The Stakeholder Perspective on Using Public Polling Displays for Civic Engagement

Public polling displays, i.e. interactive interfaces that offer questionnaires in public space, are promised to engage citizens in a dialog with civic stakeholders around local concerns. Although past studies revealed the core factors that impact their usability, little is known about whether civic stakeholders actually consider the deployment of public polling displays to be valuable. We therefore interviewed 12 members of 10 stakeholder organizations who engaged in four different real-world cases, and analyzed all the underlying activities that ranged from planning the deployments to interpreting the final polling results. We thus report on eight key challenges of public polling display deployments, among which: designing polls so that they are responsive, decisive and accessible yet also generate actionable insights, managing the trust of citizens and stakeholder organizations, and facilitating the accurate interpretation of the polling responses. By understanding the process of public polling display deployments from the perspective of civic stakeholders, we inform its continued evolution towards an opportunistic yet trustworthy civic engagement method.

[1]  Massimo Zancanaro,et al.  Agora2.0: enhancing civic participation through a public display , 2013, C&T '13.

[2]  Bruno Dumas,et al.  Public displays and citizen participation: a systematic literature review and research agenda , 2020 .

[3]  Patrick Olivier,et al.  Leaving the wild: lessons from community technology handovers , 2013, CHI.

[4]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Roam-IO: Engaging with People Tracking Data through an Interactive Physical Data Installation , 2019, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[5]  Mark Rouncefield,et al.  HCI, Civic Engagement & Trust , 2015, CHI.

[6]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Interaction design gone wild: striving for wild theory , 2011, INTR.

[7]  Andrew Vande Moere,et al.  How the Arrangement of Content and Location Impact the Use of Multiple Distributed Public Displays , 2019, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[8]  Mark Bilandzic,et al.  Towards Participatory Action Design Research: Adapting Action Research and Design Science Research Methods for Urban Informatics , 2011, J. Community Informatics.

[9]  Sarah Williams Data Action , 2020 .

[10]  Rob Comber,et al.  Between Grassroots and the Hierarchy: Lessons Learned from the Design of a Public Services Directory , 2018, CHI.

[11]  Jason Dykes,et al.  Designing an exploratory visual interface to the results of citizen surveys , 2014, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[12]  Albrecht Schmidt,et al.  Display Blindness: The Effect of Expectations on Attention towards Digital Signage , 2009, Pervasive.

[13]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  "Everyone Is Talking about It!": A Distributed Approach to Urban Voting Technology and Visualisations , 2015, CHI.

[14]  Gillian R. Hayes The relationship of action research to human-computer interaction , 2011, TCHI.

[15]  Ruth Mugge,et al.  The Design of Smart Product-Service Systems (PSSs): An Exploration of Design Characteristics , 2015 .

[16]  Jin Nakazawa,et al.  Phygital Map: Accessing Digital Multimedia from Physical Map , 2007, 21st International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (AINAW'07).

[17]  Albert Jacob Meijer,et al.  E-governance innovation: Barriers and strategies , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[18]  Jukka Riekki,et al.  Crowdsourcing Public Opinion Using Urban Pervasive Technologies: Lessons From Real‐Life Experiments in Oulu , 2015 .

[19]  Judy Kay,et al.  Foundations for Designing Public Interactive Displays that Provide Value to Users , 2020, CHI.

[20]  Steven Dow,et al.  CommunityCrit: Inviting the Public to Improve and Evaluate Urban Design Ideas through Micro-Activities , 2018, CHI.

[21]  Peter A. Johnson,et al.  Type, tweet, tap, and pass: How smart city technology is creating a transactional citizen , 2020, Gov. Inf. Q..

[22]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Pinsight: A Novel Way of Creating and Sharing Digital Content through 'Things' in the Wild , 2018, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[23]  Ron Wakkary,et al.  HCI interventions with nonprofit organizations: tactics for effective collaboration , 2014, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[24]  Florian Alt,et al.  Vote With Your Feet: Local Community Polling on Urban Screens , 2014, PerDis.

[25]  Jorge Gonçalves,et al.  Motivating participation and improving quality of contribution in ubiquitous crowdsourcing , 2015, Comput. Networks.

[26]  Peter C. Wright,et al.  Viewpoint: empowering communities with situated voting devices , 2012, CHI.

[27]  J. Ponterotto Brief Note on the Origins, Evolution, and Meaning of the Qualitative Research Concept "Thick Description" , 2006 .

[28]  Martin Tomitsch,et al.  Power to the People: Hacking the City with Plug-In Interfaces for Community Engagement , 2019 .

[29]  Jorge Gonçalves,et al.  Eliciting situated feedback: A comparison of paper, web forms and public displays , 2014, Displays.

[30]  Andrew Vande Moere,et al.  Street infographics: raising awareness of local issues through a situated urban visualization , 2013, PerDis.

[31]  Nemanja Memarovic,et al.  "Fun place within a serious space": stimulating community interaction and engagement through situated snapshots in a university setting , 2016, MUM.

[32]  Eva Hornecker,et al.  Urban HCI: spatial aspects in the design of shared encounters for media facades , 2012, CHI.

[33]  Martin Tomitsch,et al.  Design Strategies for Overcoming Failures on Public Interactive Displays , 2018, PerDis.

[34]  Burak Pak,et al.  Urban design empowerment through ICT-based platforms in Europe , 2019, International Journal of Urban Sciences.

[35]  T. Ertiö Participatory Apps for Urban Planning—Space for Improvement , 2015 .

[36]  Sander Münster,et al.  A Theoretical Framework for the Evaluation of Massive Digital Participation Systems in Urban Planning , 2019, Journal of Geovisualization and Spatial Analysis.

[37]  Carolin Schröder Through Space and Time: Using Mobile Apps for Urban Participation , 2015 .

[38]  Christian Kray,et al.  Public displays for public participation in urban settings: a survey , 2017, PerDis.

[39]  Andrew Vande Moere,et al.  Conveying a civic issue through data via spatially distributed public visualization and polling displays , 2018, NordiCHI.

[40]  Jukka Riekki,et al.  Exploring Civic Engagement on Public Displays , 2014 .

[41]  P. Parvin Democracy Without Participation: A New Politics for a Disengaged Era , 2018 .

[42]  S. Pandey,et al.  Further Dissecting the Black Box of Citizen Participation: When Does Citizen Involvement Lead to Good Outcomes? , 2011 .

[43]  Nina Valkanova,et al.  Smart Citizen Sentiment Dashboard: A Case Study Into Media Architectural Interfaces , 2014, PerDis.

[44]  Marko Jurmu,et al.  Multipurpose Interactive Public Displays in the Wild: Three Years Later , 2012, Computer.

[45]  Ronald Schroeter,et al.  Vote as you go: blending interfaces for community engagement into the urban space , 2015, C&T.

[46]  Mitchell Harrop,et al.  Uncovering the Honeypot Effect: How Audiences Engage with Public Interactive Systems , 2016, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[47]  Ronald Schroeter,et al.  Engaging new digital locals with interactive urban screens to collaboratively improve the city , 2012, CSCW.

[48]  Judy Kay,et al.  Does the Public Still Look at Public Displays? , 2018, Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol..

[49]  Andrew Vande Moere,et al.  Citizen Dialogue Kit: Public Polling and Data Visualization Displays for Bottom-Up Citizen Participation , 2019, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[50]  Narges Mahyar,et al.  The Civic Data Deluge: Understanding the Challenges of Analyzing Large-Scale Community Input , 2019, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[51]  Christopher A. Le Dantec,et al.  The Problem of Community Engagement: Disentangling the Practices of Municipal Government , 2018, CHI.

[52]  L. Sanders,et al.  Against Deliberation , 1997 .

[53]  Christophe Kolski,et al.  State of the Art on the Cognitive Walkthrough Method, Its Variants and Evolutions , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[54]  Andrew Vande Moere,et al.  The concurrent use of touch and mid-air gestures or floor mat interaction on a public display , 2017, PerDis.

[55]  Kathleen E. Halvorsen,et al.  An Evaluation of Three Democratic, Community-Based Approaches to Citizen Participation: Surveys, Conversations With Community Groups, and Community Dinners , 2001 .

[56]  Andrew Vande Moere,et al.  The role of context in media architecture , 2012, PerDis '12.

[57]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Enticing People to Interact with Large Public Displays in Public Spaces , 2003, INTERACT.

[58]  C. William R. Webster,et al.  Smart governance: Opportunities for technologically-mediated citizen co-production , 2018, Inf. Polity.

[59]  Christian Weichel,et al.  Overcoming interaction blindness through curiosity objects , 2013, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[60]  M. Sheelagh T. Carpendale,et al.  PixelClipper: Supporting Public Engagement and Conversation About Visualizations , 2020, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[61]  Nalini Kotamraju,et al.  Data-driven persona development , 2008, CHI.

[62]  Y. Rogers,et al.  Moving HCI Outdoors: Lessons Learned from Conducting Research in the Wild , 2020 .

[63]  Christian Kray,et al.  Facilitating citizen engagement in situ: assessing the impact of pro-active geofenced notifications , 2016, MobileHCI.

[64]  Jörg Müller,et al.  MyPosition: sparking civic discourse by a public interactive poll visualization , 2014, CSCW.

[65]  Matti Nelimarkka,et al.  A Review of Research on Participation in Democratic Decision-Making Presented at SIGCHI Conferences. Toward an Improved Trading Zone Between Political Science and HCI , 2019, Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact..

[66]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  VoxBox: A Tangible Machine that Gathers Opinions from the Public at Events , 2015, TEI.

[67]  Karim Ladha,et al.  PosterVote: expanding the action repertoire for local political activism , 2014, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[68]  Ronald Schroeter,et al.  People, content, location: sweet spotting urban screens for situated engagement , 2012, DIS '12.

[69]  Marcus Foth,et al.  Augmenting public participation: enhancing planning outcomes through the use of social media and web 2.0 , 2013 .

[70]  S. Arnstein,et al.  Ladder of Citizen Participation , 2020 .

[71]  Thomas C. Beierle USING SOCIAL GOALS TO EVALUATE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN ENVIRONMENTAL DECISIONS , 2005 .

[72]  Markku Turunen,et al.  Challenges in Public Display Deployments: A Taxonomy of External Factors , 2017, CHI.