Response activation in overlapping tasks and the response-selection bottleneck.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] J. C. Johnston,et al. Vanishing dual-task interference after practice: has the bottleneck been eliminated or is it merely latent? , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[2] L. Karlin,et al. Effects of Number of Alternatives on the Psychological Refractory Period , 1968, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[3] Deutsche Gesellschaft für Psychologie. Archiv für Psychologie , 1970 .
[4] John R. Anderson,et al. Learning to achieve perfect timesharing: architectural implications of Hazeltine, Teague, and Ivry (2002). , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[5] A. Greenwald,et al. Activation by marginally perceptible ("subliminal") stimuli: dissociation of unconscious from conscious cognition. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[6] Saul Sternberg,et al. The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method , 1969 .
[7] R W Proctor,et al. Multiple spatial correspondence effects on dual-task performance. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[8] R. D. Gordon,et al. Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. , 2001, Psychological review.
[9] A. Greenwald. New look 3. Unconscious cognition reclaimed. , 1992, The American psychologist.
[10] H. Pashler,et al. Is dual-task slowing instruction dependent? , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[11] Jennifer M. Glass,et al. Concurrent response-selection processes in dual-task performance: Evidence for adaptive executive control of task scheduling. , 1999 .
[12] Jeff Miller,et al. Backward response-level crosstalk in the psychological refractory period paradigm. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[13] D. Gopher,et al. Attention and performance XVII: Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application. , 1999 .
[14] P. Jolicoeur,et al. A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[15] J. Schwarzbach,et al. Different time courses for visual perception and action priming , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[16] Steven W. Keele,et al. Attention and human performance , 1973 .
[17] Bernhard Hommel,et al. Control of stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance , 2002, Psychological research.
[18] T. Shallice,et al. Task Switching : A PDP Model , 2001 .
[19] R. Schweickert. Latent network theory: scheduling of processes in sentence verification and the Stroop effect. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[20] H. Pashler. Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.
[21] Jeff Miller,et al. Discrete and continuous models of human information processing: theoretical distinctions and empirical results. , 1988, Acta psychologica.
[22] G D Logan,et al. Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: I. Semantic memory. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[23] O. Neumann,et al. Motor activation without conscious discrimination in metacontrast masking. , 1999 .
[24] A. Osman,et al. Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy. , 1990, Psychological review.
[25] R. Proctor,et al. Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: Implications for response selection , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[26] Jennifer M. Glass,et al. Virtually Perfect Time Sharing in Dual-Task Performance: Uncorking the Central Cognitive Bottleneck , 2001, Psychological science.
[27] R W Proctor,et al. Determinants of right-left and top-bottom prevalence for two-dimensional spatial compatibility. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[28] The up-right/down-left advantage occurs for both participant- and computer-paced conditions: an empirical observation on Adam, Boon, Paas, and Umiltà (1998). , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[29] M. Eimer. Facilitatory and inhibitory effects of masked prime stimuli on motor activation and behavioural performance. , 1999, Acta psychologica.
[30] D E Kieras,et al. A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. , 1997, Psychological review.
[31] M. Moscovitch,et al. Attention and Performance 15: Conscious and Nonconscious Information Processing , 1994 .
[32] Ann Reynolds,et al. The locus of redundant-targets and nontargets effects: evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[33] Torsten Schubert,et al. Processing differences between simple and choice reactions affect bottleneck localization in overlapping tasks , 1999 .
[34] J. C. Johnston,et al. Chronometric Evidence for Central Postponement in Temporally Overlapping Tasks , 2003 .
[35] B. Hommel. Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[36] G D Logan,et al. Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: II. Episodic memory. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[37] A. Sanders. 20 Stage Analysis of Reaction Processes , 1980 .
[38] C. Frith,et al. Routes to action in reaction time tasks , 1986, Psychological research.
[39] A. Welford. THE ‘PSYCHOLOGICAL REFRACTORY PERIOD’ AND THE TIMING OF HIGH‐SPEED PERFORMANCE—A REVIEW AND A THEORY , 1952 .
[40] M. Goodale,et al. Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.
[41] M. Eimer,et al. Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[42] H. Pashler,et al. Saccadic Eye Movements and Dual-Task Interference , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[43] T. Chartrand,et al. THE UNBEARABLE AUTOMATICITY OF BEING , 1999 .
[44] G. Aschersleben,et al. The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.
[45] W. Prinz,et al. Dual–Task Slowing and the Effects of Cross–Task Compatibility , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[46] David E. Kieras,et al. Précis to a practical unified theory of cognition and action: Some lessons from EPIC computational models of human multiple-task performance , 1997 .
[47] MARGARET A. VINCE,et al. Time taken to change the Speed of a Response , 1967, Nature.
[48] Ulrich Ansorge,et al. Top–Down Contingencies of Nonconscious Priming Revealed by Dual–Task Interference , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[49] J. Brožek. Attention and Performance II. , 1971 .
[50] J. C. Johnston,et al. Locus of the single-channel bottleneck in dual-task interference , 1992 .
[51] J. Requin,et al. The Effects of Irrelevant Stimuli: 1. The Time Course of Stimulus-Stimulus and Stimulus-Response Consistency Effects With Stroop-Like Stimuli, Simon-Like Tasks, and Their Factorial Combinations , 1999 .
[52] Ritske de Jong,et al. Multiple bottlenecks in overlapping task performance , 1993 .
[53] Wolfgang Prinz,et al. Process interference and code overlap in dual-task performance , 2002 .
[54] Hartmut Leuthold,et al. Mechanisms of Priming by Masked Stimuli: Inferences From Event-Related Brain Potentials , 1998 .
[55] Eric Ruthruff,et al. Dual-task performance with ideomotor-compatible tasks: is the central processing bottleneck intact, bypassed, or shifted in locus? , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.