The contribution of visual information to the perception of speech in noise with and without informative temporal fine structure
暂无分享,去创建一个
Christian J. Sumner | Paula C. Stacey | Pádraig T. Kitterick | Saffron D. Morris | P. Kitterick | C. Sumner | Saffron D. Morris
[1] Q J Fu,et al. Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: acoustic and electric hearing. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[2] K. Grant,et al. Auditory-visual speech recognition by hearing-impaired subjects: consonant recognition, sentence recognition, and auditory-visual integration. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[3] A Quentin Summerfield,et al. Benefit of temporal fine structure to speech perception in noise measured with controlled temporal envelopes. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[4] Hugo Fastl,et al. Speech Perception With Combined Electric-Acoustic Stimulation: A Simulation and Model Comparison , 2015, Ear and hearing.
[5] Joshua G. W. Bernstein,et al. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[6] J K Shallop,et al. Evaluation of a new spectral peak coding strategy for the Nucleus 22 Channel Cochlear Implant System. , 1994, The American journal of otology.
[7] P K Kuhl,et al. The contribution of fundamental frequency, amplitude envelope, and voicing duration cues to speechreading in normal-hearing subjects. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[8] A Kohlrausch,et al. Intrinsic envelope fluctuations and modulation-detection thresholds for narrow-band noise carriers. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[9] R V Shannon,et al. Speech Recognition with Primarily Temporal Cues , 1995, Science.
[10] A. Boothroyd,et al. Voice Fundamental Frequency as an Auditory Supplement to the Speechreading of Sentences , 1988, Ear and hearing.
[11] Antje Ihlefeld,et al. Simulations of cochlear-implant speech perception in modulated and unmodulated noise. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[12] Richard L Freyman,et al. Effect of number of masking talkers and auditory priming on informational masking in speech recognition. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[13] T. Dau,et al. Intrinsic envelope fluctuations and modulation-detection thresholds for narrow-band noise carriers. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[14] D. M. Green,et al. Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .
[15] J. Peelle,et al. Prediction and constraint in audiovisual speech perception , 2015, Cortex.
[16] Jong Kyoung Kim,et al. Speech recognition , 1983, 1983 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference. Digest of Technical Papers.
[17] R. Campbell,et al. Hearing by eye : the psychology of lip-reading , 1988 .
[18] L D Braida,et al. Auditory supplements to speechreading: combining amplitude envelope cues from different spectral regions of speech. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[19] Ray Meddis,et al. A revised model of the inner-hair cell and auditory-nerve complex. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[20] Ken W. Grant,et al. Auditory Supplements to Speechreading , 2003 .
[21] David B Pisoni,et al. Some normative data on lip-reading skills (L). , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[22] Bernhard U. Seeber,et al. A Phenomenological Model of the Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve Fiber: Temporal and Biphasic Response Properties , 2016, Front. Comput. Neurosci..
[23] IEEE Recommended Practice for Speech Quality Measurements , 1969, IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics.
[24] B J Gantz,et al. Performance over time of adult patients using the Ineraid or nucleus cochlear implant. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[25] S. Kramer,et al. The self-reported handicapping effect of hearing disabilities. , 1998, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.
[26] B. Moore. The Role of Temporal Fine Structure Processing in Pitch Perception, Masking, and Speech Perception for Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired People , 2008, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.
[27] Edgar Erdfelder,et al. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.
[28] J. Pannekoek,et al. Bootstrapping Goodness-of-Fit Measures in Categorical Data Analysis , 1996 .
[29] P J Blamey,et al. Speech perception using combinations of auditory, visual, and tactile information. , 1989, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.
[30] Richard L Freyman,et al. Speech intelligibility in cochlear implant simulations: Effects of carrier type, interfering noise, and subject experience. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[31] A. Davis,et al. The prevalence of hearing impairment and reported hearing disability among adults in Great Britain. , 1989, International journal of epidemiology.
[32] Christophe Micheyl,et al. Comparing models of the combined-stimulation advantage for speech recognition. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[33] L. Braida. Crossmodal Integration in the Identification of Consonant Segments , 1991, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[34] Jace Wolfe,et al. Evaluation of speech recognition in noise with cochlear implants and dynamic FM. , 2009, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[35] Erin C Schafer,et al. Speech recognition abilities of adults using cochlear implants with FM systems. , 2004, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[36] Diana Williams,et al. Listening to Speech , 2018, early Listening Skills.
[37] Brian C J Moore,et al. Speech perception problems of the hearing impaired reflect inability to use temporal fine structure , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[38] K. Grant,et al. Integration efficiency for speech perception within and across sensory modalities by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired individuals. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[39] Stuart Rosen,et al. Listening to speech in a background of other talkers: effects of talker number and noise vocoding. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[40] Michael K. Qin,et al. Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[41] Mitchell Sommers,et al. Aging, Audiovisual Integration, and the Principle of Inverse Effectiveness , 2010, Ear and hearing.
[42] M. Dorman,et al. Speech intelligibility as a function of the number of channels of stimulation for signal processors using sine-wave and noise-band outputs. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[43] Eric Truy,et al. A model-based analysis of the “combined-stimulation advantage” , 2011, Hearing Research.
[44] N. P. Erber. Auditory-visual perception of speech. , 1975, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.
[45] David B Pisoni,et al. Talker and lexical effects on audiovisual word recognition by adults with cochlear implants. , 2003, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[46] S. Scott,et al. Speech comprehension aided by multiple modalities: Behavioural and neural interactions , 2012, Neuropsychologia.
[47] Ying-Yee Kong,et al. Improved speech recognition in noise in simulated binaurally combined acoustic and electric stimulation. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[48] W. H. Sumby,et al. Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise , 1954 .
[49] D. Pisoni,et al. Recognizing Spoken Words: The Neighborhood Activation Model , 1998, Ear and hearing.
[50] R. Cowan,et al. Spatial spread of neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of improved ECAP method and psychophysical forward masking , 2003, Hearing Research.
[51] DeLiang Wang,et al. Multitalker speech perception with ideal time-frequency segregation: effects of voice characteristics and number of talkers. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[52] Shihab Shamma,et al. On the balance of envelope and temporal fine structure in the encoding of speech in the early auditory system. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[53] G. A. Miller,et al. An Analysis of Perceptual Confusions Among Some English Consonants , 1955 .
[54] L D Braida,et al. Single Band Amplitude Envelope Cues as an Aid to Speechreading , 1991, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[55] Thomas Lunner,et al. Effect of Speech Material on the Benefit of Temporal Fine Structure Information in Speech for Young Normal-Hearing and Older Hearing-Impaired Participants , 2012, Ear and hearing.
[56] Brian R Glasberg,et al. Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data , 1990, Hearing Research.
[57] B. Fraysse,et al. Evidence that cochlear-implanted deaf patients are better multisensory integrators , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[58] S. Desai,et al. Auditory-visual speech perception in normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[59] C. Schroeder,et al. Neuronal Oscillations and Multisensory Interaction in Primary Auditory Cortex , 2007, Neuron.
[60] Michel Treisman,et al. Combining Information: Probability Summation and Probability Averaging in Detection and Discrimination , 1998 .
[61] Brian C. J. Moore,et al. Auditory Processing of Temporal Fine Structure:Effects of Age and Hearing Loss , 2014 .
[62] Jon Barker,et al. An audio-visual corpus for speech perception and automatic speech recognition. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[63] L D Rosenblum,et al. Effects of talker variability on speechreading , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.