The essential kinase ATR: ensuring faithful duplication of a challenging genome

[1]  K. Cimprich,et al.  Publisher correction: The essential kinase ATR: ensuring faithful duplication of a challenging genome. , 2017, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[2]  A. Antoni,et al.  Moonlighting at replication forks – a new life for homologous recombination proteins BRCA1, BRCA2 and RAD51 , 2017, FEBS letters.

[3]  W. Haas,et al.  Coupling of Homologous Recombination and the Checkpoint by ATR. , 2017, Molecular cell.

[4]  T. Lange,et al.  Telomeres in cancer: tumour suppression and genome instability , 2017, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[5]  S. Kowalczykowski,et al.  PHF11 promotes DSB resection, ATR signaling, and HR , 2017, Genes & development.

[6]  L. Lindsey-Boltz.  Bringing It All Together: Coupling Excision Repair to the DNA Damage Checkpoint , 2017, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[7]  Miguel G. Blanco,et al.  A Mechanism for Controlled Breakage of Under-replicated Chromosomes during Mitosis. , 2016, Developmental cell.

[8]  Junjie Chen,et al.  RPA-Binding Protein ETAA1 Is an ATR Activator Involved in DNA Replication Stress Response , 2016, Current Biology.

[9]  M. Mann,et al.  Activation of the ATR kinase by the RPA-binding protein ETAA1 , 2016, Nature Cell Biology.

[10]  W. Chazin,et al.  ETAA1 acts at stalled replication forks to maintain genome integrity , 2016, Nature Cell Biology.

[11]  C. Sørensen,et al.  ATM/ATR‐mediated phosphorylation of PALB2 promotes RAD51 function , 2016, EMBO reports.

[12]  D. Bose,et al.  The Dimeric Architecture of Checkpoint Kinases Mec1ATR and Tel1ATM Reveal a Common Structural Organization* , 2016, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[13]  V. Costanzo,et al.  Centromeric DNA replication reconstitution reveals DNA loops and ATR checkpoint suppression , 2016, Nature Cell Biology.

[14]  O. Fernandez-Capetillo,et al.  A Genome-wide CRISPR Screen Identifies CDC25A as a Determinant of Sensitivity to ATR Inhibitors. , 2016, Molecular cell.

[15]  J. Diffley,et al.  Phosphopeptide binding by Sld3 links Dbf4‐dependent kinase to MCM replicative helicase activation , 2016, The EMBO journal.

[16]  N. Seyfried,et al.  ATRIP Deacetylation by SIRT2 Drives ATR Checkpoint Activation by Promoting Binding to RPA-ssDNA. , 2016, Cell reports.

[17]  M. Debatisse,et al.  Signaling from Mus81-Eme2-Dependent DNA Damage Elicited by Chk1 Deficiency Modulates Replication Fork Speed and Origin Usage. , 2016, Cell reports.

[18]  T. Beißbarth,et al.  EEPD1 Rescues Stressed Replication Forks and Maintains Genome Stability by Promoting End Resection and Homologous Recombination Repair , 2015, PLoS genetics.

[19]  Ricky D. Edmondson,et al.  A conserved Polϵ binding module in Ctf18-RFC is required for S-phase checkpoint activation downstream of Mec1 , 2015, Nucleic acids research.

[20]  Jessica L. Boisvert,et al.  Distinct but Concerted Roles of ATR, DNA-PK, and Chk1 in Countering Replication Stress during S Phase. , 2015, Molecular cell.

[21]  D. Cortez,et al.  The Replication Checkpoint Prevents Two Types of Fork Collapse without Regulating Replisome Stability. , 2015, Molecular cell.

[22]  L. Karnitz,et al.  Molecular Pathways: Targeting ATR in Cancer Therapy , 2015, Clinical Cancer Research.

[23]  M. Méchali,et al.  DNA replication origin activation in space and time , 2015, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[24]  P. Jallepalli,et al.  ATR-mediated phosphorylation of FANCI regulates dormant origin firing in response to replication stress. , 2015, Molecular cell.

[25]  L. Rasmussen,et al.  Increased Rrm2 gene dosage reduces fragile site breakage and prolongs survival of ATR mutant mice , 2015, Genes & development.

[26]  Haiyuan Yu,et al.  Phosphoproteomics reveals distinct modes of Mec1/ATR signaling during DNA replication. , 2015, Molecular cell.

[27]  J. Diffley,et al.  Regulated Eukaryotic DNA Replication Origin Firing with Purified Proteins , 2015, Nature.

[28]  Raquel Herrador,et al.  Rad51-mediated replication fork reversal is a global response to genotoxic treatments in human cells , 2015, The Journal of cell biology.

[29]  M. Lopes,et al.  DNA2 drives processing and restart of reversed replication forks in human cells , 2015, The Journal of cell biology.

[30]  M. Lopes,et al.  Replication fork reversal in eukaryotes: from dead end to dynamic response , 2015, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[31]  A. Shevchenko,et al.  Interaction of Chk1 with Treslin negatively regulates the initiation of chromosomal DNA replication. , 2015, Molecular cell.

[32]  Z. Elazar,et al.  PLEKHM1: a multiprotein adaptor for the endolysosomal system. , 2015, Molecular cell.

[33]  A. Sancar,et al.  RHINO forms a stoichiometric complex with the 9-1-1 checkpoint clamp and mediates ATR-Chk1 signaling , 2015, Cell cycle.

[34]  G. Leuzzi,et al.  Checkpoint-dependent and independent roles of the Werner syndrome protein in preserving genome integrity in response to mild replication stress , 2014, Nucleic acids research.

[35]  C. Schildkraut,et al.  Phosphorylated RPA recruits PALB2 to stalled DNA replication forks to facilitate fork recovery , 2014, The Journal of cell biology.

[36]  G. Shivashankar,et al.  ATR Mediates a Checkpoint at the Nuclear Envelope in Response to Mechanical Stress , 2014, Cell.

[37]  David J. Chen,et al.  SUMOylation of ATRIP potentiates DNA damage signaling by boosting multiple protein interactions in the ATR pathway , 2014, Genes & development.

[38]  S. Jarrett,et al.  PKA-mediated phosphorylation of ATR promotes recruitment of XPA to UV-induced DNA damage. , 2014, Molecular cell.

[39]  J. Kobarg,et al.  "Stop Ne(c)king around": How interactomics contributes to functionally characterize Nek family kinases. , 2014, World journal of biological chemistry.

[40]  S. West,et al.  MUS81-EME2 Promotes Replication Fork Restart , 2014, Cell reports.

[41]  D. Cortez,et al.  Fork reversal, too much of a good thing , 2014, Cell cycle.

[42]  L. Zou,et al.  PRP19 transforms into a sensor of RPA-ssDNA after DNA damage and drives ATR activation via a ubiquitin-mediated circuitry. , 2014, Molecular cell.

[43]  N. Mailand,et al.  ATR Prohibits Replication Catastrophe by Preventing Global Exhaustion of RPA , 2013, Cell.

[44]  K. Cimprich,et al.  Causes and consequences of replication stress , 2013, Nature Cell Biology.

[45]  H. Lou,et al.  hPrimpol1/CCDC111 is a human DNA primase‐polymerase required for the maintenance of genome integrity , 2013, EMBO reports.

[46]  E. Salido,et al.  PrimPol, an Archaic Primase/Polymerase Operating in Human Cells , 2013, Molecular cell.

[47]  Julie Bianchi,et al.  PrimPol Bypasses UV Photoproducts during Eukaryotic Chromosomal DNA Replication , 2013, Molecular cell.

[48]  L. Blanco,et al.  Repriming of DNA synthesis at stalled replication forks by human PrimPol , 2013, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[49]  S. West,et al.  Coordinated actions of SLX1-SLX4 and MUS81-EME1 for Holliday junction resolution in human cells. , 2013, Molecular cell.

[50]  E. Brown,et al.  RNF4 and PLK1 are required for replication fork collapse in ATR-deficient cells , 2013, Genes & development.

[51]  M. Bignami,et al.  Survival of the Replication Checkpoint Deficient Cells Requires MUS81-RAD52 Function , 2013, PLoS genetics.

[52]  N. Bec,et al.  FANCD2 binds MCM proteins and controls replisome function upon activation of s phase checkpoint signaling. , 2013, Molecular cell.

[53]  D. Cortez,et al.  DNA damage response: three levels of DNA repair regulation. , 2013, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[54]  Zhao-Qi Wang,et al.  An Essential Function for the ATR-Activation-Domain (AAD) of TopBP1 in Mouse Development and Cellular Senescence , 2013, PLoS genetics.

[55]  J. Qin,et al.  ATR phosphorylates SMARCAL1 to prevent replication fork collapse. , 2013, Genes & development.

[56]  A. Bradley,et al.  ATR acts stage specifically to regulate multiple aspects of mammalian meiotic silencing , 2013, Genes & development.

[57]  M. Debatisse,et al.  Stepwise Activation of the ATR Signaling Pathway upon Increasing Replication Stress Impacts Fragile Site Integrity , 2013, PLoS genetics.

[58]  Manikandan Paramasivam,et al.  ATR-dependent phosphorylation of FANCM at serine 1045 is essential for FANCM functions. , 2013, Cancer research.

[59]  W. Dunphy,et al.  The Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 (MRN) complex has a specific role in the activation of Chk1 in response to stalled replication forks , 2013, Molecular biology of the cell.

[60]  K. Cimprich,et al.  A role for the MRN complex in ATR activation via TOPBP1 recruitment. , 2013, Molecular cell.

[61]  J. Diffley,et al.  Controlling DNA replication origins in response to DNA damage – inhibit globally, activate locally , 2013, Journal of Cell Science.

[62]  J. Sale.  Translesion DNA synthesis and mutagenesis in eukaryotes. , 2013, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[63]  S. Puig,et al.  Function and Regulation of Yeast Ribonucleotide Reductase: Cell Cycle, Genotoxic Stress, and Iron Bioavailability , 2013, Biomedical journal.

[64]  Kumar Somyajit,et al.  ATM- and ATR-Mediated Phosphorylation of XRCC3 Regulates DNA Double-Strand Break-Induced Checkpoint Activation and Repair , 2013, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[65]  P. Burgers,et al.  Lagging strand maturation factor Dna2 is a component of the replication checkpoint initiation machinery. , 2013, Genes & development.

[66]  S. Cantor,et al.  FANCJ/BACH1 Acetylation at Lysine 1249 Regulates the DNA Damage Response , 2012, PLoS genetics.

[67]  M. Pagano,et al.  Cyclin F-Mediated Degradation of Ribonucleotide Reductase M2 Controls Genome Integrity and DNA Repair , 2012, Cell.

[68]  S. West,et al.  The DNA translocase activity of FANCM protects stalled replication forks. , 2012, Human molecular genetics.

[69]  V. Costanzo,et al.  Mechanisms of replication fork protection: a safeguard for genome stability , 2012, Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology.

[70]  T. Itoh,et al.  Replisome stability at defective DNA replication forks is independent of S phase checkpoint kinases. , 2012, Molecular cell.

[71]  B. Eichman,et al.  SMARCAL1 catalyzes fork regression and Holliday junction migration to maintain genome stability during DNA replication. , 2012, Genes & development.

[72]  V. Bohr,et al.  WRN helicase regulates the ATR–CHK1-induced S-phase checkpoint pathway in response to topoisomerase-I–DNA covalent complexes , 2011, Journal of Cell Science.

[73]  R. Medema,et al.  Wee1 controls genomic stability during replication by regulating the Mus81-Eme1 endonuclease , 2011, The Journal of cell biology.

[74]  S. Jackson,et al.  Structure-Specific DNA Endonuclease Mus81/Eme1 Generates DNA Damage Caused by Chk1 Inactivation , 2011, PloS one.

[75]  J. Glover,et al.  ATR autophosphorylation as a molecular switch for checkpoint activation. , 2011, Molecular cell.

[76]  E. Nam,et al.  Thr-1989 Phosphorylation Is a Marker of Active Ataxia Telangiectasia-mutated and Rad3-related (ATR) Kinase* , 2011, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[77]  S. Elledge,et al.  A DNA Damage Response Screen Identifies RHINO, a 9-1-1 and TopBP1 Interacting Protein Required for ATR Signaling , 2011, Science.

[78]  P. Burgers,et al.  Cell-cycle-specific activators of the Mec1/ATR checkpoint kinase. , 2011, Biochemical Society transactions.

[79]  Neerja Karnani,et al.  The effect of the intra-S-phase checkpoint on origins of replication in human cells. , 2011, Genes & development.

[80]  A. Lehmann,et al.  ATR-mediated phosphorylation of DNA polymerase η is needed for efficient recovery from UV damage , 2011, The Journal of cell biology.

[81]  J. Blow,et al.  Chk1 inhibits replication factory activation but allows dormant origin firing in existing factories , 2010, The Journal of cell biology.

[82]  Philippe Pasero,et al.  Analysis of replication profiles reveals key role of RFC-Ctf18 in yeast replication stress response , 2010, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[83]  M. Lopes,et al.  Rad51 protects nascent DNA from Mre11 dependent degradation and promotes continuous DNA synthesis , 2010, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[84]  M. Bignami,et al.  ATR and ATM differently regulate WRN to prevent DSBs at stalled replication forks and promote replication fork recovery , 2010, The EMBO journal.

[85]  T. Tsurimoto,et al.  Stable Interaction between the Human Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen Loader Complex Ctf18-Replication Factor C (RFC) and DNA Polymerase ϵ Is Mediated by the Cohesion-specific Subunits, Ctf18, Dcc1, and Ctf8* , 2010, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[86]  T. Helleday,et al.  Chk1 promotes replication fork progression by controlling replication initiation , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[87]  Todd D. Westergard,et al.  Phosphorylation of MLL by ATR is Required for Execution of Mammalian S Phase Checkpoint , 2010, Nature.

[88]  David P. Toczyski,et al.  Damage-Induced Phosphorylation of Sld3 is Important to Block Late Origin Firing , 2010, Nature.

[89]  J. Diffley,et al.  Checkpoint Dependent Inhibition of DNA Replication Initiation by Sld3 and Dbf4 Phosphorylation , 2010, Nature.

[90]  K. Cimprich,et al.  Continued primer synthesis at stalled replication forks contributes to checkpoint activation , 2010, The Journal of cell biology.

[91]  T. Helleday,et al.  Hydroxyurea-Stalled Replication Forks Become Progressively Inactivated and Require Two Different RAD51-Mediated Pathways for Restart and Repair , 2010, Molecular cell.

[92]  R. Schwab,et al.  ATR activation and replication fork restart are defective in FANCM‐deficient cells , 2010, The EMBO journal.

[93]  J. Glover,et al.  BACH1/FANCJ acts with TopBP1 and participates early in DNA replication checkpoint control. , 2010, Molecular cell.

[94]  J. Blow,et al.  Replication factory activation can be decoupled from the replication timing program by modulating Cdk levels , 2010, The Journal of cell biology.

[95]  P. Burgers,et al.  The unstructured C-terminal tail of the 9-1-1 clamp subunit Ddc1 activates Mec1/ATR via two distinct mechanisms. , 2009, Molecular cell.

[96]  L. Haracska,et al.  Role of Double-Stranded DNA Translocase Activity of Human HLTF in Replication of Damaged DNA , 2009, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[97]  J. Borowiec,et al.  Human RPA phosphorylation by ATR stimulates DNA synthesis and prevents ssDNA accumulation during DNA-replication stress , 2009, Journal of Cell Science.

[98]  F. Mulero,et al.  A mouse model of ATR-Seckel shows embryonic replicative stress and accelerated aging , 2009, Nature Genetics.

[99]  Shan Yan,et al.  TopBP1 and DNA polymerase-α directly recruit the 9-1-1 complex to stalled DNA replication forks , 2009, The Journal of cell biology.

[100]  H. Niida,et al.  Cyclin A–Cdk1 regulates the origin firing program in mammalian cells , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[101]  C. Bassing,et al.  ATR and H2AX Cooperate in Maintaining Genome Stability under Replication Stress* , 2009, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[102]  P. Pasero,et al.  Defining replication origin efficiency using DNA fiber assays , 2009, Chromosome Research.

[103]  P. Burgers,et al.  Yeast DNA Replication Protein Dpb11 Activates the Mec1/ATR Checkpoint Kinase* , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[104]  E. Nam,et al.  Dpb11 activates the Mec1–Ddc2 complex , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[105]  A. Nussenzweig,et al.  Multiple autophosphorylation sites are dispensable for murine ATM activation in vivo , 2008, The Journal of cell biology.

[106]  J. Huberman,et al.  Checkpoint-Dependent Regulation of Origin Firing and Replication Fork Movement in Response to DNA Damage in Fission Yeast , 2008, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[107]  S. Elledge,et al.  FANCM and FAAP24 function in ATR-mediated checkpoint signaling independently of the Fanconi anemia core complex. , 2008, Molecular cell.

[108]  D. Cortez,et al.  Activation of ATR and related PIKKs , 2008, Cell cycle.

[109]  K. Cimprich,et al.  ATR: an essential regulator of genome integrity , 2008, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[110]  R. Zhao,et al.  TopBP1 activates ATR through ATRIP and a PIKK regulatory domain. , 2008, Genes & development.

[111]  Vincenzo Costanzo,et al.  Plx1 is required for chromosomal DNA replication under stressful conditions , 2008, The EMBO journal.

[112]  Y. Pommier,et al.  The Mammalian DNA Replication Elongation Checkpoint: Implication of Chk1 and Relationship with Origin Firing as Determined by Single DNA Molecule and Single Cell Analyses , 2007, Cell cycle.

[113]  R. Kanaar,et al.  The structure-specific endonuclease Mus81 contributes to replication restart by generating double-strand DNA breaks , 2007, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[114]  A. Kumagai,et al.  The Rad9-Hus1-Rad1 Checkpoint Clamp Regulates Interaction of TopBP1 with ATR* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[115]  Xin Xu,et al.  Cyclin-dependent kinase 2 dependent phosphorylation of ATRIP regulates the G2-M checkpoint response to DNA damage. , 2007, Cancer research.

[116]  T. Halazonetis,et al.  Phosphorylation of ATR-interacting protein on Ser239 mediates an interaction with breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility 1 and checkpoint function. , 2007, Cancer research.

[117]  L. Karnitz,et al.  The Rad9-Hus1-Rad1 (9-1-1) clamp activates checkpoint signaling via TopBP1. , 2007, Genes & development.

[118]  A. Shevchenko,et al.  Ataxia-telangiectasia Mutated (ATM)-dependent Activation of ATR Occurs through Phosphorylation of TopBP1 by ATM* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[119]  D. Gillespie,et al.  Chk1 regulates the density of active replication origins during the vertebrate S phase , 2007, The EMBO journal.

[120]  Y. Pommier,et al.  The Intra-S-Phase Checkpoint Affects both DNA Replication Initiation and Elongation: Single-Cell and -DNA Fiber Analyses , 2007, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[121]  K. Cimprich,et al.  The structural determinants of checkpoint activation. , 2007, Genes & development.

[122]  R. Paules,et al.  Cdc7-Dbf4 and the Human S Checkpoint Response to UVC* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[123]  W. Chazin,et al.  Function of a Conserved Checkpoint Recruitment Domain in ATRIP Proteins , 2007, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[124]  E. Petermann,et al.  Evidence That the ATR/Chk1 Pathway Maintains Normal Replication Fork Progression during Unperturbed S Phase , 2006, Cell cycle.

[125]  A. Nussenzweig,et al.  Autophosphorylation at serine 1987 is dispensable for murine Atm activation in vivo , 2006, Nature.

[126]  J. Millar,et al.  Cdc25: mechanisms of checkpoint inhibition and recovery. , 2006, Trends in cell biology.

[127]  Bernard Ducommun,et al.  The when and wheres of CDC25 phosphatases. , 2006, Current opinion in cell biology.

[128]  G. Zachos,et al.  Chk1 Requirement for High Global Rates of Replication Fork Progression during Normal Vertebrate S Phase , 2006, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[129]  A. Kumagai,et al.  TopBP1 Activates the ATR-ATRIP Complex , 2006, Cell.

[130]  Jiri Bartek,et al.  ATM- and cell cycle-dependent regulation of ATR in response to DNA double-strand breaks , 2006, Nature Cell Biology.

[131]  A. Matsuura,et al.  Dimerization of the ATRIP protein through the coiled-coil motif and its implication to the maintenance of stalled replication forks. , 2005, Molecular biology of the cell.

[132]  A. Carr,et al.  Identification and functional analysis of TopBP1 and its homologs. , 2005, DNA repair.

[133]  D. Cortez,et al.  ATRIP Oligomerization Is Required for ATR-dependent Checkpoint Signaling* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[134]  J. Myers,et al.  ATRIP binding to replication protein A-single-stranded DNA promotes ATR-ATRIP localization but is dispensable for Chk1 phosphorylation. , 2005, Molecular biology of the cell.

[135]  M. Pacek,et al.  Functional uncoupling of MCM helicase and DNA polymerase activities activates the ATR-dependent checkpoint. , 2005, Genes & development.

[136]  M. Lopes,et al.  Exo1 processes stalled replication forks and counteracts fork reversal in checkpoint-defective cells. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[137]  S. Elledge,et al.  Minichromosome maintenance proteins are direct targets of the ATM and ATR checkpoint kinases. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[138]  K. Marheineke,et al.  Control of Replication Origin Density and Firing Time in Xenopus Egg Extracts , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[139]  J. Gautier,et al.  ATR and ATM regulate the timing of DNA replication origin firing , 2004, Nature Cell Biology.

[140]  I. Hickson,et al.  Phosphorylation of the Bloom's Syndrome Helicase and Its Role in Recovery from S-Phase Arrest , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[141]  S. Elledge,et al.  Replication protein A-mediated recruitment and activation of Rad17 complexes , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[142]  B. Stillman,et al.  Biochemical Characterization of DNA Damage Checkpoint Complexes: Clamp Loader and Clamp Complexes with Specificity for 5′ Recessed DNA , 2003, PLoS biology.

[143]  S. Gasser,et al.  DNA polymerase stabilization at stalled replication forks requires Mec1 and the RecQ helicase Sgs1 , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[144]  Stephen J. Elledge,et al.  Sensing DNA Damage Through ATRIP Recognition of RPA-ssDNA Complexes , 2003, Science.

[145]  Judith A. Goodship,et al.  A splicing mutation affecting expression of ataxia–telangiectasia and Rad3–related protein (ATR) results in Seckel syndrome , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[146]  J. Bartek,et al.  Chk1 regulates the S phase checkpoint by coupling the physiological turnover and ionizing radiation-induced accelerated proteolysis of Cdc25A. , 2003, Cancer cell.

[147]  J. Hurwitz,et al.  Loading of the human 9-1-1 checkpoint complex onto DNA by the checkpoint clamp loader hRad17-replication factor C complex in vitro , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[148]  M. Kastan,et al.  DNA damage activates ATM through intermolecular autophosphorylation and dimer dissociation , 2003, Nature.

[149]  J. Gautier,et al.  An ATR- and Cdc7-dependent DNA damage checkpoint that inhibits initiation of DNA replication. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[150]  Hui Zhao,et al.  Disruption of the checkpoint kinase 1/cell division cycle 25A pathway abrogates ionizing radiation-induced S and G2 checkpoints , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[151]  M. Lopes,et al.  Fork Reversal and ssDNA Accumulation at Stalled Replication Forks Owing to Checkpoint Defects , 2002, Science.

[152]  T. Glover,et al.  ATR Regulates Fragile Site Stability Common fragile sites are normally stable in cultured , 2002 .

[153]  Jun Qin,et al.  ATR and ATRIP: Partners in Checkpoint Signaling , 2001, Science.

[154]  C. Newlon,et al.  The DNA replication checkpoint response stabilizes stalled replication forks , 2001, Nature.

[155]  J. Diffley,et al.  Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint , 2001, Nature.

[156]  D. Durocher,et al.  DNA-PK, ATM and ATR as sensors of DNA damage: variations on a theme? , 2001, Current opinion in cell biology.

[157]  A. Kumagai,et al.  Claspin, a novel protein required for the activation of Chk1 during a DNA replication checkpoint response in Xenopus egg extracts. , 2000, Molecular cell.

[158]  E. Fanning,et al.  Activation of the DNA replication checkpoint through RNA synthesis by primase. , 2000, Science.

[159]  N. Mailand,et al.  Rapid destruction of human Cdc25A in response to DNA damage. , 2000, Science.

[160]  A. Carr,et al.  Targeted disruption of the cell-cycle checkpoint gene ATR leads to early embryonic lethality in mice , 2000, Current Biology.

[161]  D. Baltimore,et al.  ATR disruption leads to chromosomal fragmentation and early embryonic lethality. , 2000, Genes & development.

[162]  G. Walker,et al.  The SOS response: recent insights into umuDC-dependent mutagenesis and DNA damage tolerance. , 2000, Annual review of genetics.

[163]  J. Diffley,et al.  A Mec1- and Rad53-dependent checkpoint controls late-firing origins of DNA replication , 1998, Nature.

[164]  S. Elledge,et al.  The DNA Replication and Damage Checkpoint Pathways Induce Transcription by Inhibition of the Crt1 Repressor , 1998, Cell.

[165]  R Rothstein,et al.  A suppressor of two essential checkpoint genes identifies a novel protein that negatively affects dNTP pools. , 1998, Molecular cell.

[166]  S. Schreiber,et al.  Overexpression of a kinase‐inactive ATR protein causes sensitivity to DNA‐damaging agents and defects in cell cycle checkpoints , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[167]  S. Elledge,et al.  Conservation of the Chk1 checkpoint pathway in mammals: linkage of DNA damage to Cdk regulation through Cdc25. , 1997, Science.

[168]  C. Peng,et al.  Mitotic and G2 checkpoint control: regulation of 14-3-3 protein binding by phosphorylation of Cdc25C on serine-216. , 1997, Science.

[169]  A. Carr,et al.  The Schizosaccharomyces pombe rad3 checkpoint gene. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[170]  S. Schreiber,et al.  cDNA cloning and gene mapping of a candidate human cell cycle checkpoint protein. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[171]  Mary Pilat,et al.  Variations on a Theme: A Comparison of a School-Age Child Care Curriculum in School and Non-School Settings. , 1993 .