Understanding technology in contemporary surgical nursing: a phenomenographic examination.

The purpose of this paper is to describe the result of phenomenographic research undertaken to identify the qualitatively different ways technology is understood and experienced by contemporary surgical nurses. Twenty surgical nurses were interviewed and conversations were recorded through the use of drawings and audiotape that were analysed using a series of seven analytical steps. There were two major outcomes of the research: eight categories of description were revealed and each one constitutes a conception of the experience and understanding of technology, and an outcome space portraying the logical relations between conceptions was identified. Conceptions revealed demonstrate the importance of technology to the theory, practice, research and education of nurses, and highlight the complexity and significance of technology in contemporary surgical nursing experience.

[1]  Ivan Illich,et al.  Limits to medicine , 1976 .

[2]  C. Bruce.  Seven faces of information literacy , 1997 .

[3]  R. Gerber,et al.  Phenomenography: A Qualitative Research Approach for Exploring Understanding in Health Care , 1999, Qualitative health research.

[4]  Ference Marton,et al.  Phenomenography-a research approach to investigating different understandings of reality , 1986 .

[5]  Janie Brown.  Nurses or technicians? The impact of technology on oncology nursing , 1992 .

[6]  Rod Gerber,et al.  A phenomenographical approach to the study of pre-adolescents' use of maps in a wayfinding exercise in a suburban environment , 1994 .

[7]  Howard Falk,et al.  The Technological Society , 1965 .

[8]  L. Clarke.  Nursing research: science, visions and telling stories. , 1995, Journal of advanced nursing.

[9]  M. Fallsberg,et al.  Phenomenography as a qualitative approach in social pharmacy research. , 1991 .

[10]  Dennis Beach,et al.  Phenomenography — a “good‐for‐nothing brother” of phenomenology? Outline of an analysis , 1997 .

[11]  F. Marton,et al.  Conceptions of learning , 1993 .

[12]  Lennart Svensson,et al.  Theoretical Foundations of Phenomenography. , 1997 .

[13]  Jorgen Sandburg.  Are Phenomenographic Results Reliable , 1997 .

[14]  F. Marton.  Phenomenography — Describing conceptions of the world around us , 1981 .

[15]  Phenomenography: an alternative approach to researching the clinical decision-making of nurses. , 1997, Nursing inquiry.

[16]  Arnold Pacey,et al.  Culture technology , 1986, CABI Compendium.

[17]  S. Kvale.  The Qualitative Research Interview , 1983 .

[18]  A. Pearson.  Nursing, technology and the human condition. , 1993, Journal of advanced nursing.

[19]  A. Barnard,et al.  Technology and nursing: an anatomy of definition. , 1996, International journal of nursing studies.

[20]  J. Allan,et al.  Challenging the focus on technology: A critique of the medical model in a changing health care system , 1988, ANS. Advances in nursing science.

[21]  M Sandelowski,et al.  (Ir)reconcilable differences? The debate concerning nursing and technology. , 1997, Image--the journal of nursing scholarship.

[22]  M. Heidegger.  The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays , 1977 .

[23]  C. Wenestam.  Qualitative age-related differences in the meaning of the word “death” to children , 1984 .

[24]  A. Barnard.  A critical review of the belief that technology is a neutral object and nurses are its master. , 1997, Journal of advanced nursing.

[25]  Jörgen Sandbergh,et al.  Are Phenomenographic Results Reliable , 1997 .