The Changing Landscape of Transportation Decision Making

This paper examines the changes taking place in the way transportation policy and investment decisions are made. To provide an understanding of these changes, they are placed in the larger context of major trends in public-sector decision making: devolution, fragmentation, and privatization. The changes taking place in the transport sector are viewed as consistent with larger trends. The changes pose particular challenges in transportation because of its unique characteristics, and they have contributed to four problems: (a) preserving and enhancing system network benefits, (b) avoiding inefficient decisions, (c) solving transportation's externalities, and (d) ensuring accountability. The Alameda Corridor is used as an example of managing the new decision-making landscape. The paper closes with thoughts on improving the transportation decision-making process.

[1]  Donald F. Kettl,et al.  The Transformation of Governance: Public Administration for Twenty-First Century America , 2002 .

[2]  Elaine C. Kamarck.  The End of Government...As We Know It: Making Public Policy Work , 2007 .

[3]  Richard C. Feiock,et al.  Metropolitan Governance and Institutional Collective Action , 2009 .

[4]  Joseph R. Morris,et al.  The Fuel Tax and Alternatives for Transportation Funding , 2006 .

[5]  David Y. Miller.  The Regional Governing of Metropolitan America , 2002 .

[6]  James A. Dunn,et al.  Driving Forces: The Automobile, Its Enemies, and the Politics of Mobility , 1998 .

[7]  D. Kettl.  The Transformation of Governance: Globalization, Devolution, and the Role of Government , 2000 .

[8]  B. Flyvbjerg,et al.  Megaprojects and Risk , 2003 .

[9]  John W Fischer,et al.  Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act — A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU or SAFETEA): Selected Major Provisions , 2005 .

[10]  Paul G. Lewis.  Shaping Suburbia: How Political Institutions Organize Urban Development , 1996 .

[11]  Alan Altshuler,et al.  THE URBAN TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM. POLITICS AND POLICY INNOVATION , 1980 .

[12]  John D. Donahue,et al.  Market-Based Governance: Supply Side, Demand Side, Upside, and Downside , 2002 .

[13]  Juliet F. Gainsborough.  To Devolve or Not To Devolve? Welfare Reform in the States , 2003 .

[14]  Edward Weiner,et al.  URBAN TRANSPORTATION PLANNING IN THE UNITED STATES: AN HISTORICAL OVERVIEW , 1986 .

[15]  D. Hamilton,et al.  Exploring the Horizontal and Vertical Dimensions of the Governing of Metropolitan Regions , 2004 .

[16]  L. Schäfer.  The Θ-Region , 1999 .

[17]  David Rusk,et al.  Cities without Suburbs , 1993 .

[18]  K Stanilov,et al.  The reluctant metropolis: The politics of urban growth in Los Angeles , 2002 .

[19]  A. Sbragia.  Debt Wish: Entrepreneurial Cities, U.S. Federalism, and Economic Development , 1996 .

[20]  M. Wachs,et al.  A QUIET REVOLUTION IN TRANSPORTATION FINANCE: THE RISE OF LOCAL OPTION TRANSPORTATION TAXES , 2003 .

[21]  Alan Altshuler,et al.  Mega-Projects: The Changing Politics of Urban Public Investment , 2003 .

[22]  Kristen Monaco,et al.  A study of drayage at the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach , 2005 .

[23]  R. Voith.  Do Suburbs Need Cities , 1998 .

[24]  Robert S Kirk.  Federal-Aid Highway Program: "Donor-Donee" State Issues , 2004 .

[25]  Peter Dreier,et al.  Up Against The Sprawl: Public Policy And The Making Of Southern California , 2004 .

[26]  Charles M. Tiebout.  A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures , 1956, Journal of Political Economy.

[27]  L. Salamon,et al.  The tools of government : a guide to the new governance , 2002 .

[28]  S. Smith,et al.  Economic aspects of decentralized government: structure, functions and finance , 1991 .

[29]  Jerry Paytas.  Does Governance Matter? The Dynamics of Metropolitan Governance and Competitiveness , 2001 .

[30]  M. Wachs.  THE POLITICAL CONTEXT OF TRANSPORTATION POLICY. , 1995 .