Indicators of hemeroby for the monitoring of landscapes in Germany

The article discusses the concepts of “closeness to nature” and “hemeroby”, and outlines a method to establish two indicators of hemeroby. Until now Germany's national land use monitoring systems have lacked an indicator to capture the naturalness respectively hemeroby of the landscape. Based on digital spatial data on land use (DLM-DE) and the mapping of potential natural vegetation, these indicators have now been estimated for the whole of Germany and illustrated cartographically. The indicators have been integrated into a land use monitoring system (IOER-Monitor). A hemeroby index that considers all hemeroby classes of a reference area (e.g. administrative unit and regular grid cell) is presented as well as an indicator named “Proportion of certain natural areas”. The results on hemeroby of several time-cuts can be used to estimate the cumulative impact of land use changes on the environmental status.

[1]  Dirk Hänsgen,et al.  Nationalatlas Bundesrepublik Deutschland , 2000 .

[2]  E. Szerencsits,et al.  Evaluating the ecological sustainability of Austrian agricultural landscapes—the SINUS approach , 2004 .

[3]  U. Tappeiner,et al.  Biodiversity indicators for sustainability monitoring at municipality level: An example of implementation in an alpine region , 2008 .

[4]  J. M. Hellawell,et al.  Development of a rationale for monitoring , 1991 .

[5]  S. Zerbe,et al.  Changes in landscape naturalness derived from a historical land register—a case study from NE Germany , 2009, Landscape Ecology.

[6]  Roman Lenz,et al.  Environmental indices systems analysis approach , 1999 .

[7]  W. Wende,et al.  Requirements of the SEA Directive and the German Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan , 2004 .

[8]  Erich Tasser,et al.  Distance to nature—A new biodiversity relevant environmental indicator set at the landscape level , 2012 .

[9]  Herbert Sukopp,et al.  Der Einfluss des Menschen auf die Vegetation , 1969, Vegetatio.

[10]  H. Leser,et al.  Handbuch und Kartieranleitung, Geoökologische Karte 1:25,000 (KA GÖK 25) , 1988 .

[11]  Frank Brentrup,et al.  Life Cycle Impact assessment of land use based on the hemeroby concept , 2002 .

[12]  M. Bossard,et al.  CORINE land cover technical guide - Addendum 2000 , 2000 .

[13]  S. Arnold,et al.  DIGITAL LANDSCAPE MODEL DLM-DE – DERIVING LAND COVER INFORMATION BY INTEGRATION OF TOPOGRAPHIC REFERENCE DATA WITH REMOTE SENSING DATA , 2009 .

[14]  Hubert Gulinck,et al.  Evaluating change in agricultural landscape pattern between 1980 and 2000 in the Loess hilly region of Ansai County, China , 2006 .

[15]  G. Fry,et al.  Relationships between visual landscape preferences and map-based indicators of landscape structure , 2006 .

[16]  A. Machado,et al.  An index of naturalness , 2004 .

[18]  Randall Davenport,et al.  Infrastructure for Spatial Information , 2014 .

[19]  H. Haberl,et al.  Linking pattern and process in cultural landscapes. An empirical study based on spatially explicit indicators , 2004 .

[20]  Franz Makeschin,et al.  A contribution towards a transfer of the ecosystem service concept to landscape planning using landscape metrics , 2012 .