Ubiquitous Piezoelectric Sensor Network (UPSN)-Based Concrete Curing Monitoring for u-Construction

Recently, there has been increasing demand for high-rise buildings or wide-span bridges. These structures are constructed with a mount of mass concrete. However, the concrete might be susceptible to brittle fracture if the curing process is inadequate. Therefore, to prevent this drawback, it is essential to predict the strength development of concrete during the curing process. In addition, real-time monitoring of the curing strength is important for reducing the construction time and cost because it can determine the appropriate curing time to achieve sufficient strength to progress to the next phase safely. The in-situ strength of concrete structures can be determined with a high precision by performing the strength testing and/or material analysis on core samples removed from the structure (Irie et al., 2008). However, this method might destroy the concrete structure. Therefore, a range of methods based on the thermal, acoustical, electrical, magnetic, optical, radiographic, and mechanical properties of the test materials have been developed to monitor the strength development without damaging the host structures (ACI Committee 228, 2003; Lamind and Pielert, 2006; Metha and Monterio, 2005). These methods typically measure certain properties of concrete from which the strength and/or elastic constants can be estimated. Among these techniques, several methods using a Schmidt hammer or an integrated temperature have been normally used. However, these are unsuitable for use at construction sites because they do not allow real-time monitoring of the curing process of concrete structures at inaccessible places. The recent advent of smart materials, particularly piezoelectric materials, can provide a solution for the real-time monitoring for strength development. Electromechanical impedance techniques that employ piezoelectric materials have emerged as a potential tool for the implementation of a built-in monitoring system for civil infrastructures (Park G. et al., 2000, 2003; Park S. et al. 2005, 2006, 2011). This technique utilizes high-frequency structural excitation, which is typically > 20 kHz from surface-bonded PZT (Lead-ZirconateTitanate) patches, to sensitively monitor the changes in the mechanical impedance of the test structures. Furthermore, the recent advances in online monitoring, including actuation and sensing, on-board computing, and radio-frequency (RF) telemetry, have improved the

[1]  C. Liang,et al.  Electro-mechanical impedance modeling of active material systems , 1996 .

[2]  Chung Bang Yun,et al.  Automated Impedance-based Structural Health Monitoring Incorporating Effective Frequency Shift for Compensating Temperature Effects , 2009 .

[3]  Sun-Kyu Park,et al.  Impedance-based wireless debonding condition monitoring of CFRP laminated concrete structures , 2011 .

[4]  C. Yun,et al.  Health monitoring of steel structures using impedance of thickness modes at PZT patches , 2005 .

[5]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Development of an extremely compact impedance-based wireless sensing device , 2008 .

[6]  Suresh Bhalla,et al.  Influence of structure-actuator interactions and temperature on piezoelectric mechatronic signatures for NDE , 2003, Other Conferences.

[7]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  Overview of Piezoelectric Impedance-Based Health Monitoring and Path Forward , 2003 .

[8]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Piezoelectric Active Sensor Self-Diagnostics Using Electrical Admittance Measurements , 2006 .

[9]  Gyuhae Park,et al.  Development of an impedance-based wireless sensor node for structural health monitoring , 2007 .

[10]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  Active self-sensing scheme development for structural health monitoring , 2006 .

[11]  Y. Akaizawa,et al.  Non-destructive testing method , 1976 .

[12]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  IMPEDANCE-BASED HEALTH MONITORING OF CIVIL STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS , 2000 .

[13]  Chung Bang Yun,et al.  Multiple Crack Detection of Concrete Structures Using Impedance-based Structural Health Monitoring Techniques , 2006 .

[14]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  DEVELOPING AN AUTONOMOUS ON-ORBIT IMPEDANCE-BASED SHM SYSTEM FOR THERMAL PROTECTION SYSTEMS , 2006 .

[15]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Wireless impedance device for electromechanical impedance sensing and low-frequency vibration data acquisition , 2009, Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[16]  Ch Best,et al.  Significance of Tests and Properties of Concrete and Concrete-Making Materials , 1978 .

[17]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  A low-power wireless sensing device for remote inspection of bolted joints , 2009 .

[18]  P. K. Mehta,et al.  Concrete: Microstructure, Properties, and Materials , 2005 .

[19]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  Design of a wireless active sensing unit for structural health monitoring , 2004, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[20]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  A mobile-agent-based wireless sensing network for structural monitoring applications , 2009 .

[21]  Seunghee Park,et al.  Wireless impedance sensor nodes for functions of structural damage identification and sensor self-diagnosis , 2009 .

[22]  J. Prasad,et al.  Effect of GGBFS on time dependent compressive strength of concrete , 2010 .