An Automated Analysis of Intracortical Porosity in Human Femoral Bone Across Age

The matrix of human cortical bone is arranged around a network of vascular spaces (hereafter referred to as “pores”). Our aim was to investigate age‐related differences in human cortical porosity (total pore area divided by cortical bone area), pore size and number, and surface to volume ratios, while adjusting for sex, height, and weight. Ninety‐six specimens of entire transverse sections of human femoral diaphysis, from subjects aged 21–92 years, were examined. We used our established automated image acquisition and analysis system which measures pores from entire sections of multiple specimens of bone. Over 400,000 pores were recorded. Results showed a greater porosity in older bone (p < 0.01) but marked variation in porosity for any given age. The cohort median, of the specimen medians, of pore cross‐sectional area was 2050 μm2. Older specimens did not have more pores than younger specimens but had a greater proportion of larger pores (p < 0.05) and greater intraspecimen variation in pore size (p < 0.001). The pore surface to bone matrix volume ratio was a median 2.3 mm2/mm3. This varied more than 4‐fold between individuals but did not relate to age. No simple relationships were found between any of the measured parameters and either sex, height, or weight, even after adjustment for age. We conclude that the greater porosity in older specimens is due to greater pore size rather than a larger number of pores. Age, however, explains little of the inter‐individual variation in the parameters studied.

[1]  H. Frost,et al.  BONE REMODELLING DYNAMICS , 1964 .

[2]  J. Currey SOME EFFECTS OF AGEING IN HUMAN HAVERSIAN SYSTEMS. , 1964, Journal of anatomy.

[3]  P. J. Atkinson Quantitative Analysis of Osteoporosis in Cortical Bone , 1964, Nature.

[4]  B. Epker,et al.  AGING AND THE KINETICS OF HUMAN OSTEON FORMATION * , 1964, Journal of gerontology.

[5]  E. Kerley,et al.  The microscopic determination of age in human bone. , 1965, American journal of physical anthropology.

[6]  B. Epker,et al.  A histological study of remodeling at the periosteal, haversian canal, cortical endosteal, and trabecular endosteal surfaces in human rib , 1965, The Anatomical record.

[7]  P. J. Atkinson,et al.  CHANGES IN RESORPTION SPACES IN FEMORAL CORTICAL BONE WITH AGE. , 1965, The Journal of pathology and bacteriology.

[8]  H. Frost,et al.  Normal histological, tetracycline and dynamic parameters in human, mineralized bone sections. , 1966, Henry Ford Hospital medical journal.

[9]  J. Jowsey,et al.  Bone formation and resorption in normal human rib. A study of persons from 11 to 88 years of age. , 1967, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  J A Weatherell,et al.  Variation in the density of the femoral diaphysis with age. , 1967, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[11]  E. Korostoff,et al.  Haversian osteons: size, distribution, internal structure, and orientation. , 1974, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[12]  M Martens,et al.  Aging of bone tissue: mechanical properties. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[13]  D. Ubelaker,et al.  Revisions in the microscopic method of estimating age at death in human cortical bone. , 1978, American journal of physical anthropology.

[14]  R. Martin,et al.  Studies of skeletal remodeling in aging men. , 1980, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  J. Kragstrup,et al.  Osteon cross-sectional size in the iliac crest: variation in normals and patients with osteoporosis, hyperparathyroidism, acromegaly, hypothyroidism and treated epilepsia. , 2009, Acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica. Section A, Pathology.

[16]  D. Thompson,et al.  Estimation of age at death by tibial osteon remodeling in an autopsy series. , 1983, Forensic science international.

[17]  M. Kleerekoper,et al.  Relationships between surface, volume, and thickness of iliac trabecular bone in aging and in osteoporosis. Implications for the microanatomic and cellular mechanisms of bone loss. , 1983, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[18]  H. Frost Bone “mass” and the “mechanostat”: A proposal , 1987, The Anatomical record.

[19]  B. Lawrence Riggs,et al.  Osteoporosis : etiology, diagnosis, and management , 1988 .

[20]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Statistics with confidence: Confidence intervals and statistical guidelines . , 1990 .

[21]  D. G. Wastell,et al.  Statistics with confidence—Confidence intervals and statistical guidelines , 1991 .

[22]  H. Orimo,et al.  [Involutional osteoporosis]. , 1991, Nihon Ronen Igakkai zasshi. Japanese journal of geriatrics.

[23]  J. Kragstrup,et al.  A reconstruction of the remodelling cycle in normal human cortical iliac bone. , 1991, Bone and mineral.

[24]  M. Kleerekoper,et al.  Structural and geometric changes in iliac bone: Relationship to normal aging and osteoporosis , 1991, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[25]  R. Martin On the significance of remodeling space and activation rate changes in bone remodeling. , 1991, Bone.

[26]  J J Anderson,et al.  Effects of weight and body mass index on bone mineral density in men and women: The framingham study , 1993, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[27]  J A McGeough,et al.  Age-related changes in the tensile properties of cortical bone. The relative importance of changes in porosity, mineralization, and microstructure. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[28]  L. Mosekilde,et al.  Age- and sex-related changes in iliac cortical bone mass and remodeling. , 1993, Bone.

[29]  C Milgrom,et al.  Aging and matrix microdamage accumulation in human compact bone. , 1995, Bone.

[30]  V. Marchand,et al.  [Epidemiology of fractures]. , 1995, Soins. Pediatrie, puericulture.

[31]  C. Thomas,et al.  A morphometric study of the cortex of the human femur from early childhood to advanced old age. , 1995, Forensic science international.

[32]  C. Thomas,et al.  Age trends in remodeling of the femoral midshaft differ between the sexes. , 1997, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[33]  M. Stein,et al.  Risk factors for secondary hyperparathyroidism in a nursing home population , 1996, Clinical endocrinology.

[34]  J G Clement,et al.  Age‐related changes in cortical porosity of the midshaft of the human femur , 1997, Journal of anatomy.

[35]  H. Frost,et al.  On Our Age‐Related Bone Loss: Insights from a New Paradigm , 1997, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[36]  J G Clement,et al.  Bone size and mechanics at the femoral diaphysis across age and sex. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[37]  A. M. Parfitt,et al.  Skeletal Heterogeneity and the Purposes of Bone Remodeling: Implications for the Understanding of Osteoporosis , 2001 .