The comparator theory fails to account for the selective role of within-compound associations in cue-selection effects.

In a human causal learning experiment, we investigated cue selection effects to test the comparator theory (Denniston, Savastano, & Miller, 2001; Miller & Matzel, 1988). The theory predicts that the occurrence of cue selection is independent of whether the relevant learning trials are presented in a standard forward manner or in a backward manner and that within-compound associations are of equal importance in both cases. We found that the strength of the cue-selection effect was positively correlated with knowledge of within-compound associations in the backward condition but not in the forward condition. Furthermore, cue-selection effects were less pronounced in the former than in the latter condition. These results are at variance with the comparator hypothesis but are in agreement with a modified associative theory and with the suggestion that retrospective revaluation might be due to rehearsal processes.

[1]  S. Klein,et al.  Handbook of contemporary learning theories , 2000 .

[2]  R. R. Miller,et al.  Associative effects of US preexposure: modulation of conditioned responding by an excitatory training context. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[3]  R. Bolles,et al.  A nonassociative aspect of overshadowing , 1981 .

[4]  J. H. Steiger.  Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. , 1980 .

[5]  Ralph R. Miller,et al.  The Basic Laws of Conditioning Differ for Elemental Cues and Cues Trained in Compound , 2004, Psychological science.

[6]  Tom Beckers,et al.  Second-order backward blocking and unovershadowing in human causal learning. , 2002, Experimental psychology.

[7]  D. Shanks.  Forward and Backward Blocking in Human Contingency Judgement , 1985 .

[8]  R. Rescorla,et al.  A theory of Pavlovian conditioning : Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement , 1972 .

[9]  Anthony Dickinson,et al.  Re-examination of the role of within-compound associations in the retrospective revaluation of causal judgements. , 2001 .

[10]  G. Chapman,et al.  Trial order affects cue interaction in contingency judgment. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  E. Wasserman,et al.  Backward Blocking and Recovery from Overshadowing in Human Causal Judgement: The Role of Within-compound Associations , 1998, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[12]  Ralph R. Miller,et al.  Biological significance in forward and backward blocking: Resolution of a discrepancy between animal conditioning and human causal judgment , 1996 .

[13]  Klaus G. Melchers,et al.  Within-compound associations in retrospective revaluation and in direct learning: a challenge for comparator theory. , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[14]  E. Wasserman,et al.  Cue Competition in Causality Judgments: The Role of Nonpresentation of Compound Stimulus Elements , 1994 .

[15]  A. Blaisdell,et al.  Cue Competition as a Retrieval Deficit , 2003 .

[16]  Ralph R. Miller,et al.  The comparator hypothesis: A response rule for the expression of associations. , 1988 .