Towards the Restoration of Public Trust in Electronic Governments: A Case Study of the E-Filing System in Singapore

E-governments are becoming part and parcel of the virtual economic landscape and are plagued by the same lack of consumer trust that inhibits e-commerce transactions. To make matters worse, the political exclusivity and apathetic bureaucracy of public institutions have amplified the level of difficulty in trying to convince the citizenries to come onboard e-government initiatives. In a preliminary attempt to derive possible developmental implications for the restoring of public trust in e-governments, this study explores the success story of the Singapore's Electronic Tax-Filing (e-Filing) system to reveal how trust-building mechanisms have been incorporated into its techno-structure to attract a phenomenal rate of public user acceptance. Specifically, the case examines the means by which process-based, characteristic-based and institution-based trust have been restored in the e-Filing system. This paper concludes by suggesting that the restoration of public trust can only be achieved through a blend of socio-political strategies and Information Technology.

[1]  R. Herzlinger,et al.  Can public trust in nonprofits and governments be restored? , 1996, Harvard business review.

[2]  J. G. Holmes,et al.  Trust in close relationships. , 1985 .

[3]  Ho Geun Lee,et al.  Do electronic marketplaces lower the price of goods? , 1998, CACM.

[4]  S. Haque,et al.  The Diminishing Publicness of Public Service under the Current Mode of Governance , 2001 .

[5]  Roland Traunmüller,et al.  Electronic business invading the public sector: considerations on change and design , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[6]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[7]  Peter J. Robertson,et al.  Outcomes of Planned Organizational Change in the Public Sector: A Meta-Analytic Comparison to the Private Sector , 1995 .

[8]  W. Galston.  Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity , 1996 .

[9]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  The Emergence of Interpretivism in IS Research , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[10]  Matthew Jones,et al.  Interorganizational systems and trust in strategic alliances , 1999, ICIS.

[11]  B. Husted.  The Ethical Limits of Trust in Business Relations , 1998, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[12]  Michael J. Gallivan,et al.  Striking a balance between trust and control in a virtual organization: a content analysis of open source software case studies , 2001, Inf. Syst. J..

[13]  Shan Ling Pan,et al.  Structurational analysis of e-government initiatives: a case study of SCO , 2003, Decis. Support Syst..

[14]  P. Kollock.  The Production of Trust in Online Markets , 1999 .

[15]  Frank Bannister,et al.  Dismantling the silos: extracting new value from IT investments in public administration , 2001, Inf. Syst. J..

[16]  A. Ho.  Reinventing Local Governments and the E‐Government Initiative , 2002 .

[17]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1993 .

[18]  Juri Stratford.  Computerized and networked government information column , 2002 .

[19]  Diana Burley Gant,et al.  WEB PORTALS AND THEIR ROLE IN E-GOVERNMENT , 2001 .

[20]  Shan Ling Pan,et al.  E-Government Implementation: Balancing Collaboration and Control in Stakeholder Management , 2007, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[21]  Ramayya Krishnan,et al.  ServiceNet: An Agent-Based Framework for One-Stop E-Government Services , 2001 .

[22]  Shan Ling Pan,et al.  Enterprise System as an Orchestrator of Dynamic Capability Development: A Case Study of the IRAS and TechCo , 2004, Relevant Theory and Informed Practice.

[23]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Consumer Trust in an Internet Store: A Cross-Cultural Validation , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[24]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Institutional trust and familiarity in online interorganizational relationships , 2003, ECIS.

[25]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[26]  L. Zucker.  Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840–1920. , 1986 .

[27]  Eric Tze Kuan Lim,et al.  In Search of the Total Learning Experience (Tle): a Case Study of Singapore's E-Inclusive Society , 2004, J. Inf. Knowl. Manag..

[28]  Chee-Wee Tan,et al.  Stakeholder Management: The Effects of Resource Dependency on Trust and Control Strategies , 2005 .

[29]  D. Gefen,et al.  E-commerce: the role of familiarity and trust , 2000 .

[30]  Eric T. K. Lim.  The Infocomm Development Authority Of Singapore (IDA) , 2004 .

[31]  H. George Frederickson,et al.  The spirit of public administration , 1996 .

[32]  R. Merton,et al.  The Focused Interview: A Manual of Problems and Procedures , 1990 .

[33]  M. Jae Moon,et al.  Municipal Reinvention: Managerial Values and Diffusion among Municipalities , 2001 .

[34]  Peter G. Neumann.  Identity-related misuse , 1997, CACM.

[35]  M. Shamsul Haque,et al.  Legitimation crisis: a challenge for public service in the next century , 1998 .

[36]  K. Eisenhardt.  Better Stories and Better Constructs: The Case for Rigor and Comparative Logic , 1991 .

[37]  Shan Ling Pan,et al.  Managing user acceptance towards enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems – understanding the dissonance between user expectations and managerial policies , 2005, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[38]  Joseph P. Cannon,et al.  p.535) and ‘Understanding the influence of national culture on the development of trust’, Academy of Management Review, . , 1998 .

[39]  J. Lewis,et al.  Trust as a Social Reality , 1985 .

[40]  Richard Heeks.  Citizen Access and the Use of Government Data: Understanding the Barriers , 2002 .

[41]  Shan Ling Pan,et al.  Customer relationship management (CRM) in e-government: a relational perspective , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[42]  Georg Aichholzer,et al.  Organizational challenges to the development of electronic government , 2000, Proceedings 11th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications.

[43]  Shan Ling Pan,et al.  Managing Stakeholder Interests in E-Government Implementation: Lessons Learned from a Singapore E-Government Project , 2007, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[44]  Calvin Meng Lai Chan,et al.  Conflicts in Knowledge Management: Visiting the Hidden Partner , 2004, ECIS.

[45]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Encouraging Citizen Adoption of eGovernment by Building Trust , 2002, Electron. Mark..

[46]  Stephen F. King,et al.  CASE tools and organizational action , 1996, Inf. Syst. J..

[47]  David Silverman,et al.  Qualitative research: meanings or practices? , 1998, Inf. Syst. J..

[48]  M. J. Moon.  The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality? , 2002 .

[49]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Evidence of the Effect of Trust Building Technology in Electronic Markets: Price Premiums and Buyer Behavior , 2002, MIS Q..

[50]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[51]  Evan M. Berman,et al.  Dealing with Cynical Citizens , 1997 .

[52]  Shan Ling Pan,et al.  Enterprise Systems Adoption: A Proposed Contingency Perspective , 2005 .

[53]  R. M. Jansen,et al.  E-government adoption , 2003 .

[54]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust , 1998 .

[55]  Eric T. K. Lim,et al.  E-Learning: In Search of a Total Learning Experience (TLE) , 2002 .

[56]  Petra Schubert,et al.  E-Government meets E-business: a portal site for startup companies in Switzerland , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[57]  Peter Kawalek,et al.  Plus ça change: defensive translations and resistance to IT-enabled change in local government , 2003, ECIS.

[58]  Stuart Bretschneider,et al.  Does the Perception of Red Tape Constrain IT Innovativeness in Organizations? Unexpected Results from a Simultaneous Equation Model and Implications , 2002 .

[59]  Terence R. Mitchell,et al.  Leadership Failures, the Distrusting Public, and Prospects of the Administrative State , 1987 .

[60]  Blair H. Sheppard,et al.  The Grammars of Trust: A Model and General Implications , 1998 .

[61]  Chee-Wee Tan,et al.  What You Think Others Think: Influence of Presumed Influence in e-Collaborations , 2005 .

[62]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Individual Trust in Online Firms: Scale Development and Initial Test , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[63]  Daniel Metlay,et al.  Hazards and Institutional Trustworthiness: Facing a Deficit of Trust , 1996 .

[64]  Shan Ling Pan,et al.  Lim Strategic Convergence of Stakeholder Interests E-governance : Towards a Strategic Convergence of STACKEHOLDER interests , 2003 .

[65]  J. Gabarro.  The development of working relationships , 1990 .

[66]  Rajeev R. Bhattacharya,et al.  A Formal Model of Trust Based on Outcomes , 1998 .