Response activation in overlapping tasks and the response-selection bottleneck.

The authors investigated the impact of response activation on dual-task performance by presenting a subliminal prime before the stimulus in Task 2 (S2) of a psychological refractory period (PRP) task. Congruence between prime and S2 modulated the reaction times in Task 2 at short stimulus onset asynchrony despite a PRP effect. This Task 2 congruence effect was paralleled by a Task 1 congruence effect and emerged exclusively under conditions of cross talk, whereas it did not occur under dual-task conditions preventing cross talk between tasks. This suggests that response activation operates during the PRP in dual tasks and affects the response times in Task 2 via cross talk between common processing elements at prebottleneck stages but not by directly affecting the postbottleneck stages.

[1]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Vanishing dual-task interference after practice: has the bottleneck been eliminated or is it merely latent? , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  L. Karlin,et al.  Effects of Number of Alternatives on the Psychological Refractory Period , 1968, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  Deutsche Gesellschaft für Psychologie Archiv für Psychologie , 1970 .

[4]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Learning to achieve perfect timesharing: architectural implications of Hazeltine, Teague, and Ivry (2002). , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Activation by marginally perceptible ("subliminal") stimuli: dissociation of unconscious from conscious cognition. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[6]  Saul Sternberg,et al.  The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method , 1969 .

[7]  R W Proctor,et al.  Multiple spatial correspondence effects on dual-task performance. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  R. D. Gordon,et al.  Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. , 2001, Psychological review.

[9]  A. Greenwald New look 3. Unconscious cognition reclaimed. , 1992, The American psychologist.

[10]  H. Pashler,et al.  Is dual-task slowing instruction dependent? , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  Jennifer M. Glass,et al.  Concurrent response-selection processes in dual-task performance: Evidence for adaptive executive control of task scheduling. , 1999 .

[12]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Backward response-level crosstalk in the psychological refractory period paradigm. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  D. Gopher,et al.  Attention and performance XVII: Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application. , 1999 .

[14]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  J. Schwarzbach,et al.  Different time courses for visual perception and action priming , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Steven W. Keele,et al.  Attention and human performance , 1973 .

[17]  Bernhard Hommel,et al.  Control of stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance , 2002, Psychological research.

[18]  T. Shallice,et al.  Task Switching : A PDP Model , 2001 .

[19]  R. Schweickert Latent network theory: scheduling of processes in sentence verification and the Stroop effect. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  H. Pashler Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[21]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Discrete and continuous models of human information processing: theoretical distinctions and empirical results. , 1988, Acta psychologica.

[22]  G D Logan,et al.  Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: I. Semantic memory. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  O. Neumann,et al.  Motor activation without conscious discrimination in metacontrast masking. , 1999 .

[24]  A. Osman,et al.  Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy. , 1990, Psychological review.

[25]  R. Proctor,et al.  Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: Implications for response selection , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[26]  Jennifer M. Glass,et al.  Virtually Perfect Time Sharing in Dual-Task Performance: Uncorking the Central Cognitive Bottleneck , 2001, Psychological science.

[27]  R W Proctor,et al.  Determinants of right-left and top-bottom prevalence for two-dimensional spatial compatibility. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  The up-right/down-left advantage occurs for both participant- and computer-paced conditions: an empirical observation on Adam, Boon, Paas, and Umiltà (1998). , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  M. Eimer Facilitatory and inhibitory effects of masked prime stimuli on motor activation and behavioural performance. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[30]  D E Kieras,et al.  A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. , 1997, Psychological review.

[31]  M. Moscovitch,et al.  Attention and Performance 15: Conscious and Nonconscious Information Processing , 1994 .

[32]  Ann Reynolds,et al.  The locus of redundant-targets and nontargets effects: evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  Torsten Schubert,et al.  Processing differences between simple and choice reactions affect bottleneck localization in overlapping tasks , 1999 .

[34]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Chronometric Evidence for Central Postponement in Temporally Overlapping Tasks , 2003 .

[35]  B. Hommel Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  G D Logan,et al.  Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: II. Episodic memory. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[37]  A. Sanders 20 Stage Analysis of Reaction Processes , 1980 .

[38]  C. Frith,et al.  Routes to action in reaction time tasks , 1986, Psychological research.

[39]  A. Welford THE ‘PSYCHOLOGICAL REFRACTORY PERIOD’ AND THE TIMING OF HIGH‐SPEED PERFORMANCE—A REVIEW AND A THEORY , 1952 .

[40]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[41]  M. Eimer,et al.  Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  H. Pashler,et al.  Saccadic Eye Movements and Dual-Task Interference , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[43]  T. Chartrand,et al.  THE UNBEARABLE AUTOMATICITY OF BEING , 1999 .

[44]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[45]  W. Prinz,et al.  Dual–Task Slowing and the Effects of Cross–Task Compatibility , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[46]  David E. Kieras,et al.  Précis to a practical unified theory of cognition and action: Some lessons from EPIC computational models of human multiple-task performance , 1997 .

[47]  MARGARET A. VINCE,et al.  Time taken to change the Speed of a Response , 1967, Nature.

[48]  Ulrich Ansorge,et al.  Top–Down Contingencies of Nonconscious Priming Revealed by Dual–Task Interference , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[49]  J. Brožek Attention and Performance II. , 1971 .

[50]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Locus of the single-channel bottleneck in dual-task interference , 1992 .

[51]  J. Requin,et al.  The Effects of Irrelevant Stimuli: 1. The Time Course of Stimulus-Stimulus and Stimulus-Response Consistency Effects With Stroop-Like Stimuli, Simon-Like Tasks, and Their Factorial Combinations , 1999 .

[52]  Ritske de Jong,et al.  Multiple bottlenecks in overlapping task performance , 1993 .

[53]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Process interference and code overlap in dual-task performance , 2002 .

[54]  Hartmut Leuthold,et al.  Mechanisms of Priming by Masked Stimuli: Inferences From Event-Related Brain Potentials , 1998 .

[55]  Eric Ruthruff,et al.  Dual-task performance with ideomotor-compatible tasks: is the central processing bottleneck intact, bypassed, or shifted in locus? , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.