Improving rational thermal comfort prediction by using subpopulation characteristics: A case study at Hermitage Amsterdam

ABSTRACT This study aims to improve the prediction accuracy of the rational standard thermal comfort model, known as the Predicted Mean Vote (PMV) model, by (1) calibrating one of its input variables “metabolic rate,” and (2) extending it by explicitly incorporating the variable running mean outdoor temperature (RMOT) that relates to adaptive thermal comfort. The analysis was performed with survey data (n = 1121) and climate measurements of the indoor and outdoor environment from a one year-long case study undertaken at Hermitage Amsterdam museum in the Netherlands. The PMVs were calculated for 35 survey days using (1) an a priori assumed metabolic rate, (2) a calibrated metabolic rate found by fitting the PMVs to the thermal sensation votes (TSVs) of each respondent using an optimization routine, and (3) extending the PMV model by including the RMOT. The results show that the calibrated metabolic rate is estimated to be 1.5 Met for this case study that was predominantly visited by elderly females. However, significant differences in metabolic rates have been revealed between adults and elderly showing the importance of differentiating between subpopulations. Hence, the standard tabular values, which only differentiate between various activities, may be oversimplified for many cases. Moreover, extending the PMV model with the RMOT substantially improves the thermal sensation prediction, but thermal sensation toward extreme cool and warm sensations remains partly underestimated.

[1]  P. Fanger,et al.  Extension of the PMV model to non-air-conditioned buildings in warm climates , 2002 .

[2]  Gail Brager,et al.  The adaptive model of thermal comfort and energy conservation in the built environment. , 2001 .

[3]  J J Cunningham,et al.  A reanalysis of the factors influencing basal metabolic rate in normal adults. , 1980, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[4]  P. O. Fanger,et al.  Thermal comfort: analysis and applications in environmental engineering, , 1972 .

[5]  R. de Dear,et al.  The adaptive model of thermal comfort and energy conservation in the built environment , 2001, International journal of biometeorology.

[6]  Y Zhu,et al.  Progress in thermal comfort research over the last twenty years. , 2013, Indoor air.

[7]  J. van Hoof Forty years of Fanger's model of thermal comfort: comfort for all? , 2008, Indoor air.

[8]  R. de Dear,et al.  Adaptive temperature limits: A new guideline in The Netherlands: A new approach for the assessment of building performance with respect to thermal indoor climate☆ , 2006 .

[9]  I. W. Molenaar,et al.  Statistics In The Social And Behavioral Sciences , 1985 .

[10]  Wouter D. van Marken Lichtenbelt,et al.  Energy consumption in buildings and female thermal demand , 2015 .

[11]  Bjarne W. Olesen,et al.  People's clothing behaviour according to external weather and indoor environment , 2007 .

[12]  F. G. Benedict,et al.  A Biometric Study of Human Basal Metabolism. , 1918, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Marcel Schweiker,et al.  A framework for an adaptive thermal heat balance model (ATHB) , 2015 .

[14]  Michael A. Humphreys,et al.  ADAPTIVE THERMAL COMFORT AND SUSTAINABLE THERMAL STANDARDS FOR BUILDINGS , 2002 .

[15]  Wouter D. van Marken Lichtenbelt,et al.  Influence of thermophysiology on thermal behavior: the essentials of categorization , 2014, Physiology & Behavior.

[16]  H C Bazett,et al.  A PRACTICAL SYSTEM OF UNITS FOR THE DESCRIPTION OF THE HEAT EXCHANGE OF MAN WITH HIS ENVIRONMENT. , 1941, Science.

[17]  A. K. Mishra,et al.  Development of thermal discernment among visitors: Results from a field study in the Hermitage Amsterdam , 2016 .

[18]  R.P. Kramer,et al.  The importance of integrally simulating the building, HVAC and control systems, and occupants’ impact for energy predictions of buildings including temperature and humidity control: validated case study museum Hermitage Amsterdam , 2017 .

[19]  Gail Brager,et al.  Developing an adaptive model of thermal comfort and preference , 1998 .

[20]  Ingvar Holmér,et al.  Personal factors in thermal comfort assessment: clothing properties and metabolic heat production , 2002 .

[21]  A. Roza,et al.  The Harris Benedict equation reevaluated: resting energy requirements and the body cell mass. , 1984, The American journal of clinical nutrition.