Probabilistic Multiple-Bias Modeling Applied to the Canadian Data From the Interphone Study of Mobile Phone Use and Risk of Glioma, Meningioma, Acoustic Neuroma, and Parotid Gland Tumors

We undertook a re-analysis of the Canadian data from the 13-country case-control Interphone Study (2001-2004), in which researchers evaluated the associations of mobile phone use with the risks of brain, acoustic neuroma, and parotid gland tumors. In the main publication of the multinational Interphone Study, investigators concluded that biases and errors prevented a causal interpretation. We applied a probabilistic multiple-bias model to address possible biases simultaneously, using validation data from billing records and nonparticipant questionnaires as information on recall error and selective participation. In our modeling, we sought to adjust for these sources of uncertainty and to facilitate interpretation. For glioma, when comparing those in the highest quartile of use (>558 lifetime hours) to those who were not regular users, the odds ratio was 2.0 (95% confidence interval: 1.2, 3.4). After adjustment for selection and recall biases, the odds ratio was 2.2 (95% limits: 1.3, 4.1). There was little evidence of an increase in the risk of meningioma, acoustic neuroma, or parotid gland tumors in relation to mobile phone use. Adjustments for selection and recall biases did not materially affect interpretation in our results from Canadian data.

[1]  Lennart Hardell,et al.  Mobile phone and cordless phone use and the risk for glioma - Analysis of pooled case-control studies in Sweden, 1997-2003 and 2007-2009. , 2015, Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology.

[2]  Richard F MacLehose,et al.  Good practices for quantitative bias analysis. , 2014, International journal of epidemiology.

[3]  Lennart Hardell,et al.  Using the Hill viewpoints from 1965 for evaluating strengths of evidence of the risk for brain tumors associated with use of mobile and cordless phones1) , 2013, Reviews on environmental health.

[4]  L. S. Schmidt,et al.  Mobile phone use and brain tumors in children and adolescents: a multicenter case-control study. , 2012, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[5]  Isabelle Lagroye,et al.  Systematic review of wireless phone use and brain cancer and other head tumors , 2012, Bioelectromagnetics.

[6]  J. Olsen,et al.  Use of mobile phones and risk of brain tumours: update of Danish cohort study , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  M. Vrijheid,et al.  Acoustic neuroma risk in relation to mobile telephone use: results of the INTERPHONE international case-control study. , 2011, Cancer epidemiology.

[8]  K. Straif,et al.  Carcinogenicity of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. , 2011, The Lancet. Oncology.

[9]  M. Vrijheid,et al.  Estimation of RF energy absorbed in the brain from mobile phones in the Interphone Study , 2011, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[10]  E Cardis,et al.  Risk of brain tumours in relation to estimated RF dose from mobile phones: results from five Interphone countries , 2011, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[11]  G. Bedogni Applying Quantitative Bias Analysis to Epidemiologic Data , 2011 .

[12]  Elisabeth Cardis,et al.  Brain tumour risk in relation to mobile telephone use: results of the INTERPHONE international case-control study. , 2010, International journal of epidemiology.

[13]  K. Jöckel,et al.  Mobile Phone Use and Risk of Uveal Melanoma: Results of the Risk Factors for Uveal Melanoma Case-Control Study , 2009, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[14]  Michael Kundi,et al.  The Controversy about a Possible Relationship between Mobile Phone Use and Cancer , 2008, Environmental health perspectives.

[15]  K. H. Mild,et al.  Methodological Aspects of Epidemiological Studies on the Use of Mobile Phones and their Association with Brain Tumors , 2008 .

[16]  Susanna Lagorio,et al.  Recall bias in the assessment of exposure to mobile phones , 2008, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[17]  Naohito Yamaguchi,et al.  The INTERPHONE study: design, epidemiological methods, and description of the study population , 2007, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[18]  Daniel Krewski,et al.  The effects of recall errors and of selection bias in epidemiologic studies of mobile phone use and cancer risk , 2006, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[19]  E Cardis,et al.  Validation of short term recall of mobile phone use for the Interphone study , 2006, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[20]  Maria Blettner,et al.  Assessment of radiofrequency exposure from cellular telephone daily use in an epidemiological study: German Validation study of the international case–control study of cancers of the brain—INTERPHONE-Study , 2005, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[21]  Anssi Auvinen,et al.  Selection bias due to differential participation in a case-control study of mobile phone use and brain tumors. , 2005, Annals of epidemiology.

[22]  Sander Greenland,et al.  Multiple‐bias modelling for analysis of observational data , 2005 .

[23]  S. Hankinson,et al.  Analysis of Selection Bias in a Case‐Control Study of Renal Adenocarcinoma , 1990, Epidemiology.

[24]  A. B. Hill The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation? , 1965, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[25]  A. B. Hill,et al.  "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" (1965), by Austin Bradford Hill , 2017 .

[26]  Sander Greenland,et al.  Bias Analysis , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[27]  M. Vrijheid,et al.  Quantifying the impact of selection bias caused by nonparticipation in a case-control study of mobile phone use. , 2009, Annals of epidemiology.

[28]  M. Gapany Mobile Phone Use and Risk of Parotid Gland Tumor , 2007 .