 12-minute walk tests show acceptable inter- and intrarater reliability and high intertest correlations when they are used for the assessment of walking following stroke. The SRM statistic indicates that the 12-minute walk test is the most responsive to change.

[1]  P. Goldie,et al.  Walking speed on parquetry and carpet after stroke: effect of surface and retest reliability , 1999, Clinical Rehabilitation.

[2]  C. Richards,et al.  Responsiveness and predictability of gait speed and other disability measures in acute stroke. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[3]  H. Kurogo,et al.  Determinants and predictors of the maximum walking speed during computer-assisted gait training in hemiparetic stroke patients. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[4]  F. Köseoǧlu,et al.  The effects of a pulmonary rehabilitation program on pulmonary function tests and exercise tolerance in patients with Parkinson's disease. , 1997, Functional neurology.

[5]  Janice J Eng,et al.  Functional Walk Tests in Individuals With Stroke: Relation to Perceived Exertion and Myocardial Exertion , 2002, Stroke.

[6]  J. Arendzen,et al.  Ten-metre walk, with or without a turn? , 1998, Clinical rehabilitation.

[7]  P. Goldie,et al.  Systematic and random error in repeated measurements of temporal and distance parameters of gait after stroke. , 1997, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  A. Woodcock,et al.  Two-, six-, and 12-minute walking tests in respiratory disease. , 1982, British medical journal.

[9]  Leo Smith,et al.  American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation , 1986 .

[10]  P. Yarnell,et al.  Left "Hemi" ADL Learning and Outcome: Limiting Factors , 1987 .

[11]  K. M. Gill,et al.  Clinical Gait Assessment in the Neurologically Impaired , 1984 .

[12]  C. Richards,et al.  Walking speed over 10 metres overestimates locomotor capacity after stroke , 2001, Clinical rehabilitation.

[13]  S. P. Gupta,et al.  Twelve-minute walking test for assessing disability in chronic bronchitis. , 1976, British medical journal.

[14]  G H Guyatt,et al.  Effect of encouragement on walking test performance. , 1984, Thorax.

[15]  G. Demeurisse,et al.  [Motor evaluation in vascular hemiplegia]. , 1979, Bruxelles medical.