Survey of the sevoflurane sedation status in one provincial dental clinic center for the disabled

Background Sevoflurane sedation in pediatric and disabled patients has the advantage of faster induction and recovery compared to general anesthesia, as well as minimum influence on the respiratory and cardiovascular functions, and airway protective reflexes. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of sevoflurane sedation used in dental treatment at one provincial dental clinic center for the disabled. Methods We investigated patients' gender, age, reasons for undergoing sedation, medication history prior to treatment, duration of anesthesia, treatment length, type of treatment, and yearly patterns, for 387 cases of dental treatment performed using sevoflurane sedation from January 2013 to October 2016. Results We analyzed 387 cases (215 male patients, 172 female patients). Male patients aged 20 year or older accounted for 39.0% of all patients, marking the highest proportion. Patient's lack of cooperation was the most common reason for performing dental sedation. Prosthetic treatment was the most frequently practiced, accounting for 174 treatment cases. The mean lengths of the entire treatment and of the dental procedure were 55.2 min and 39.8 min, respectively. Conclusions Sevoflurane sedation has the advantage of fast anesthesia induction and recovery compared to general anesthesia; therefore, it can be used efficiently to induce anesthesia in pediatric and disabled patients during short dental procedures, enabling stable treatment of these patients.

[1]  Guideline on Use of Anesthesia Personnel in the Administration of Office-based Deep Sedation/General Anesthesia to the Pediatric Dental Patient. , 2016, Pediatric dentistry.

[2]  T. Shin,et al.  Deep sedation with sevoflurane inhalation via a nasal hood for brief dental procedures in pediatric patients. , 2013, Pediatric emergency care.

[3]  T. Shin,et al.  Deep sedation with sevoflurane insufflated via a nasal cannula in uncooperative child undergoing the repair of dental injury. , 2013, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[4]  Seungoh Kim A SURVEY OF GENERAL ANESTHESIA, SEVOFLURANE SEDATION AND INTRAVENOUS SEDATION IN CHUNGNAM DENTAL CLINIC FOR THE DISABLED , 2013 .

[5]  T. Shin,et al.  Clinico-statistical Analysis of Cooperation and Anesthetic Induction Method of Dental Patients with Special Needs , 2009 .

[6]  J. Boldt,et al.  Short-term sevoflurane sedation using the Anaesthetic Conserving Device after cardiothoracic surgery , 2008, Intensive Care Medicine.

[7]  Guillermo E. Chacon,et al.  Case report: autotransplantation for a missing permanent maxillary incisor. , 2008, Pediatric dentistry.

[8]  Naoyuki Hirata,et al.  Differential Effects of Propofol and Sevoflurane on Heart Rate Variability , 2003, Anesthesiology.

[9]  M. Hosey UK National Clinical Guidelines in Paediatric Dentistry. Managing anxious children: the use of conscious sedation in paediatric dentistry. , 2002, International journal of paediatric dentistry.

[10]  M. Hosey UK National Clinical Guidelines in Paediatric Dentistry. Managing anxious children: the use of conscious sedation in paediatric dentistry. , 2002, International journal of paediatric dentistry.

[11]  M. Gold,et al.  Which is most pungent: isoflurane, sevoflurane or desflurane? , 2000, British journal of anaesthesia.

[12]  Jin-Ho Kim,et al.  A Study on the Treatment of Dentally Handicapped Patients under Outpatient General Anesthesia , 1997 .

[13]  R. M. Jones,et al.  Desflurane and sevoflurane: inhalation anaesthetics for this decade? , 1990, British journal of anaesthesia.