Prognostic value of Rb-82 positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging in coronary artery bypass patients.

AIMS We sought to determine the prognostic value of positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) in patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. PET MPI has recently been shown to provide incremental risk stratification for patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD), but the prognostic utility of PET MPI in CABG patients has not been well studied. METHODS AND RESULTS A multi-centre PET registry of 7061 patients who underwent Rb-82 PET MPI from four participating centres was screened. Nine hundred and fifty-three CABG patients were identified and their images were analysed. Outcomes of all-cause mortality and cardiac death were collected. With a mean follow-up of 2.4 ± 1.4 years, 128 (13.4%) all-cause deaths and 44 (4.6%) cardiac deaths were observed. Multivariable analyses, adjusted for clinical variables, demonstrated that the summed stress score (SSS) was a significant independent predictor of both all-cause mortality [HR: 1.60 (per 1 category increase in SSS); 95% CI: 1.34-1.92; P < 0.001] and cardiac death (HR: 1.80; 95% CI: 1.33, 2.44; P < 0.001). The receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curves showed that the addition of SSS increased the area under the curve (AUC) from 0.645 to 0.693 (P = 0.014) for all-cause mortality, and from 0.612 to 0.704 (P = 0.027) for cardiac death. SSS also improved the net reclassification improvement (NRI) for all-cause mortality (category-free NRI = 0.422; 95% CI: 0.240-0.603; P < 0.001) and cardiac death (category-free NRI = 0.552; 95% CI: 0.268-0.836; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS PET MPI provides independent and incremental prognostic value to clinical variables in predicting all-cause mortality and cardiac death in CABG patients.

[1]  A. Gitt,et al.  NEWLY DIAGNOSED DIABETES AND PREDIABETES IN PATIENTS AFTER ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION PREDICTS ADVERSE OUTCOMES DURING A THREE-YEAR FOLLOW-UP: RESULTS OF THE SWEETHEART REGISTRY , 2013 .

[2]  J. Afilalo,et al.  Incremental Value of the Preoperative Echocardiogram to Predict Mortality and Major Morbidity in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery , 2013, Circulation.

[3]  M. Pencina,et al.  Prognostic value of stress myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography: results from a multicenter observational registry. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  M. Trevisan,et al.  Evaluating the Prognostic Value of Positron‐Emission Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Using Automated Software to Calculate Perfusion Defect Size , 2012, Clinical cardiology.

[5]  G. Stone,et al.  Outcomes of patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting and acute coronary syndromes: analysis from the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) trial. , 2012, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[6]  S. Garcia,et al.  Utility of nuclear stress imaging for detecting coronary artery bypass graft disease , 2012, BMC Cardiovascular Disorders.

[7]  Ran Klein,et al.  Does quantification of myocardial flow reserve using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography facilitate detection of multivessel coronary artery disease? , 2012, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[8]  D. Berman,et al.  Prognostic assessment of coronary artery bypass patients with 64-slice computed tomography angiography: anatomical information is incremental to clinical risk prediction. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  M. Pencina,et al.  Improved Cardiac Risk Assessment With Noninvasive Measures of Coronary Flow Reserve , 2011, Circulation.

[10]  B. Chow,et al.  Prognostic value of CT angiography in coronary bypass patients. , 2011, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[11]  Oliver Gaemperli,et al.  Long-term prognostic value of 13N-ammonia myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography added value of coronary flow reserve. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  B. Chow,et al.  Prognostic value of treadmill exercise and dobutamine stress positron emission tomography. , 2009, The Canadian journal of cardiology.

[13]  R. Kwong,et al.  Incremental prognostic value of gated Rb-82 positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging over clinical variables and rest LVEF. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[14]  S. Solomon,et al.  Patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting have a poor outcome after myocardial infarction: an analysis of the VALsartan in acute myocardial iNfarcTion trial (VALIANT). , 2009, European heart journal.

[15]  Hans L Hillege,et al.  Comparison Between the Prognostic Value of Left Ventricular Function and Myocardial Perfusion Reserve in Patients with Ischemic Heart Disease , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[16]  G. Heller,et al.  Independent and incremental prognostic value of left ventricular ejection fraction determined by stress gated rubidium 82 PET imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease , 2008, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[17]  M. Pencina,et al.  Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: From area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[18]  Richard Speare,et al.  Outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft surgery , 2006, Vascular health and risk management.

[19]  Keiichiro Yoshinaga,et al.  What is the prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography? , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  D. Mark,et al.  A new anatomic score for prognosis after cardiac catheterization in patients with previous bypass surgery. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  B. Chow,et al.  Prognostic significance of dipyridamole-induced ST depression in patients with normal 82Rb PET myocardial perfusion imaging. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[22]  J. Ornato,et al.  ACC/AHA 2004 guideline update for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1999 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery). , 2004, Circulation.

[23]  D. Ross,et al.  Preoperative cardiovascular risk factor control in elective coronary artery bypass graft patients: a failure of present management. , 2002, The Canadian journal of cardiology.

[24]  B. Zaret,et al.  Contributions of nuclear cardiology to diagnosis and prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease. , 2000, Circulation.

[25]  D. Berman,et al.  Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography for the prediction of cardiac death: differential stratification for risk of cardiac death and myocardial infarction. , 1998, Circulation.

[26]  M. Lauer,et al.  Incremental value of rubidium-82 positron emission tomography for prognostic assessment of known or suspected coronary artery disease. , 1997, The American journal of cardiology.

[27]  M. Winniford,et al.  Special Articles: 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2012, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[28]  Janet S. Wright,et al.  2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2012, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.