Intra‐ and Intersexual Selection for Multiple Traits in the Peacock (Pavo cristatus)

Animal communication involves a multitude of signals ranging from morphological to behavioural traits. In spite of the diversity of traits used in animal signalling, most studies of sexual selection have focused on single male traits. Moreover, the two forces of sexual selection (male–male competition and female preference) may target different traits and favour the diversification of male signalling. Still, little is known on the combined effects of intra- and intersexual selection on the evolution of multiple signals. The peacock is often cited as one of the best examples of the strength of sexual selection in producing exaggerated traits. Here, we investigated traits under intra- and intersexual selection in a population of free-ranging common peafowl. Peacocks with longer trains and tarsi were more likely to establish a display territory in a central position within the lek and had a higher number of intrusions and agonistic interactions. These traits appeared therefore to be under intrasexual selection. Female selection was assessed as the number of copulations. Mating success was positively correlated with behavioural traits (display activity) and with train ornamentation (number and density of ocelli) suggesting that females use multiple cues during mate selection. Therefore, intraand intersexual selection seem to operate on different sets of traits. Overall, our results stress the role of multiple receivers on the evolution of multiple signals.

[1]  S. Andersson Sexual selection and cues for female choice in leks of Jackson's widowbird Euplectes jacksoni , 1989, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[2]  M. Petrie,et al.  Improved growth and survival of offspring of peacocks with more elaborate trains , 1994, Nature.

[3]  W. Rice,et al.  PERSPECTIVE: CHASE‐AWAY SEXUAL SELECTION: ANTAGONISTIC SEDUCTION VERSUS RESISTANCE , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[4]  M. Lawes,et al.  Multiple Receivers, Multiple Ornaments, and a Trade‐off between Agonistic and Epigamic Signaling in a Widowbird , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[5]  R. B. Payne,et al.  Sexual Selection, Lek and Arena Behavior and Sexual Size Dimorphism in Birds , 1984 .

[6]  Adrian L. R. Thomas,et al.  Aerodynamics and the evolution of long tails in birds , 1993, Nature.

[7]  J. Höglund,et al.  Sexual selection in a monomorphic lek-breeding bird: correlates of male mating success in the great snipe Gallinago media , 1987, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[8]  B. Sheldon,et al.  Differential allocation: tests, mechanisms and implications. , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[9]  M. Petrie,et al.  Experimental and natural changes in the peacock's (Pavo cristatus) train can affect mating success , 1994, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[10]  A. Lelliott,et al.  The social organization of feral peafowl , 1984, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  W. Hamilton,et al.  Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? , 1982, Science.

[12]  Hamid Saadati,et al.  Evolution of Leks , 1998 .

[13]  C. Rowe Receiver psychology and the evolution of multicomponent signals , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[14]  B. Hatchwell,et al.  An experimental study of male adornment in the scarlet-tufted malachite sunbird: II. The role of the elongated tail in mate choice and experimental evidence for a handicap , 1992, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[15]  Rufus A. Johnstone,et al.  Honest advertisement of multiple qualities using multiple signals , 1995 .

[16]  S. Yasmin,et al.  Correlates of mating success in Indian Peafowl , 1996 .

[17]  M. Petrie,et al.  Peahens prefer peacocks with elaborate trains , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[18]  Adrian L. R. Thomas,et al.  The aerodynamic and mechanical effects of elongated tails in the scarlet-tufted malachite sunbird: measuring the cost of a handicap , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[19]  J. Bradbury,et al.  The energetic cost of display in male sage grouse , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[20]  C. Mateos,et al.  Sexual selection in the ring-necked pheasant: a review , 1998 .

[21]  A. Møller,et al.  Why have birds got multiple sexual ornaments? , 1993, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[22]  U. Savalli Tail length affects territory ownership in the yellow-shouldered widowbird , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  M. Ryan Sexual selection, sensory systems and sensory exploitation. , 1990 .

[24]  K. Marchetti The evolution of multiple male traits in the yellow-browed leaf warbler , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[25]  M. Petrie,et al.  Condition dependence, multiple sexual signals, and immunocompetence in peacocks , 2002 .

[26]  S. J. Arnold,et al.  ON THE MEASUREMENT OF NATURAL AND SEXUAL SELECTION: THEORY , 1984, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[27]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Effects of experimental manipulation of male secondary sex characters on female mate preference in red jungle fowl , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[28]  B. Hatchwell,et al.  An experimental study of male adornment in the scarlet-tufted malachite sunbird: I. The role of pectoral tufts in territorial defence , 1992, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[29]  M. Lawes,et al.  SEXUAL SELECTION OF MULTIPLE HANDICAPS IN THE RED‐COLLARED WIDOWBIRD: FEMALE CHOICE OF TAIL LENGTH BUT NOT CAROTENOID DISPLAY , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[30]  S. Rohwer The Evolution of Reliable and Unreliable Badges of Fighting Ability , 1982 .

[31]  J. Swaddle Limits to length asymmetry detection in starlings: implications for biological signalling , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  S. J. Arnold,et al.  ON THE MEASUREMENT OF NATURAL AND SEXUAL SELECTION: APPLICATIONS , 1984, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[33]  Viability costs of male tail ornaments in a swallow , 1989 .